mutsuu

mutsuu — CS2 Stats

AT76561199014700822[U:1:1054435094]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,346Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,286Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1409 of 9328 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,966 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmutsuuFACEITLevel 10 · 2,966 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,286 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning46
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51463Last 10051%Win rateLLLWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression3.4
Utility4.4
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.6
Utility4.4
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time556ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy26.2%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 26.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — office 4–13
131Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA28161257%0.03
dust2B178947%0.00
anubisB179853%0.02
ancientS139469%0.00
infernoD71614%-0.03
cacheA74357%-0.01
nukeD72529%0.01
office1010%0.15
vertigo1010%0.02
poseidon110100%0.00
overpass110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,342Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
82.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage41854%1.2217.4
Ancient23453%1.1617.3
Anubis16251%1.1315.7
Dust28551%1.0916.9
Inferno8444%1.0515.2
Nuke7951%1.2117.4
Vertigo4965%1.1517.3
Overpass4553%1.1215.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.0%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
549msReaction time
19.2%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
8.36HE damage / grenade
5.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4654 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.2098% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office4–130.1531%26 Aug
mirage11–130.0228%26 Aug
dust213–160.0331%26 Aug
inferno13–20.0017%26 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0219%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0020%23 Aug
dust213–11-0.1130%22 Aug
mirage13–70.0820%22 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0218%22 Aug
mirage8–130.0221%20 Aug
vertigo4–130.0219%20 Aug
cache9–130.0627%20 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0619%15 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0616%14 Aug
dust213–20.0573%14 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0231%14 Aug
anubis9–130.0921%13 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0824%13 Aug
ancient13–60.0134%12 Aug
anubis13–80.0731%11 Aug
ancient14–160.0136%11 Aug
mirage13–70.0520%9 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0525%8 Aug
mirage0–13-0.100%7 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0425%7 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0018%7 Aug
inferno5–90.0040%2 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0238%1 Aug
mirage10–130.0620%1 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0336%1 Aug
dust26–13-0.0224%30 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0526%28 Jul
mirage13–80.1026%27 Jul
anubis6–13-0.1433%26 Jul
anubis22–180.0723%21 Jul
dust22–13-0.0817%16 Jul
cache13–90.0517%14 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0623%14 Jul
cache13–11-0.0421%14 Jul
mirage16–130.0722%14 Jul
dust213–160.0033%13 Jul
mirage13–80.0631%13 Jul
ancient13–30.1528%12 Jul
dust213–60.0132%12 Jul
anubis13–40.0426%12 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0529%11 Jul
dust210–4-0.0010%11 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0225%11 Jul
cache13–100.0318%10 Jul
anubis13–40.0518%10 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0226%10 Jul
mirage13–100.1021%10 Jul
nuke13–10.0835%9 Jul
ancient13–160.0522%7 Jul
nuke11–130.0121%7 Jul
dust213–50.0733%6 Jul
anubis7–13-0.009%4 Jul
mirage7–130.0215%4 Jul
anubis13–20.1416%4 Jul
dust213–70.0438%4 Jul
anubis7–20.0625%4 Jul
dust211–130.0218%4 Jul
mirage13–10.0211%4 Jul
mirage13–40.0811%4 Jul
dust29–130.0227%4 Jul
anubis13–20.0347%4 Jul
dust213–40.0836%4 Jul
anubis13–20.1019%4 Jul
dust216–140.0923%4 Jul
ancient13–110.0217%2 Jul
mirage6–130.0536%2 Jul
nuke1–110.0333%2 Jul
mirage13–10.1310%2 Jul
poseidon9–60.0013%1 Jul
dust25–13-0.0633%1 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0225%23 Jun
cache7–13-0.0525%22 Jun
cache13–7-0.0515%22 Jun
ancient13–100.0628%22 Jun
mirage16–130.0815%21 Jun
mirage13–20.0928%18 Jun
nuke13–40.0114%16 Jun
ancient19–17-0.0722%16 Jun
mirage13–70.0127%15 Jun
dust20–7-0.05100%13 Jun
mirage13–160.0723%8 Jun
mirage13–110.0320%7 Jun
cache12–12-0.0542%7 Jun
mirage13–80.0620%7 Jun
nuke2–7-0.0625%5 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0721%5 Jun
inferno3–9-0.0826%4 Jun
overpass16–140.0321%4 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0511%4 Jun
nuke11–130.0428%3 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0123%3 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0325%3 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0519%31 May
anubis13–70.0124%30 May
dust24–13-0.0512%30 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →