jake — CS2 Stats

76561199013511067[U:1:1053245339]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

10,402Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,324 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80

Positioning54

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateWWWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0

Aggression6.2

Utility6.2

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0

Positioning5.4

Utility6.2

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time571ms−36ms

first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms

Headshot accuracy28.2%+3.7%

first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 28.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 13–3

13–0Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 11ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	27	14–13	52%	-0.01
dust2	S	17	11–6	65%	0.00
cache	A	16	9–7	56%	0.02
anubis	C	14	6–8	43%	0.01
inferno	S	11	8–3	73%	-0.00
ancient	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.01
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
shelter	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.06
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	0.06
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

9,075Matches

51%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

83.5ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	1837	53%	1.09	16.9
Dust2	926	48%	1.05	16.4
Anubis	767	51%	1.07	17.1
Ancient	670	50%	1.07	16.5
Inferno	535	54%	1.13	17.1
Nuke	451	48%	1.09	16.8
Overpass	194	53%	1.11	17.0
Vertigo	180	45%	1.08	17.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.2%Headshot accuracy

33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.6%Spray accuracy

82.4%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

578msReaction time

22.3%T opening success

58.3%CT opening success

0.73Enemies flashed / flash

11.6%Flash assists

8.71HE damage / grenade

9.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.3307% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–7	-0.00	21%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–1	-0.04	30%	25 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.01	32%	22 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.07	17%	22 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.01	35%	22 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	44%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	34%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–0	0.04	50%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.06	25%	19 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.04	16%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.04	30%	18 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	16%	17 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	21%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.01	25%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.04	26%	14 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.01	29%	14 Aug →
anubis	1–13	0.04	26%	14 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	33%	14 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	34%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.00	41%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.05	20%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	38%	11 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.08	20%	11 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.03	31%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	24%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.04	24%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.06	23%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.00	24%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.03	25%	9 Aug →
train	4–13	-0.02	20%	9 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.00	26%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.04	36%	7 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.06	31%	7 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	36%	4 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.02	26%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	20%	3 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.00	32%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.08	39%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–16	0.01	33%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.08	31%	3 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.01	30%	3 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.05	33%	2 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.05	37%	2 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.06	21%	2 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	21%	29 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	27%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	13%	28 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.00	34%	27 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	26%	27 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.07	30%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.11	30%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.06	8%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	20%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	16%	27 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	20%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.04	10%	24 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.04	15%	24 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	23%	23 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	15%	23 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	20%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.02	20%	21 Jul →
shelter	8–13	-0.00	14%	19 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.08	21%	19 Jul →
shelter	13–6	0.02	20%	19 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.03	26%	19 Jul →
anubis	12–12	0.02	13%	19 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.01	27%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.06	23%	19 Jul →
ancient	19–16	0.04	26%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.05	17%	18 Jul →
office	3–2	0.06	56%	18 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	29%	18 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	33%	18 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	15%	18 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.05	8%	17 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	7%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.07	28%	16 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.05	37%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.12	30%	16 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.00	24%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.01	30%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.02	34%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.04	21%	15 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	10%	14 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.06	26%	14 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.02	21%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	13%	12 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	24%	10 Jul →
boulder	10–13	0.06	28%	9 Jul →
fachwerk	6–13	-0.04	38%	9 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	12%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	23%	6 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.01	28%	6 Jul →
dust2	1–5	-0.05	21%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	25%	29 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	16%	29 Jun →
overpass	12–16	-0.04	20%	28 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	32%	28 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	22%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	31%	27 Jun →