Snipps

Snipps — CS2 Stats

AU76561199012937342[U:1:1052671614]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,104Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating13,381Blue band · top ~37% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+358Premier CS Rating · 13,023 → 13,381

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,381 -3,254 17 Jul – 9 Oct · 30 days played
13,02318,107peak 18,10717 Jul9 Oct
18,107Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-07-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,726 below peak (18,107)
  • -2,099 over 30 days · declining
  • -3,254 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,619 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnippsFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER13,381 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning64
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–48–3Last 10049%Win rateWWLLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.4
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch1.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 61% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.4
Utility6.4
Mechanics9.1
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time601ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 10 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · cache, 27 Jul →
453msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · dust2, 27 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 10 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
11–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2411–1346%0.01
dust2D248–1633%0.00
infernoA1610–663%-0.01
ancientA138–562%0.00
nukeA106–460%-0.00
cacheS64–267%0.03
anubisD51–420%-0.04
train—11–0100%0.07
office—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

39Matches
56%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
78.9ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
47%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage967%1.0914.0
Inferno425%0.9414.0
Dust24100%1.5814.8
Nuke475%1.1816.0
Anubis367%0.7711.7
Ancient1100%1.3615.0
Cache10%0.8214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
90.8%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
602msReaction time
60.7%T opening success
37.8%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
8.29HE damage / grenade
8.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.8321% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–5-0.0317%9 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0328%9 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0111%7 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0515%7 Oct →
mirage13–60.0315%6 Oct →
ancient13–50.0119%6 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.1217%2 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.059%2 Oct →
dust213–110.0324%2 Oct →
mirage13–40.0332%2 Oct →
inferno13–50.0614%1 Oct →
inferno13–110.0033%28 Sept →
mirage13–100.1012%28 Sept →
dust211–130.0028%28 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0015%25 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0324%24 Sept →
nuke13–110.0218%24 Sept →
inferno13–160.0521%24 Sept →
mirage13–100.0418%23 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0026%21 Sept →
dust211–130.0523%21 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0216%17 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0616%15 Sept →
dust26–130.0421%15 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0522%15 Sept →
dust216–140.0612%10 Sept →
nuke13–160.0015%10 Sept →
mirage13–20.1317%10 Sept →
ancient13–60.059%10 Sept →
inferno13–70.0029%9 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0038%8 Sept →
dust211–130.0122%8 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0133%8 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0117%7 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0416%4 Sept →
dust213–110.0011%4 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0138%2 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0731%2 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0117%1 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0433%28 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0218%28 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0532%27 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0325%27 Aug →
ancient10–130.0825%27 Aug →
mirage2–1-0.0517%27 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.029%25 Aug →
ancient8–130.0528%25 Aug →
mirage11–130.0031%25 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0235%16 Aug →
ancient13–50.0215%16 Aug →
dust213–20.1131%15 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.078%15 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0229%14 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0316%14 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0518%14 Aug →
mirage13–50.0723%14 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0830%14 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0328%13 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0320%12 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0321%7 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0539%2 Aug →
nuke13–60.1122%31 Jul →
mirage13–70.0218%31 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0523%31 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0321%31 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0333%31 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0524%30 Jul →
mirage13–90.0220%30 Jul →
mirage5–130.0023%30 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0028%28 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0630%28 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.1214%28 Jul →
dust213–40.1233%28 Jul →
train11–10.0739%27 Jul →
inferno9–130.0117%27 Jul →
ancient13–90.0523%27 Jul →
inferno15–15-0.0219%27 Jul →
cache13–80.0325%27 Jul →
dust213–90.0431%27 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0011%27 Jul →
cache13–110.1040%27 Jul →
dust211–130.0330%26 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0019%26 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0221%24 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0515%24 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0113%24 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0516%24 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0124%22 Jul →
mirage13–30.0525%22 Jul →
mirage10–130.0219%22 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0514%22 Jul →
nuke16–130.0719%18 Jul →
office5–13-0.0333%17 Jul →
inferno13–80.0213%17 Jul →
cache13–100.0918%17 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0321%17 Jul →
inferno16–14-0.0211%17 Jul →
mirage9–130.0427%17 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0714%17 Jul →
cache13–40.0536%17 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.