Niiiiiggggggggghhhhh

Niiiiiggggggggghhhhh — CS2 Stats

AT76561199012541750[U:1:1052276022]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

259Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,313Blue band · top ~42.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Jul 2026 (74 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 7 Jul 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,313 +5,327 8 Jul5 Jul · 19 days played
6,98612,313peak 12,3138 Jul5 Jul
12,437Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2025-07-07

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 12,313
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,687 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNiiiiiggggggggghhhhhFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,313 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning61
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49483Last 10049%Win rateWLWWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.7pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Last 20

  • 1631 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility2.8
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 640ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.1
Utility2.8
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time657ms+70ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 657ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 15–15 · inferno, 2 Jul
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · inferno, 29 Jun
297msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 8 Jul
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 23 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 20dust2Weakest map · 36% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB32151747%0.02
dust2C2591636%0.00
infernoS2013765%0.01
overpassC52340%0.04
nukeA53260%0.01
anubis32167%0.06
ancient31233%0.03
office32167%0.03
train21150%0.05
vertigo110100%0.07
grail1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches
36%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
80.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage944%0.9013.3
Dust2520%0.8714.0
Inferno333%0.8517.7
Ancient367%1.4422.7
Anubis10%0.336.0
Nuke10%0.7818.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
41.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
640msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
56.4%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
5.93HE damage / grenade
6.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4059 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5254% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0221%10 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0511%5 Jul
anubis13–80.0015%5 Jul
mirage13–110.0520%5 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0814%5 Jul
mirage13–110.0611%4 Jul
dust213–16-0.0113%3 Jul
dust213–100.0315%3 Jul
overpass13–11-0.026%2 Jul
anubis13–80.1114%2 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0018%2 Jul
dust213–10-0.0113%2 Jul
inferno15–150.1315%2 Jul
dust29–13-0.0811%30 Jun
dust213–10-0.0130%30 Jun
mirage13–90.0111%29 Jun
nuke13–20.0527%29 Jun
inferno13–100.0448%29 Jun
mirage13–20.1112%29 Jun
inferno16–120.0113%29 Jun
mirage13–100.0324%29 Jun
dust210–130.0124%29 Jun
dust23–13-0.0622%27 Jun
inferno4–130.0228%22 Jun
mirage8–130.0723%8 Mar
ancient6–130.105%8 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0422%7 Mar
dust20–2-0.0425%6 Feb
office13–80.0614%6 Feb
mirage8–130.0713%6 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0822%6 Feb
office11–13-0.0117%6 Feb
mirage1–13-0.0210%4 Jan
office13–80.0610%4 Jan
train2–110.0621%25 Dec
mirage3–13-0.0310%30 Aug
mirage13–60.0313%22 Aug
mirage5–130.045%18 Aug
overpass8–130.0117%7 Aug
inferno13–90.0114%7 Aug
inferno13–80.0418%6 Aug
dust210–13-0.0017%4 Aug
inferno13–70.0616%4 Aug
vertigo13–90.0720%4 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0315%3 Aug
mirage8–13-0.016%1 Aug
dust25–13-0.0315%31 Jul
dust213–70.0315%31 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0326%31 Jul
mirage6–13-0.108%29 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0711%29 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0613%28 Jul
dust27–130.0516%27 Jul
dust28–70.1317%27 Jul
mirage13–110.0312%26 Jul
nuke13–40.1211%26 Jul
dust22–13-0.0510%26 Jul
dust210–130.0217%25 Jul
mirage11–130.078%25 Jul
dust26–130.1023%24 Jul
mirage15–150.068%24 Jul
mirage13–100.1113%24 Jul
nuke6–13-0.045%23 Jul
inferno13–10.0618%23 Jul
train13–80.036%22 Jul
mirage13–50.1113%22 Jul
dust213–80.018%22 Jul
mirage13–7-0.048%22 Jul
mirage13–70.0323%22 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0411%21 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0316%21 Jul
nuke13–3-0.019%21 Jul
dust213–40.0410%19 Jul
mirage9–130.0311%18 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0312%18 Jul
dust212–12-0.0716%17 Jul
mirage13–9-0.015%17 Jul
overpass9–130.0823%16 Jul
inferno13–80.053%16 Jul
dust213–30.0318%15 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0116%15 Jul
dust24–13-0.0542%14 Jul
mirage6–130.0227%14 Jul
inferno10–130.0720%14 Jul
inferno13–90.0020%14 Jul
mirage10–130.0320%13 Jul
dust213–110.0220%13 Jul
dust29–130.0519%13 Jul
inferno13–90.0311%13 Jul
inferno2–9-0.148%11 Jul
inferno9–20.0216%11 Jul
overpass9–130.038%11 Jul
dust213–50.0219%9 Jul
inferno13–80.0928%9 Jul
dust23–13-0.116%8 Jul
overpass13–70.0921%8 Jul
anubis8–130.0622%8 Jul
mirage11–130.0122%8 Jul
grail4–130.0225%7 Jul
ancient5–130.0222%7 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →