Quim'tarion Bartholomew

Quim'tarion Bartholomew — CS2 Stats

76561199010630350[U:1:1050364622]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,303Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 9 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

9,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2026-05-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning47
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY503812Last 10050%Win rateLWWWLWLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility2.7
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.7
Utility2.7
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time516ms−99ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 9 Jun
38%Best headshot accuracy · 8–4 · cache, 2 Jun
375msFastest reaction time · 11–3 · dust2, 20 Aug
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 29 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
39In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA55302555%-0.01
nukeA127558%0.02
dust2C104640%0.02
cacheS96367%-0.02
inferno31233%-0.03
vertigo3030%-0.03
anubis21150%0.02
office1010%-0.02
train1010%0.05
ancient1010%-0.01
shelter1010%-0.04
boulder110100%-0.01
overpass1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
28.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.6%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
508msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
39.8%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
5.46HE damage / grenade
3.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.3154 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4827% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0117%14 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0330%8 Sept
mirage13–60.0720%7 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0511%7 Sept
mirage9–130.0121%7 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0520%2 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0321%1 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0425%25 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0014%25 Aug
office8–13-0.025%20 Aug
dust211–30.029%20 Aug
mirage5–13-0.1215%16 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0521%15 Aug
dust27–13-0.0315%15 Aug
mirage13–70.0130%15 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0119%15 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0831%15 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0014%13 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0511%13 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0215%13 Aug
dust213–9-0.0120%12 Aug
dust214–160.049%12 Aug
cache13–10-0.0314%12 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0715%12 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0124%12 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0911%12 Aug
mirage13–3-0.009%12 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0915%11 Aug
mirage13–3-0.024%11 Aug
nuke13–50.1321%3 Aug
dust212–12-0.0024%3 Aug
nuke13–90.0117%2 Aug
mirage4–130.0425%2 Aug
train6–130.0523%31 Jul
mirage11–130.019%31 Jul
mirage13–30.0124%31 Jul
anubis4–13-0.027%30 Jul
dust214–16-0.0317%30 Jul
nuke13–60.1313%29 Jul
dust27–13-0.0120%29 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0118%29 Jul
mirage13–70.0919%29 Jul
nuke11–130.0420%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.1321%29 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0131%29 Jul
vertigo12–120.0016%29 Jul
nuke13–00.1020%29 Jul
mirage13–9-0.059%28 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0217%28 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0017%27 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0622%27 Jul
mirage13–7-0.036%27 Jul
mirage13–70.0521%27 Jul
mirage13–70.0223%27 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0419%27 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0615%27 Jul
mirage8–50.0413%27 Jul
nuke10–130.0624%26 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0010%26 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0621%26 Jul
mirage13–70.0315%26 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0118%23 Jul
mirage12–12-0.056%23 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0316%21 Jul
cache8–13-0.0318%21 Jul
vertigo7–13-0.0621%20 Jul
shelter11–13-0.0417%19 Jul
nuke9–13-0.044%18 Jul
dust215–150.0215%15 Jul
mirage7–13-0.028%15 Jul
anubis13–100.0624%12 Jul
mirage12–120.0712%12 Jul
nuke13–30.0511%12 Jul
cache13–110.0118%12 Jul
boulder13–10-0.0121%9 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0516%1 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0213%25 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0426%25 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0523%25 Jun
mirage12–120.0016%23 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0211%18 Jun
mirage10–130.0512%17 Jun
vertigo2–13-0.0430%16 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0723%16 Jun
mirage13–50.0321%12 Jun
mirage12–120.0622%10 Jun
dust213–70.1514%9 Jun
mirage10–130.0411%9 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0413%7 Jun
mirage13–90.0516%6 Jun
dust213–100.0723%3 Jun
cache8–4-0.0338%2 Jun
cache13–60.0116%31 May
cache9–130.0119%28 May
mirage12–120.0217%20 May
cache13–11-0.0516%20 May
mirage9–130.0314%18 May
mirage12–12-0.0413%18 May
cache6–13-0.1014%16 May
cache13–70.0727%9 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →