c

c — CS2 Stats

VA76561199008643721[U:1:1048377993]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

431Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,624Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,401Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16098 of 220642 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 431 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 4 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,401 +6,934 5 Jun10 Sept · 23 days played
18,46725,401peak 25,4015 Jun10 Sept
25,401Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-06-04

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,401
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • +5,689 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,599 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,040), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate52.8%44.9%45.8%above
Shot accuracy9.1%12.4%12.7%3.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.041.050.10 short
Match win rate50.4%45.3%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER25,401 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning62
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57385Last 10057%Win rateTTLLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 122 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 469ms

Last 10

  • 532 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 20

  • 1172 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility4.3
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.2
Utility4.3
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time527ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%−4.6%
first ⅓ avg 27.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.47Best match rating · 9–1 · poseidon, 8 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 5 Jun
344msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · nuke, 16 Jul
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 19 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 15dust2Weakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA29181162%0.04
anubisS1511473%0.03
dust2C135838%0.06
cacheB105550%0.04
nukeA106460%0.03
infernoA95456%-0.01
ancientA85363%0.03
vertigo2020%0.03
overpass21150%-0.00
train1010%-0.00
poseidon110100%0.47

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

101,915Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
2,385Matches
50.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
52.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
9.1%Shot accuracy
11,999MVPs
1,624Hours (in match)
2,531Bombs planted
1,289Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,095
AWP16,236
P2502,325
SSG 081,577
MP91,373

Lifetime map wins

4,214inferno
3,105dust2
2,681cbble
1,315nuke
1,033train
877vertigo
139office
101italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

279Matches
53%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
86.1ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2045%1.1317.0
Dust21050%1.2715.8
Inferno771%1.4616.7
Anubis580%2.0417.0
Ancient580%1.4717.0
Overpass475%1.2317.0
Vertigo30%1.3820.7
Nuke367%0.9817.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
88.9%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
521msReaction time
44.7%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
11.10HE damage / grenade
2.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4459 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo8–80.0124%29 Aug
inferno12–120.0616%28 Aug
anubis5–130.0513%28 Aug
dust25–130.0822%26 Aug
cache13–80.0119%26 Aug
nuke13–60.0417%23 Aug
anubis13–50.0931%23 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0123%8 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0611%7 Aug
mirage16–140.0223%3 Aug
anubis13–100.0517%3 Aug
ancient13–100.0519%3 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0418%30 Jul
cache13–20.1023%30 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0116%30 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0122%29 Jul
mirage13–70.0321%29 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0418%29 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0323%29 Jul
mirage13–50.0130%29 Jul
nuke13–70.0623%29 Jul
inferno13–50.1238%29 Jul
mirage13–50.0221%29 Jul
mirage13–60.1824%29 Jul
inferno0–10-0.1120%26 Jul
anubis13–60.1330%26 Jul
mirage11–130.0532%25 Jul
cache13–50.0823%25 Jul
nuke7–130.0132%25 Jul
cache13–20.1211%25 Jul
cache6–13-0.0128%25 Jul
dust27–130.0520%24 Jul
inferno13–40.0330%24 Jul
dust26–50.0031%23 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0121%23 Jul
mirage13–80.0620%20 Jul
cache13–20.1522%20 Jul
dust210–130.0318%20 Jul
anubis13–50.1128%20 Jul
cache11–13-0.0125%20 Jul
anubis13–110.0225%20 Jul
cache9–13-0.0225%20 Jul
mirage13–00.0346%19 Jul
cache12–160.0122%19 Jul
nuke13–30.0329%16 Jul
mirage7–130.1230%15 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0425%15 Jul
dust213–50.0340%15 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0815%15 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0518%9 Jul
train11–13-0.0032%4 Jul
dust213–80.2132%4 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0125%27 Jun
mirage13–110.0424%27 Jun
mirage13–80.1717%25 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0423%25 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0039%23 Jun
mirage13–50.0636%23 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0529%21 Jun
dust213–70.1017%16 Jun
dust28–130.0519%16 Jun
inferno13–90.0922%15 Jun
nuke2–9-0.1725%15 Jun
cache3–13-0.0325%15 Jun
vertigo7–130.0539%15 Jun
mirage13–70.1521%14 Jun
anubis13–60.0312%14 Jun
nuke13–60.0730%14 Jun
inferno13–80.0429%14 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0117%14 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0635%14 Jun
nuke13–60.0629%14 Jun
dust26–130.0122%13 Jun
anubis13–80.0127%13 Jun
anubis13–50.0517%13 Jun
ancient6–130.0637%13 Jun
mirage1–130.0036%13 Jun
nuke13–50.0821%13 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0033%13 Jun
dust215–15-0.0112%9 Jun
mirage13–00.1621%9 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0023%9 Jun
anubis13–50.0629%9 Jun
mirage13–30.0524%9 Jun
ancient13–70.0235%8 Jun
dust213–90.1425%8 Jun
mirage7–130.0828%8 Jun
dust24–130.0539%8 Jun
anubis13–100.0932%8 Jun
poseidon9–10.4733%8 Jun
overpass4–9-0.0315%8 Jun
ancient13–20.0830%6 Jun
overpass8–00.0218%6 Jun
dust26–13-0.0021%6 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0250%5 Jun
mirage15–150.0333%5 Jun
ancient13–100.0834%5 Jun
mirage13–40.1535%4 Jun
nuke8–80.0921%4 Jun
inferno0–9-0.300%4 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →