HenqpA

HenqpA — CS2 Stats

76561199003090345[U:1:1042824617]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,724Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,278Top 50% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#95927 of 259867 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,388 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,278 +3,763 23 Sept – 29 Oct · 12 days played
15,51519,278peak 19,27823 Sept29 Oct
19,278Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,388Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-09-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,388
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 143 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,278
  • +3,097 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 722 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHenqpAFACEITLevel 8 · 1,388 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,278 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,388csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning55
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateLLLWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility7.2
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.5
Utility7.2
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time539ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 20 Oct →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · italy, 7 Sept →
328msFastest reaction time · 1–4 · dust2, 21 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11cacheWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2510–1540%-0.03
nukeA1710–759%0.01
cacheD124–833%-0.00
anubisA127–558%0.01
mirageA116–555%-0.01
ancientA117–464%0.02
infernoA85–363%-0.01
rush_001—11–0100%0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.28
office—10–10%0.02
italy—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,273Matches
50%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
72.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis18049%1.0014.5
Ancient16252%0.9714.4
Dust216249%1.0014.4
Nuke15651%1.0815.4
Mirage13845%0.9414.1
Inferno11141%0.9314.0
Vertigo4356%0.9714.3
Train3628%0.8313.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
75.1%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
540msReaction time
23.0%T opening success
46.2%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
11.9%Flash assists
10.00HE damage / grenade
10.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.9546% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–13-0.0314%1 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0625%1 Nov →
inferno16–19-0.0717%31 Oct →
nuke13–110.0117%31 Oct →
mirage18–22-0.0411%31 Oct →
nuke11–130.0319%31 Oct →
anubis13–90.0429%31 Oct →
cache10–130.0416%31 Oct →
ancient13–90.0020%31 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.038%29 Oct →
dust213–90.0129%29 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.037%29 Oct →
mirage13–70.109%29 Oct →
nuke13–40.0914%29 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0422%22 Oct →
dust29–130.0220%22 Oct →
nuke16–120.0218%22 Oct →
inferno13–80.0427%22 Oct →
mirage13–110.0912%22 Oct →
nuke13–20.0919%22 Oct →
cache13–40.0410%22 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0126%22 Oct →
anubis13–60.0822%22 Oct →
cache19–17-0.0223%22 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0420%21 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0422%21 Oct →
inferno13–100.0120%21 Oct →
ancient13–50.1017%21 Oct →
cache7–13-0.019%21 Oct →
nuke13–80.0424%21 Oct →
anubis13–60.1432%21 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0023%21 Oct →
nuke7–130.0121%20 Oct →
cache13–50.1924%20 Oct →
ancient13–60.1131%20 Oct →
ancient13–50.1024%20 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0213%19 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0721%19 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0222%15 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0835%15 Oct →
anubis13–100.0520%13 Oct →
ancient15–150.0422%13 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0326%12 Oct →
inferno5–130.0223%12 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0218%11 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0410%11 Oct →
cache16–140.0115%11 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0111%7 Oct →
mirage13–100.0416%7 Oct →
dust20–9-0.060%7 Oct →
mirage0–7-0.050%3 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.049%3 Oct →
cache2–4-0.100%2 Oct →
rush_0018–40.010%2 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0526%2 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0413%2 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0432%2 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0914%2 Oct →
dust21–13-0.1120%2 Oct →
dust216–14-0.049%2 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0714%2 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0521%2 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0328%2 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0526%2 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0118%2 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0517%2 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0711%2 Oct →
ancient13–90.0110%2 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0419%2 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0611%2 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0212%2 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0215%2 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0818%2 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0517%2 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0331%2 Oct →
anubis10–130.0124%2 Oct →
inferno9–70.0117%2 Oct →
vertigo1–9-0.2820%2 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0524%30 Sept →
nuke11–130.0215%30 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0121%30 Sept →
nuke13–70.0818%28 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0315%28 Sept →
cache8–130.0112%27 Sept →
nuke11–130.0230%27 Sept →
ancient13–80.0417%25 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0413%23 Sept →
dust21–4-0.100%21 Sept →
office6–130.0222%21 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0026%17 Sept →
dust213–70.0022%16 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0917%16 Sept →
dust213–90.0722%15 Sept →
dust24–130.0010%14 Sept →
dust213–40.0326%14 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0315%10 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0623%9 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0232%9 Sept →
dust25–130.0033%8 Sept →
italy13–70.0537%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.