HenqpA

HenqpA — CS2 Stats

76561199003090345[U:1:1042824617]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,662Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,663Purple band · top ~17.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,388 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,663 +1,465 29 Jul – 13 Oct · 10 days played
15,51518,183peak 18,18329 Jul13 Oct
18,183Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,388Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-07-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,388
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 143 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 520 below peak (18,183)
  • +1,465 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,337 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHenqpAFACEITLevel 8 · 1,388 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,663 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,388csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32
Positioning53
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–52–7Last 10041%Win rateWTWLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −347ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 431ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim3.2
Utility5.4
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 61% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 50% on T to 33% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2
Positioning5.3
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time630ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy15.0%−7.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 8–8 · nuke, 29 Jul →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · dust2, 29 Jul →
328msFastest reaction time · 1–4 · dust2, 21 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 7cacheWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2610–1638%-0.02
nukeB136–746%0.00
anubisA116–555%-0.02
mirageC104–640%-0.04
ancientA95–456%0.01
cacheD71–614%-0.03
infernoA74–357%-0.01
officeD61–517%-0.00
italy—42–250%0.02
boulder—31–233%0.02
vertigo—20–20%-0.14
rush_001—11–0100%0.01
fachwerk—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,223Matches
50%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
71.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis17448%0.9814.3
Dust215651%1.0014.4
Ancient15451%0.9614.3
Nuke14750%1.0715.2
Mirage13146%0.9514.1
Inferno10842%0.9314.0
Vertigo4356%0.9714.3
Train3628%0.8313.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
25.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.8%Spray accuracy
72.3%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
639msReaction time
49.8%T opening success
32.5%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
5.32HE damage / grenade
10.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.5475% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–100.0520%13 Oct →
ancient15–150.0422%13 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0326%12 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0218%11 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0410%11 Oct →
cache16–140.0115%11 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0111%7 Oct →
mirage13–100.0416%7 Oct →
dust20–9-0.060%7 Oct →
mirage0–7-0.050%3 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.049%3 Oct →
cache2–4-0.100%2 Oct →
rush_0018–40.010%2 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0526%2 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0413%2 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0432%2 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0914%2 Oct →
dust21–13-0.1120%2 Oct →
dust216–14-0.049%2 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0714%2 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0521%2 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0328%2 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0526%2 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0118%2 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0517%2 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0711%2 Oct →
ancient13–90.0110%2 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0419%2 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0611%2 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0212%2 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0215%2 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0818%2 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0517%2 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0331%2 Oct →
anubis10–130.0124%2 Oct →
inferno9–70.0117%2 Oct →
vertigo1–9-0.2820%2 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0524%30 Sept →
nuke11–130.0215%30 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0121%30 Sept →
nuke13–70.0818%28 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0315%28 Sept →
cache8–130.0112%27 Sept →
nuke11–130.0230%27 Sept →
ancient13–80.0417%25 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0413%23 Sept →
dust21–4-0.100%21 Sept →
office6–130.0222%21 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0026%17 Sept →
dust213–70.0022%16 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0917%16 Sept →
dust213–90.0722%15 Sept →
dust24–130.0010%14 Sept →
dust213–40.0326%14 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0315%10 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0623%9 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0232%9 Sept →
dust25–130.0033%8 Sept →
italy13–70.0537%7 Sept →
dust29–130.0329%2 Sept →
boulder8–13-0.0342%30 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.059%30 Aug →
boulder12–12-0.0127%29 Aug →
office10–13-0.0221%29 Aug →
italy10–130.0630%29 Aug →
office13–90.0220%26 Aug →
italy6–13-0.0112%26 Aug →
fachwerk12–120.0419%24 Aug →
boulder13–20.0923%24 Aug →
italy13–4-0.019%24 Aug →
office9–13-0.0429%24 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0640%24 Aug →
mirage5–3-0.1317%24 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.0520%23 Aug →
dust23–130.0017%23 Aug →
dust20–4-0.0825%23 Aug →
dust26–130.0625%23 Aug →
office11–13-0.0116%23 Aug →
dust213–110.0330%23 Aug →
anubis13–70.017%18 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0316%17 Aug →
ancient13–100.0525%17 Aug →
dust213–30.0623%17 Aug →
cache6–130.0030%16 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0224%14 Aug →
vertigo6–13-0.0118%14 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0630%11 Aug →
ancient9–130.0013%10 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0318%10 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0129%10 Aug →
nuke13–60.0518%9 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0121%9 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0015%9 Aug →
ancient13–80.0123%2 Aug →
nuke8–80.1718%29 Jul →
office5–13-0.0015%29 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0228%29 Jul →
dust28–130.0448%29 Jul →
mirage10–130.0124%29 Jul →
inferno8–80.0315%28 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.