✪ LORD'︻デ 一•

✪ LORD'︻デ 一• — CS2 Stats

LB76561198996025954[U:1:1035760226]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

608Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,904Blue band · top ~44.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 11,904 → 11,904
+2Tracked matches · now 608
+6.9ppWin rate · 51.7% → 58.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 15 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,904 +1,329 15 Mar17 Sept · 46 days played
6,71214,201peak 14,20115 Mar17 Sept
14,624Peak Premier in tracked matches
46Days played since 2026-03-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,297 below peak (14,201)
  • -2,297 over 30 days · declining
  • +4,085 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,096 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ LORD'︻デ 一•FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER11,904 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning52
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52426Last 10052%Win rateWWWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.1
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time601ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 10 May
44%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · anubis, 3 May
406msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · inferno, 15 Jun
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 15 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 24infernoWeakest map · 42% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC24101442%0.01
dust2S2416867%0.01
mirageB20101050%0.01
ancientA1810856%0.00
anubisA95456%-0.00
overpass3030%-0.00
nuke21150%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

20Matches
50%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
66.2ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage633%0.7412.7
Dust2450%1.2215.0
Anubis475%1.0314.5
Ancient250%0.7212.5
Vertigo250%0.7613.0
Inferno250%0.7815.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
67.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
576msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
8.62HE damage / grenade
9.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4712 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.581% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0225%17 Sept
dust213–90.0816%17 Sept
inferno13–3-0.0018%13 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0623%13 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0215%13 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0221%12 Sept
dust26–130.0025%12 Sept
inferno13–60.0522%12 Sept
ancient13–100.0220%11 Sept
mirage13–100.0017%11 Sept
inferno13–30.0329%11 Sept
mirage13–30.0413%11 Sept
ancient13–110.0516%9 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0110%9 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0119%6 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0514%5 Sept
inferno6–130.0912%5 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0714%5 Sept
ancient13–110.0719%30 Aug
mirage13–40.0818%30 Aug
inferno13–70.033%30 Aug
inferno6–130.0113%28 Aug
anubis13–110.0221%28 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0110%23 Aug
dust213–60.0918%23 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0216%23 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0311%23 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0613%23 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0514%22 Aug
ancient15–150.0119%21 Aug
mirage10–130.0522%20 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0021%20 Aug
mirage13–70.0319%16 Aug
ancient10–130.0013%16 Aug
dust216–13-0.0317%16 Aug
dust213–6-0.0517%16 Aug
dust216–120.0312%14 Aug
dust213–70.0629%14 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0311%13 Aug
ancient13–90.0317%9 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0210%9 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0317%9 Aug
dust213–7-0.0519%9 Aug
dust211–130.0131%8 Aug
mirage2–130.0723%8 Aug
ancient13–60.0011%7 Aug
inferno10–130.0012%7 Aug
dust26–13-0.0324%7 Aug
ancient13–16-0.069%2 Aug
dust213–80.0418%1 Aug
inferno12–16-0.054%25 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0116%25 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0112%25 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0120%22 Jul
dust213–7-0.037%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0113%21 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0410%19 Jul
dust215–150.0222%19 Jul
anubis4–11-0.050%17 Jul
dust213–50.0127%17 Jul
inferno13–30.0414%17 Jul
dust213–50.0426%17 Jul
ancient13–70.089%11 Jul
inferno13–10-0.074%10 Jul
inferno13–50.0122%9 Jul
ancient13–160.0114%9 Jul
dust213–60.0421%5 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0018%28 Jun
dust210–13-0.0024%27 Jun
mirage13–80.0518%27 Jun
anubis13–50.0823%21 Jun
inferno13–0-0.010%15 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0839%15 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0433%2 Jun
dust213–70.0524%29 May
dust213–11-0.0022%29 May
mirage13–60.010%28 May
dust27–130.018%28 May
inferno11–130.0318%28 May
inferno15–150.0823%28 May
mirage9–130.0312%28 May
dust213–11-0.0131%28 May
overpass8–130.0418%28 May
inferno16–13-0.0125%27 May
mirage16–130.0618%27 May
dust213–50.0142%27 May
mirage13–80.0525%27 May
inferno11–130.0341%24 May
nuke13–30.2027%10 May
mirage9–13-0.028%3 May
inferno3–13-0.0312%3 May
ancient13–40.0113%3 May
overpass15–150.0419%3 May
anubis4–130.0144%3 May
mirage13–16-0.0413%19 Apr
anubis13–10-0.018%19 Apr
anubis13–40.0132%28 Mar
dust29–13-0.0219%23 Mar
inferno15–150.0324%21 Mar
mirage13–60.0214%15 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →