Owando — CS2 Stats

76561198991545756[U:1:1031280028]

953Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,527Purple band · top ~10.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9827 of 21264 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,586 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOwandoFACEITLevel 8 · 1,586 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,527 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning60
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43525Last 10043%Win rateWWLWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0
Aggression7.3
Utility3.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.0
Utility3.9
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time568ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy27.2%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 27.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.44Best rating — inferno 9–1
131Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 53% over 15infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B22111150%0.01
ancientC1981142%0.01
cacheD1651131%0.02
anubisB158753%-0.01
mirageB115645%-0.01
nukeD93633%-0.00
infernoD72529%0.08
vertigo110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

305Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
86.1ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust28540%1.1117.6
Mirage7254%1.0717.8
Ancient4560%1.2317.7
Anubis3964%1.2817.1
Inferno2045%0.8613.8
Cache1547%1.1418.1
Nuke1471%1.4419.7
Overpass1145%1.2120.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.4%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
90.1%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
556msReaction time
39.7%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
11.64HE damage / grenade
3.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.2115 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6891% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0425%29 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0216%28 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0714%26 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0223%26 Aug
dust211–13-0.0227%26 Aug
cache6–13-0.0327%26 Aug
ancient13–80.0432%26 Aug
cache13–60.0232%26 Aug
cache4–13-0.0724%25 Aug
mirage13–110.0329%21 Aug
dust28–130.0320%21 Aug
dust213–110.0426%20 Aug
dust25–130.0337%17 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0214%17 Aug
ancient10–130.0526%17 Aug
anubis13–90.0631%17 Aug
inferno13–60.0128%15 Aug
mirage8–130.0141%14 Aug
nuke13–90.0627%14 Aug
ancient14–160.0431%14 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0515%11 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0324%11 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0424%11 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0323%10 Aug
ancient13–70.0119%10 Aug
inferno14–160.0522%10 Aug
dust213–100.0338%10 Aug
vertigo13–100.0730%9 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0118%8 Aug
anubis7–130.0146%8 Aug
dust29–13-0.0222%7 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0231%7 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0856%2 Aug
cache13–90.1139%2 Aug
dust25–13-0.0336%2 Aug
mirage4–130.0116%2 Aug
ancient10–130.0230%1 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0034%1 Aug
ancient7–130.0834%1 Aug
dust213–80.0636%1 Aug
dust213–60.0727%1 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0241%1 Aug
nuke13–110.0042%31 Jul
mirage13–110.0336%31 Jul
dust23–13-0.0327%30 Jul
inferno9–10.4448%30 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0515%29 Jul
ancient13–50.0332%29 Jul
dust216–12-0.0236%29 Jul
anubis13–90.0231%29 Jul
ancient8–1-0.024%29 Jul
inferno15–150.0126%29 Jul
cache10–13-0.0147%29 Jul
cache12–12-0.0434%28 Jul
ancient10–130.0120%27 Jul
cache8–130.0235%27 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0817%27 Jul
dust213–10-0.0224%27 Jul
dust211–130.0328%27 Jul
ancient11–130.0620%27 Jul
dust215–150.0426%27 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0115%27 Jul
nuke4–130.0925%26 Jul
ancient13–110.0224%26 Jul
cache13–80.0626%26 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0141%25 Jul
cache14–160.0427%25 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0040%25 Jul
cache13–10.1628%25 Jul
inferno4–130.0438%24 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0710%24 Jul
anubis13–60.0632%24 Jul
anubis13–40.0020%21 Jul
dust213–100.0424%21 Jul
inferno10–130.0322%21 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0347%21 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0614%20 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0516%19 Jul
dust24–13-0.0610%19 Jul
dust25–13-0.0816%19 Jul
dust213–8-0.0023%19 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0230%19 Jul
ancient13–70.0133%17 Jul
cache11–130.0122%17 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0112%17 Jul
mirage13–60.0235%16 Jul
dust213–80.0334%16 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0414%15 Jul
dust216–130.0219%15 Jul
cache6–13-0.0317%10 Jul
anubis11–130.0035%10 Jul
ancient11–130.0426%10 Jul
ancient13–90.0424%10 Jul
mirage13–80.0522%10 Jul
dust28–13-0.0313%10 Jul
cache8–13-0.0023%10 Jul
cache13–80.1023%10 Jul
cache8–13-0.0219%10 Jul
dust216–140.0419%9 Jul
cache8–13-0.0129%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →