💀💀💀 — CS2 Stats

76561198983690720[U:1:1023424992]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,981Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating20,989Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#61951 of 225591 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,981 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 3 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,989 +357 13 Aug – 14 Sept · 13 days played

21,731Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,981Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

43Days played since 2026-07-03

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,981
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 20 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-05
Level 8 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

742 below peak (21,731)
-576 over 30 days · declining
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,011 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-05
Purple band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69

Positioning45

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateLWWWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · +15ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 574ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

9–11 · 45% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.9

Utility5.5

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels0.8

Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9

Positioning4.5

Utility5.5

Mechanics5.7

Opening Duels0.9

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time546ms+1ms

first ⅓ avg 545ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms

Headshot accuracy17.0%−1.5%

first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 23 Jul →

45%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · inferno, 11 Aug →

406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 21 Aug →

13–0Biggest win · anubis, 11 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak

9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 20ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	20	15–5	75%	-0.01
mirage	C	17	7–10	41%	-0.00
nuke	B	16	8–8	50%	-0.01
anubis	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.04
cache	B	12	6–6	50%	0.05
ancient	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.01
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
vertigo	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01
aim_map_faceit	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.61
mst_pistolmap_ver2.0	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.39

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,760Matches

51%Win rate

1.05Avg K/D

71.4ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	257	42%	0.92	13.0
Anubis	163	57%	0.95	14.3
Nuke	156	55%	0.98	13.7
Inferno	146	45%	1.03	14.7
Dust2	145	56%	1.03	14.6
Ancient	118	50%	0.97	14.8
Vertigo	58	47%	1.01	15.0
Overpass	14	43%	0.91	12.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy

34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.8%Spray accuracy

75.8%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

546msReaction time

36.5%T opening success

30.8%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

6.7%Flash assists

8.87HE damage / grenade

9.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.5429% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	11–13	0.03	30%	14 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.03	26%	11 Sept →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	13%	10 Sept →
nuke	16–14	-0.03	24%	10 Sept →
nuke	14–16	-0.03	15%	7 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	2%	7 Sept →
anubis	3–13	-0.07	20%	7 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	16%	5 Sept →
ancient	3–13	-0.03	20%	5 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.06	17%	5 Sept →
cache	13–10	0.02	26%	5 Sept →
vertigo	14–16	-0.02	12%	3 Sept →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	8%	30 Aug →
vertigo	19–17	-0.01	12%	30 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	28%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	18%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	16%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–16	0.01	14%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.06	18%	29 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	17%	29 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	16%	29 Aug →
vertigo	5–13	0.01	14%	28 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.01	13%	28 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	16%	27 Aug →
cache	13–16	0.03	16%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.02	19%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	20%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.04	9%	23 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.07	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	23%	23 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	11%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.00	18%	23 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.10	14%	21 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.02	24%	21 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.01	15%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	14%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	25%	20 Aug →
anubis	16–19	-0.04	23%	20 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.00	23%	19 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	23%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.01	30%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	11%	17 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.05	25%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	29%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	21%	15 Aug →
anubis	16–12	-0.03	16%	15 Aug →
vertigo	13–3	-0.02	13%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.08	18%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	18%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	18%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	27%	13 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	26%	12 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.12	22%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–2	-0.02	16%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–0	-0.04	20%	11 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.09	45%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	23%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	24%	8 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	20%	8 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	20%	4 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	19%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.05	19%	2 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	26%	2 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	21%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	22%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.06	23%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.00	16%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	16%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.02	33%	31 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	23%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	19%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	10%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.00	11%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.12	11%	23 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.04	22%	22 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	25%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.05	34%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	20%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.08	18%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–16	0.03	32%	18 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	14%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.02	16%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	13%	18 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.00	22%	17 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.01	32%	15 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.07	17%	15 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	17%	15 Jul →
nuke	23–25	-0.05	17%	15 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.11	17%	14 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.09	22%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.06	27%	11 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.03	15%	8 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.01	32%	8 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.11	16%	8 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.01	17%	5 Jul →
aim_map_faceit	0–13	-0.61	0%	4 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.04	15%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	15%	4 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.06	11%	4 Jul →
mst_pistolmap_ver2.0	0–13	-0.39	0%	3 Jul →