möyg

möyg — CS2 Stats

76561198983634555[U:1:1023368827]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,454Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,587Purple band · top ~14.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26459 of 58237 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

18,587Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,587
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,413 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmöygFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER18,587 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning35
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48484Last 10048%Win rateLWWWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression3.6
Utility5.0
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning3.5
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time628ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 628ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–1
130Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 72% over 18mirageWeakest map · 32% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2271532%-0.02
cacheA1912763%-0.02
dust2C1871139%-0.03
nukeS1813572%-0.02
infernoC83538%-0.03
ancientC52340%-0.03
anubis31233%-0.04
vertigo32167%-0.06
poseidon1010%-0.06
train110100%-0.04
boulder1010%-0.05
fachwerk1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

94Matches
44%Win rate
0.70Avg K/D
55.9ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke250%0.5412.5
Mirage250%0.5210.5
Dust210%0.447.0
Anubis10%0.547.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
629msReaction time
16.9%T opening success
40.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
6.97HE damage / grenade
5.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.9244% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.084%25 Aug
cache13–40.0216%25 Aug
dust213–4-0.0825%25 Aug
nuke13–70.1119%25 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0815%25 Aug
cache6–13-0.0422%25 Aug
dust26–13-0.0531%25 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0115%21 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0310%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.0321%21 Aug
poseidon8–8-0.0617%20 Aug
dust213–8-0.0525%20 Aug
cache2–13-0.0920%16 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0420%16 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0111%16 Aug
train13–10-0.0419%15 Aug
cache13–9-0.0110%15 Aug
mirage13–40.075%15 Aug
dust28–13-0.0425%15 Aug
cache7–13-0.0214%13 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0613%13 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0611%12 Aug
dust211–13-0.0217%12 Aug
mirage2–7-0.0417%12 Aug
inferno4–13-0.085%12 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0320%12 Aug
boulder6–13-0.0510%11 Aug
fachwerk12–12-0.0513%11 Aug
cache16–14-0.019%11 Aug
cache13–3-0.026%11 Aug
nuke13–3-0.1018%11 Aug
nuke13–60.009%11 Aug
dust213–3-0.0421%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.0216%10 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0512%10 Aug
cache13–20.0031%10 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0322%10 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0512%10 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0332%4 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0831%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0925%3 Aug
cache13–3-0.0617%3 Aug
nuke13–0-0.0715%3 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0326%2 Aug
mirage13–10.1311%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0612%2 Aug
cache13–5-0.0214%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.0211%2 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0416%2 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.055%2 Aug
cache10–13-0.076%2 Aug
dust213–4-0.1018%2 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0321%2 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0417%2 Aug
nuke13–10.0728%2 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0522%1 Aug
mirage9–13-0.1130%1 Aug
dust28–13-0.0214%1 Aug
nuke13–30.0418%1 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0812%31 Jul
mirage11–130.0319%31 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0517%31 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0616%31 Jul
ancient13–9-0.059%31 Jul
mirage13–20.089%31 Jul
anubis13–6-0.046%31 Jul
cache12–12-0.0324%30 Jul
cache13–50.0318%30 Jul
cache13–10-0.048%28 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0222%27 Jul
cache13–70.0413%27 Jul
dust29–13-0.0223%27 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0512%27 Jul
inferno13–100.0011%27 Jul
dust25–13-0.0614%27 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0331%27 Jul
dust22–11-0.0514%26 Jul
mirage6–130.0016%26 Jul
dust214–16-0.0214%26 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0118%26 Jul
ancient13–90.0615%24 Jul
dust213–10-0.0118%24 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0923%23 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0425%23 Jul
cache13–4-0.0211%23 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0113%23 Jul
cache13–11-0.0111%23 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0028%23 Jul
dust213–11-0.0319%23 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0234%23 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0729%20 Jul
nuke11–130.0119%18 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0412%18 Jul
cache7–13-0.0117%18 Jul
dust210–130.1120%18 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0413%18 Jul
nuke4–9-0.1312%18 Jul
inferno8–13-0.044%18 Jul
cache7–130.0336%18 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0120%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →