Air_Labs

Air_Labs — CS2 Stats

UM76561198980198241[U:1:1019932513]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

783Tracked matches83%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,470Purple band · top ~14.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#91867 of 220537 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 783 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 27 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,470 +3,471 20 Mar12 Sept · 19 days played
14,76819,423peak 19,42320 Mar12 Sept
19,423Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-02-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 953 below peak (19,423)
  • 0 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,530 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAir_LabsFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,470 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning58
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT70264Last 10070%Win rateWWWWWWWTTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.09 avg rating · −9.8pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 700ms

Last 10

  • 802 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 690ms

Last 20

  • 1613 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 707ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility4.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 696ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.8
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.06
Reaction time689ms+56ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 689ms
Headshot accuracy28.3%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 26.7% → last ⅓ avg 28.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 6–0 · inferno, 11 Jun
59%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · mirage, 25 Mar
422msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · anubis, 11 Jun
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 11 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
114In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 86% over 7mirageWeakest map · 53% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA1610663%0.04
ancientS1611569%0.01
mirageB158753%0.01
nukeS1311285%0.04
dust2S128467%0.04
anubisS119282%0.06
overpassS76186%0.05
cacheA53260%0.03
vertigoS54180%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (53% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
50%Win rate
0.70Avg K/D
75.5ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno333%0.679.0
Mirage250%0.5310.5
Ancient10%0.5310.0
Anubis1100%1.4516.0
Dust21100%0.509.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
696msReaction time
35.7%T opening success
57.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
13.3%Flash assists
7.50HE damage / grenade
3.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4692 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.732% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–100.0115%3 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0314%17 Jul
cache13–80.0213%15 Jul
nuke13–6-0.049%13 Jul
inferno13–7-0.017%12 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0410%10 Jul
inferno9–10.1720%11 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0435%11 Jun
vertigo8–8-0.0127%11 Jun
nuke9–30.0059%11 Jun
vertigo9–30.1631%11 Jun
nuke9–6-0.0029%11 Jun
inferno9–00.2550%11 Jun
inferno8–80.0223%11 Jun
inferno9–30.1228%11 Jun
inferno6–00.2617%11 Jun
inferno9–00.0650%11 Jun
cache5–130.0137%11 Jun
overpass13–00.0917%11 Jun
dust213–100.0228%11 Jun
dust213–50.1140%11 Jun
anubis13–00.1745%11 Jun
mirage13–80.1238%11 Jun
mirage12–120.1234%11 Jun
dust29–130.0731%11 Jun
cache13–70.1244%11 Jun
ancient13–20.1222%11 Jun
vertigo13–70.0934%11 Jun
cache13–110.0529%11 Jun
mirage13–50.0627%11 Jun
nuke11–20.0126%11 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0428%10 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0114%10 Jun
inferno5–13-0.1021%5 Jun
anubis13–80.0413%5 Jun
cache10–13-0.0618%8 May
mirage13–7-0.0114%6 May
anubis13–11-0.0412%17 Apr
dust213–60.0016%17 Apr
ancient13–60.019%17 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0610%17 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0211%15 Apr
mirage5–13-0.100%10 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0515%10 Apr
vertigo13–90.0012%10 Apr
vertigo13–100.029%10 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0110%10 Apr
ancient13–8-0.027%10 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0410%10 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0115%10 Apr
ancient13–8-0.077%9 Apr
anubis13–5-0.012%9 Apr
dust213–11-0.099%9 Apr
mirage13–80.0922%8 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0321%8 Apr
ancient10–130.0325%8 Apr
anubis13–90.1115%8 Apr
anubis13–7-0.038%7 Apr
overpass13–70.0246%6 Apr
dust29–130.0322%6 Apr
ancient13–110.1132%2 Apr
mirage13–50.019%1 Apr
anubis7–130.0113%1 Apr
ancient13–110.0419%1 Apr
ancient12–20.0339%1 Apr
nuke16–14-0.0222%31 Mar
nuke13–10.1635%31 Mar
inferno8–130.0324%31 Mar
dust210–130.1025%31 Mar
nuke13–4-0.0121%31 Mar
ancient13–100.0521%30 Mar
dust29–130.0132%30 Mar
nuke13–40.1032%30 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0114%27 Mar
inferno7–13-0.029%27 Mar
anubis13–40.1048%26 Mar
overpass7–130.0224%26 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0128%26 Mar
dust213–70.0726%26 Mar
inferno11–130.0218%26 Mar
anubis13–90.0122%26 Mar
nuke13–110.0223%26 Mar
mirage13–40.1133%26 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0159%25 Mar
anubis11–130.0931%25 Mar
anubis13–30.1535%25 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0126%24 Mar
nuke13–30.1537%24 Mar
overpass13–110.0237%24 Mar
mirage7–130.0623%22 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0831%22 Mar
overpass13–30.2129%20 Mar
dust213–60.1039%20 Mar
nuke6–130.1029%20 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0133%20 Mar
dust213–110.0115%15 Mar
overpass13–50.0121%13 Mar
dust213–110.0011%11 Mar
ancient3–13-0.1117%27 Feb
inferno13–80.058%27 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →