Janpaan

Janpaan — CS2 Stats

GE76561198973944354[U:1:1013678626]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,323Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,890Blue band · top ~29% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 18 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,890 -1,058 18 May8 Sept · 7 days played
13,73915,948peak 15,94818 May8 Sept
16,279Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-05-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,058 below peak (15,948)
  • +1,151 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 110 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJanpaanFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,890 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning52
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48457Last 10048%Win rateWLLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility3.4
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.2
Utility3.4
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time538ms−89ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 9–2 · debris, 21 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · warden, 23 May
367msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 1 Sept
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 25 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
wardenA25151060%0.02
infernoS118373%0.01
ancientC94544%-0.01
officeB84450%-0.00
anubisS75271%-0.01
mirageD62433%-0.00
shelterD62433%-0.02
cache4040%-0.05
fachwerk42250%0.02
debris31233%0.02
italy31233%-0.03
dust22020%-0.03
vertigo21150%0.04
alpine2020%-0.01
poseidon220100%0.12
nuke21150%0.08
boulder1010%0.02
overpass1010%0.03
sanctum1010%-0.02
stronghold1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

35Matches
54%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
562msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
8.65HE damage / grenade
2.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4145 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.0395% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–100.0119%9 Sept
cache4–13-0.038%8 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0316%8 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0231%8 Sept
anubis13–7-0.027%8 Sept
mirage10–130.0512%8 Sept
inferno13–40.0314%3 Sept
mirage8–130.0016%3 Sept
mirage10–130.0115%1 Sept
cache6–13-0.078%1 Sept
ancient6–13-0.017%1 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0710%31 Aug
dust212–16-0.0714%31 Aug
ancient13–40.0223%31 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0115%31 Aug
anubis13–100.0718%29 Aug
cache4–13-0.0722%29 Aug
inferno13–100.0318%29 Aug
mirage15–150.0220%25 Aug
inferno13–2-0.0017%25 Aug
inferno13–40.0021%25 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0312%25 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0231%24 Aug
cache14–16-0.0319%24 Aug
office8–13-0.0725%21 Aug
anubis13–6-0.007%21 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0328%21 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0215%21 Aug
debris9–20.2818%21 Aug
debris0–9-0.260%21 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0510%17 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0013%17 Aug
shelter8–12-0.0224%15 Jul
shelter8–2-0.0311%15 Jul
shelter11–130.017%14 Jul
fachwerk13–20.0624%14 Jul
fachwerk13–110.0714%14 Jul
office13–10-0.0111%14 Jul
office13–70.0424%13 Jul
shelter0–13-0.100%13 Jul
fachwerk8–13-0.0118%13 Jul
debris5–90.0218%13 Jul
fachwerk12–12-0.0615%12 Jul
boulder8–130.0223%12 Jul
shelter11–13-0.0220%12 Jul
shelter13–40.0615%12 Jul
warden6–00.1631%6 Jul
office2–70.0921%28 Jun
warden12–12-0.027%28 Jun
warden0–130.0045%28 Jun
warden13–30.1212%22 Jun
warden4–13-0.0313%22 Jun
anubis13–80.0113%21 Jun
warden12–120.0719%21 Jun
ancient6–130.0711%12 Jun
overpass8–130.0315%12 Jun
anubis8–130.0130%12 Jun
warden13–30.0319%12 Jun
italy13–90.0317%9 Jun
warden13–11-0.0129%9 Jun
alpine4–13-0.020%8 Jun
warden13–6-0.0116%8 Jun
warden12–120.0318%8 Jun
office5–13-0.0415%6 Jun
warden3–13-0.0026%6 Jun
warden6–130.0126%6 Jun
warden13–80.049%1 Jun
warden13–100.0414%1 Jun
warden13–60.1532%30 May
italy7–13-0.1118%29 May
warden13–8-0.0113%29 May
warden8–13-0.0310%29 May
warden13–100.0017%29 May
warden5–0-0.0025%29 May
anubis13–10-0.0324%27 May
warden13–10-0.0223%27 May
inferno8–8-0.0311%26 May
poseidon9–40.1718%26 May
nuke9–70.2222%26 May
warden11–13-0.0020%23 May
warden13–50.0250%23 May
office13–8-0.0110%22 May
inferno2–130.0339%22 May
inferno13–7-0.0421%22 May
mirage13–7-0.0319%22 May
sanctum7–9-0.0211%21 May
nuke5–9-0.0723%21 May
vertigo9–50.0812%21 May
poseidon9–70.0712%20 May
inferno9–40.0920%20 May
alpine7–130.0119%20 May
italy4–13-0.0221%19 May
warden8–13-0.0425%19 May
stronghold6–13-0.0413%19 May
anubis2–9-0.086%19 May
inferno13–11-0.0316%19 May
warden13–50.0318%18 May
warden13–50.0113%18 May
office12–12-0.0429%18 May
dust213–160.0226%18 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →