Toxic

Toxic — CS2 Stats

PT76561198968588004[U:1:1008322276]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

8,285Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,782Top 10% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1429 of 27939 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,380 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGToxicFACEITLevel 10 · 3,380 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,782 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning69
Utility81

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT6040Last 10060%Win rateWWWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5
Aggression8.9
Utility8.1
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Utility. Utility score of 81 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.9
Utility8.1
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time541ms−130ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy27.3%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 28.9% → last ⅓ avg 27.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–1
131Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 26nukeWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A27161159%0.01
ancientS2618869%0.03
anubisS1711665%0.01
infernoA127558%0.02
mirageC94544%0.01
nukeC73443%-0.01
cache110100%0.01
overpass1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

12,227Matches
52%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
82.8ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient241956%1.1817.3
Anubis148452%1.1217.0
Mirage141950%1.1617.0
Dust2127050%1.0515.8
Inferno75354%1.1616.5
Nuke39749%1.0516.0
Train24252%1.1316.7
Vertigo18153%1.2018.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.8%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
76.0%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
541msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
61.8%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
18.3%Flash assists
8.77HE damage / grenade
17.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.8301% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.0221%28 Aug
ancient13–40.0818%26 Aug
anubis13–50.0623%25 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0713%24 Aug
cache13–110.0117%23 Aug
dust210–13-0.0521%22 Aug
inferno13–110.0537%22 Aug
ancient13–80.0222%21 Aug
ancient13–110.0124%17 Aug
dust213–60.0638%16 Aug
nuke23–250.0230%12 Aug
dust219–160.0025%10 Aug
ancient13–100.0422%6 Aug
inferno13–70.0831%29 Jul
mirage16–140.0237%27 Jul
dust29–130.0125%24 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0133%22 Jul
ancient13–100.0527%19 Jul
anubis13–50.0127%16 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0138%9 Jul
inferno16–140.0436%7 Jul
anubis13–40.0829%6 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0119%1 Jul
dust20–13-0.0878%30 Jun
ancient13–2-0.0321%29 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0512%24 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0625%24 Jun
ancient13–10.0819%17 Jun
dust216–14-0.0019%13 Jun
dust25–13-0.0757%10 Jun
anubis16–19-0.0322%8 Jun
dust213–6-0.0118%6 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0519%6 Jun
ancient13–40.0218%6 Jun
ancient2–13-0.1022%6 Jun
ancient13–50.0522%5 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0330%28 May
anubis13–40.0427%11 May
dust213–40.0732%8 May
dust25–13-0.0726%3 May
dust210–13-0.0017%25 Apr
ancient13–100.0421%20 Apr
ancient15–19-0.0331%20 Apr
ancient4–13-0.1131%17 Apr
dust210–13-0.0418%16 Apr
anubis13–100.0530%14 Apr
dust213–90.0736%12 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0835%8 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0835%8 Apr
ancient16–140.0530%8 Apr
dust216–130.0431%7 Apr
dust210–13-0.0622%6 Apr
nuke13–90.0421%4 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0023%31 Mar
inferno11–30.1131%29 Mar
overpass2–13-0.0428%29 Mar
anubis13–40.0728%28 Mar
ancient13–10.1541%28 Mar
ancient7–130.0438%28 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0720%28 Mar
mirage3–3-0.0020%28 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0022%27 Mar
dust213–100.0925%27 Mar
ancient10–130.0442%27 Mar
anubis13–60.0338%27 Mar
dust213–2-0.0017%26 Mar
ancient13–90.1230%26 Mar
dust211–130.0444%26 Mar
mirage13–90.0832%25 Mar
mirage13–90.0537%25 Mar
nuke10–130.0728%25 Mar
dust213–60.0435%23 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0128%23 Mar
ancient13–20.1229%23 Mar
dust213–110.0931%21 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0138%20 Mar
mirage13–40.0829%19 Mar
dust210–130.0430%18 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0614%17 Mar
anubis13–60.0124%16 Mar
inferno13–90.0134%16 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0926%16 Mar
ancient2–7-0.0226%14 Mar
dust27–00.1030%14 Mar
anubis11–130.0325%14 Mar
dust211–13-0.0520%13 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0332%13 Mar
dust213–6-0.0438%13 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0521%12 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0123%12 Mar
dust213–50.0326%12 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0324%8 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0423%7 Mar
dust213–60.1028%7 Mar
dust213–9-0.0229%6 Mar
ancient13–100.0524%6 Mar
anubis7–20.0529%5 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0029%5 Mar
inferno13–40.0529%4 Mar
ancient13–80.1238%4 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →