Trey Watson — CS2 Stats

76561198963327645[U:1:1003061917]Steam profile ↗

1,442Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating28,905Top 5% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#283 of 28889 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,091 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning54

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–36–4Last 10060%Win rateWTWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1

Aggression6.4

Utility3.1

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.8

Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.4

Utility3.1

Mechanics6.1

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time575ms+10ms

first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms

Headshot accuracy23.8%+2.9%

first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — train 4–0

13–1Biggest win — mirage

8Longest win streak

10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 68% over 19dust2Weakest map · 44% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	29	17–12	59%	-0.01
cache	A	19	11–8	58%	-0.01
nuke	S	19	13–6	68%	0.00
dust2	C	16	7–9	44%	-0.02
anubis	A	11	7–4	64%	0.03
ancient	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.01
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.14
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

681Matches

61%Win rate

0.88Avg K/D

66.0ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	238	70%	0.92	12.8
Anubis	102	62%	0.89	12.1
Nuke	76	62%	0.91	13.8
Ancient	51	49%	0.82	12.7
Train	27	63%	0.79	11.6
Dust2	26	54%	0.96	14.1
Cache	22	64%	0.94	13.4
Inferno	18	61%	0.84	13.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy

37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.5%Spray accuracy

77.5%Counter-strafing

10.0°Preaim

546msReaction time

36.1%T opening success

46.5%CT opening success

0.41Enemies flashed / flash

5.7%Flash assists

5.14HE damage / grenade

3.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4136 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.1361% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–1	0.03	38%	28 Aug →
anubis	12–12	0.02	15%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	26%	28 Aug →
train	4–0	0.14	33%	28 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	20%	26 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.03	11%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	27%	26 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.05	17%	25 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.06	22%	25 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.01	33%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.06	35%	24 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.14	0%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	32%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	16%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	28%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	32%	22 Aug →
nuke	3–0	-0.01	20%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	19%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.05	20%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.02	18%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–16	0.01	24%	22 Aug →
mirage	2–0	0.08	50%	22 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	23%	22 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.07	24%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	28%	22 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.02	20%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.05	33%	21 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	22%	21 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.03	16%	21 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	6%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.02	21%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	22%	20 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.03	32%	19 Aug →
cache	10–1	-0.03	13%	19 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.09	25%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.10	21%	19 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	14%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.05	27%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.08	21%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	21%	13 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	18%	13 Aug →
mirage	11–5	0.02	18%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.07	19%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.00	15%	13 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	21%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.01	22%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	8%	11 Aug →
cache	0–10	-0.07	0%	11 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	14%	9 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	21%	4 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	23%	4 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.00	30%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.06	28%	2 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	10%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	17%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	31%	2 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	28%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	31%	2 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.04	17%	2 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	31%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	31%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	20%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.01	32%	1 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.01	25%	1 Aug →
nuke	9–2	0.02	20%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	21%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.07	20%	1 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	25%	1 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	18%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	32%	30 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.03	24%	30 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.03	18%	26 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.04	18%	26 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	19%	26 Jul →
mirage	0–6	-0.10	0%	26 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	13%	26 Jul →
mirage	6–3	0.01	15%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.00	14%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.04	21%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.00	17%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.00	26%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–16	-0.05	13%	19 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	17%	18 Jul →
shelter	13–9	0.04	40%	18 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.08	23%	18 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.06	26%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.01	19%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	24%	17 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.05	19%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.03	14%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.08	36%	15 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.06	31%	15 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.04	21%	15 Jul →
fachwerk	13–11	0.06	24%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	14%	15 Jul →
dust2	16–19	-0.02	16%	2 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	26%	19 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.01	21%	19 Jun →
mirage	16–12	-0.02	30%	17 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	15%	16 Jun →