17

17 — CS2 Stats

FR76561198956266213[U:1:996000485]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,419Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,419 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 65 days played since 30 Dec 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

65Days played since 2023-12-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning67
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48511Last 10048%Win rateWWLWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −7.4pp headshot accuracy · −69ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility4.1
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.7
Utility4.1
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time589ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy27.6%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 27.7% → last ⅓ avg 27.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–0 · anubis, 8 Mar
57%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · anubis, 5 Jan
359msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · anubis, 1 Jan
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 8 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
811In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA25141156%0.01
mirageC1661038%0.01
dust2C125742%0.05
overpassA127558%-0.02
vertigoB115645%-0.00
ancientC104640%-0.00
nukeC94544%0.01
infernoA53260%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,951Matches
54%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
84.8ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis9955%1.2017.0
Dust27764%1.4317.3
Mirage5848%1.0816.1
Ancient4949%1.0717.4
Nuke4764%1.3318.4
Inferno3241%1.1715.6
Overpass2868%1.2017.6
Vertigo1850%1.0815.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.4%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
87.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
593msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
62.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
6.93HE damage / grenade
9.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.357% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.0224%9 Aug
dust213–70.0029%9 Aug
mirage10–130.0119%31 May
nuke13–80.0328%27 May
nuke13–10-0.0124%17 May
dust213–70.0421%15 May
ancient6–13-0.0527%12 May
dust29–130.0539%12 May
dust22–13-0.0013%8 May
mirage13–16-0.0218%4 May
anubis7–13-0.0423%3 May
mirage13–30.0830%27 Apr
dust211–130.0735%24 Apr
inferno13–40.2042%22 Apr
mirage13–30.1644%22 Apr
dust213–30.1735%9 Apr
mirage10–130.0633%6 Apr
mirage5–130.0133%22 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0617%19 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0922%14 Jul
dust212–120.0726%12 Jun
dust213–100.0325%14 Jan
dust213–100.1228%21 Dec
dust210–130.0120%30 Nov
dust29–13-0.0318%27 Nov
nuke19–15-0.0119%27 Nov
anubis10–130.0323%27 Nov
anubis13–70.1131%25 Oct
dust210–130.0228%23 Oct
inferno13–110.0334%8 Oct
anubis13–160.0038%20 Apr
anubis13–110.0237%10 Mar
vertigo12–160.0129%8 Mar
anubis13–00.2224%8 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0223%7 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0433%5 Mar
anubis14–16-0.0027%2 Mar
overpass13–60.0617%2 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0422%2 Mar
overpass17–19-0.0117%1 Mar
vertigo4–130.0116%1 Mar
nuke9–13-0.065%27 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0520%25 Feb
vertigo8–130.0128%24 Feb
ancient13–80.0028%24 Feb
nuke8–130.0426%24 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0026%15 Feb
vertigo13–90.0330%13 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0028%10 Feb
overpass20–22-0.0924%8 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0239%7 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0820%6 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0450%4 Feb
anubis16–140.0928%4 Feb
vertigo13–11-0.0126%3 Feb
anubis13–80.0323%1 Feb
anubis13–6-0.0313%30 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0428%27 Jan
vertigo13–8-0.0519%27 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0020%26 Jan
anubis13–80.0420%25 Jan
overpass13–100.0418%25 Jan
anubis13–110.0631%23 Jan
overpass11–13-0.0422%21 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0713%21 Jan
vertigo5–13-0.0929%21 Jan
anubis7–13-0.0514%19 Jan
nuke17–19-0.0019%16 Jan
overpass8–13-0.0513%16 Jan
inferno13–40.0917%16 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0035%15 Jan
ancient11–130.0126%15 Jan
mirage6–130.0028%14 Jan
inferno3–13-0.0518%14 Jan
overpass13–9-0.0426%13 Jan
mirage13–90.0225%13 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0423%11 Jan
anubis13–10-0.0419%10 Jan
overpass13–80.0417%10 Jan
mirage13–40.0133%10 Jan
vertigo9–130.0128%7 Jan
ancient20–220.0437%6 Jan
vertigo13–60.0327%6 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0520%5 Jan
anubis13–5-0.0057%5 Jan
nuke16–190.0529%4 Jan
vertigo11–130.0127%4 Jan
anubis7–130.0023%2 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0540%2 Jan
nuke13–70.1032%2 Jan
mirage8–130.0431%2 Jan
anubis13–70.1232%1 Jan
vertigo13–30.0119%1 Jan
overpass13–70.0122%1 Jan
anubis13–90.0318%1 Jan
anubis10–130.0429%31 Dec
ancient13–60.0733%31 Dec
ancient22–200.0232%30 Dec
mirage13–70.0044%30 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0435%30 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →