11

11 — CS2 Stats

76561198952487467[U:1:992221739]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

383Tracked matches64%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating16,712Purple band · top ~21.6% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Aug 2026 (37 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 27 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,712 +3,193 19 May13 Aug · 14 days played
13,51916,712peak 16,71219 May13 Aug
16,712Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-02-27

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 16,712
  • +1,848 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,193 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,288 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG11PREMIER16,712 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning62
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50455Last 10050%Win rateWWLWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.8
Utility5.5
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact9.8

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time586ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 30 Jul
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–7 · inferno, 25 May
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 10 Jun
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 28 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24121250%0.03
mirageC2071335%0.01
ancientA169756%0.03
infernoB147750%0.00
nukeS128467%0.01
anubisD61517%-0.03
overpassA53260%-0.02
cache220100%0.04
train110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

28Matches
46%Win rate
1.41Avg K/D
96.3ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1050%1.3318.7
Nuke450%1.9219.8
Inferno450%1.1716.5
Ancient367%1.8923.7
Dust2333%1.2914.0
Anubis20%0.7012.5
Train10%1.0017.0
Overpass1100%1.8936.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.9%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
569msReaction time
39.8%T opening success
55.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
9.50HE damage / grenade
7.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.7516% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–00.0322%13 Aug
inferno13–40.0120%13 Aug
dust22–130.0323%13 Aug
ancient13–80.1415%30 Jul
dust23–10-0.027%16 Jul
mirage13–7-0.005%15 Jul
ancient13–30.0314%15 Jul
inferno13–80.0326%15 Jul
ancient13–10.0318%10 Jul
mirage13–90.0322%10 Jul
dust212–160.0620%9 Jul
dust21–13-0.0638%16 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0521%13 Jun
mirage7–130.1116%11 Jun
mirage13–20.1121%11 Jun
dust28–130.1014%11 Jun
nuke12–120.0614%10 Jun
dust210–13-0.0126%10 Jun
ancient13–80.0610%10 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0117%10 Jun
ancient12–160.0817%9 Jun
dust213–80.0123%9 Jun
mirage13–60.0821%9 Jun
mirage7–130.0021%9 Jun
nuke13–50.0318%7 Jun
inferno15–150.0113%7 Jun
ancient13–60.1025%7 Jun
inferno13–90.0917%7 Jun
inferno13–40.0726%7 Jun
dust213–60.0921%7 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0219%7 Jun
nuke13–2-0.128%1 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0619%1 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0013%1 Jun
dust213–110.0319%1 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0413%1 Jun
dust25–130.0412%1 Jun
ancient12–120.0225%31 May
nuke13–70.0513%31 May
cache13–70.0622%31 May
mirage12–120.0115%31 May
dust213–5-0.0432%31 May
inferno11–130.0626%31 May
nuke0–13-0.0629%31 May
overpass10–13-0.0419%31 May
cache13–70.0328%31 May
mirage3–13-0.0716%31 May
mirage5–130.0127%26 May
dust29–130.0032%26 May
dust213–50.0324%26 May
inferno13–30.0315%26 May
dust213–50.1222%26 May
inferno1–7-0.03100%25 May
inferno13–8-0.0512%25 May
nuke10–13-0.0013%24 May
dust23–130.0126%24 May
mirage6–13-0.0014%24 May
overpass13–4-0.0121%24 May
mirage7–130.0120%23 May
dust213–90.0612%23 May
nuke7–130.0319%23 May
dust24–13-0.0120%23 May
ancient4–130.0225%23 May
inferno11–13-0.0418%23 May
anubis16–14-0.0220%21 May
overpass13–9-0.0411%21 May
dust215–15-0.0223%21 May
nuke16–140.0422%21 May
ancient13–80.0521%21 May
mirage7–13-0.0213%21 May
mirage13–80.0118%21 May
ancient11–13-0.0227%21 May
mirage13–70.1019%20 May
dust213–30.1026%20 May
mirage6–130.0324%20 May
ancient9–130.0131%20 May
inferno13–5-0.1112%19 May
ancient13–8-0.0928%19 May
anubis2–13-0.0825%19 May
inferno4–13-0.0919%19 May
ancient6–13-0.0520%19 May
ancient13–90.0317%19 May
dust213–90.0821%19 May
dust213–7-0.0316%19 May
mirage11–13-0.1017%8 Apr
inferno9–130.0411%8 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0517%8 Apr
dust213–70.0032%8 Apr
nuke13–90.0321%8 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0019%7 Apr
ancient10–130.0116%7 Apr
dust28–13-0.0025%7 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0231%7 Mar
nuke13–00.0624%28 Feb
mirage13–80.0117%28 Feb
inferno9–130.0520%28 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0818%28 Feb
dust213–80.0425%28 Feb
overpass3–50.0211%28 Feb
train13–70.0418%27 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →