Контракт СВО 365д

Контракт СВО 365д — CS2 Stats

KZ76561198947163478[U:1:986897750]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

882Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,292Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#59016 of 227281 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 882 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 71 days played since 21 Jul 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,292 -1,304 2 Aug14 Sept · 22 days played
18,99925,102peak 25,1022 Aug14 Sept
25,102Peak Premier in tracked matches
71Days played since 2025-07-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,810 below peak (25,102)
  • 0 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,708 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGКонтракт СВО 365дFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,292 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning60
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51418Last 10051%Win rateWWTWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.08 avg rating · +7.5pp headshot accuracy · +169ms reaction

Win rate up 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 401 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 680ms

Last 10

  • 811 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 708ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.3
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.0
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time652ms+52ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 2 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–9 · dust2, 2 Oct
453msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 21 May
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 22 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
114In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 65% over 17infernoWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2481633%0.02
dust2A1811761%0.03
ancientS1711665%0.03
anubisA106460%0.03
infernoD102820%0.03
nukeB63350%-0.01
train42250%0.04
overpass330100%0.07
cache32167%0.05
vertigo1010%-0.04
golden110100%-0.02
palacio110100%0.11
grail1010%0.06
agency110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

722Matches
53%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
71.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14350%1.0914.6
Anubis6255%1.2015.7
Dust24558%1.0714.6
Ancient3858%1.0715.3
Vertigo3749%1.2316.7
Nuke1937%1.0316.5
Inferno1010%1.0615.0
Overpass862%1.5719.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
88.5%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
655msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
51.2%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
8.39HE damage / grenade
6.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4995 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5992% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–70.0831%8 Jun
overpass13–60.1422%8 Jun
vertigo12–12-0.0414%7 Jun
cache13–110.0215%6 Jun
dust213–40.0931%5 Jun
mirage13–60.0517%5 Jun
dust213–30.1450%5 Jun
dust210–130.0314%5 Jun
mirage13–20.0720%4 Jun
anubis13–50.0532%3 Jun
dust21–4-0.120%3 Jun
mirage10–130.0224%2 Jun
mirage8–130.0018%28 May
ancient13–11-0.0426%27 May
mirage9–130.048%26 May
nuke4–13-0.0710%24 May
anubis11–13-0.0324%24 May
inferno12–120.0912%24 May
ancient13–50.0125%21 May
dust210–13-0.0325%18 May
mirage13–90.0817%18 May
mirage9–13-0.0218%18 May
dust213–60.0023%15 May
inferno7–130.0011%11 May
nuke5–13-0.0721%11 May
mirage1–60.0533%10 May
ancient13–40.1421%9 May
dust23–13-0.019%9 May
inferno12–120.0127%5 May
dust27–13-0.0432%4 May
cache6–130.0823%30 Apr
cache13–80.0526%29 Apr
ancient8–130.0122%27 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0319%27 Apr
dust213–100.1014%26 Apr
mirage15–150.0917%26 Apr
nuke13–10.0423%22 Apr
nuke14–160.0115%9 Mar
inferno13–20.0332%7 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0114%7 Mar
mirage13–90.1035%15 Dec
anubis13–80.0321%12 Dec
anubis12–12-0.0113%10 Dec
inferno12–120.0322%6 Dec
inferno1–5-0.0423%5 Dec
train13–110.0631%5 Dec
ancient13–110.0213%28 Nov
train13–20.0732%28 Nov
mirage13–8-0.0223%20 Nov
mirage6–130.0132%16 Nov
mirage8–13-0.0027%14 Nov
mirage13–80.0629%12 Nov
mirage13–110.0413%12 Nov
dust213–110.0513%9 Nov
mirage9–130.0315%1 Nov
train1–13-0.0231%31 Oct
anubis8–13-0.0529%16 Oct
mirage0–5-0.0633%16 Oct
ancient13–10-0.0112%16 Oct
golden13–11-0.0212%5 Oct
inferno1–110.0243%5 Oct
palacio13–10.1124%5 Oct
dust21–9-0.01100%2 Oct
mirage10–130.0127%1 Oct
inferno8–130.0324%30 Sept
mirage5–60.0822%29 Sept
ancient13–30.1125%28 Sept
ancient13–60.0221%25 Sept
ancient1–2-0.040%23 Sept
mirage6–120.0815%22 Sept
anubis13–80.058%19 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0420%15 Sept
anubis13–40.1026%13 Sept
ancient12–120.0920%12 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0233%11 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0125%10 Sept
ancient13–70.0424%8 Sept
dust213–80.0520%7 Sept
grail12–120.0622%6 Sept
agency13–110.0319%6 Sept
ancient9–13-0.069%6 Sept
inferno13–90.0727%5 Sept
ancient13–60.0625%5 Sept
dust213–70.0621%3 Sept
mirage3–10-0.050%2 Sept
nuke13–40.0427%2 Sept
dust213–80.0227%1 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0633%18 Aug
dust213–90.0517%11 Aug
dust213–110.0921%9 Aug
ancient13–70.0325%5 Aug
train3–130.0510%5 Aug
inferno4–130.0118%4 Aug
dust213–40.0532%4 Aug
ancient13–20.1726%2 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0317%2 Aug
overpass13–70.0513%2 Aug
overpass13–110.0213%31 Jul
dust210–130.0018%30 Jul
anubis13–20.0926%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →