★ ⋆ Nito ⋆ ★

★ ⋆ Nito ⋆ ★ — CS2 Stats

76561198938456419[U:1:978190691]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,917Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating24,387Top 25% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#27438 of 247913 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,387 +120 3 Sept – 1 Oct · 14 days played
22,56925,000peak 25,0003 Sept1 Oct
25,000Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 613 below peak (25,000)
  • +120 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 613 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG★ ⋆ Nito ⋆ ★FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,387 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning61
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT44–46–10Last 10044%Win rateWWWLLWTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.3
Utility5.9
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch5.4

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 71% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 71% on T to 35% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.1
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact6.3

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time502ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 508ms → last ⅓ avg 502ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 12–12 · mirage, 8 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 8–1 · mirage, 10 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · nuke, 1 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 1 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 50% over 10ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC4620–2643%0.02
infernoB136–746%0.03
nukeB105–550%0.03
ancientD103–730%-0.02
dust2B105–550%0.03
anubisB63–350%0.02
cache—41–325%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

69Matches
64%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
90.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2167%1.4519.7
Anubis1267%1.1316.2
Inferno1060%1.4618.5
Vertigo1070%1.5521.2
Ancient850%1.2618.0
Dust2425%1.0817.8
Overpass3100%1.2522.0
Nuke1100%1.0021.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
488msReaction time
70.7%T opening success
35.3%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
11.94HE damage / grenade
6.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.3172% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–11-0.0313%1 Oct →
nuke13–00.0321%1 Oct →
mirage13–70.0822%1 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0021%1 Oct →
mirage6–130.0218%1 Oct →
inferno13–40.0513%30 Sept →
inferno12–120.0012%30 Sept →
mirage7–10.1114%29 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0025%29 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0512%29 Sept →
nuke13–60.0224%29 Sept →
ancient13–30.0210%28 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0725%28 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.034%27 Sept →
mirage12–120.0215%27 Sept →
nuke11–130.0720%25 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.029%25 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0219%24 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0319%24 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0616%23 Sept →
anubis13–80.1115%23 Sept →
inferno12–120.1311%23 Sept →
mirage8–130.0318%23 Sept →
dust213–50.1313%22 Sept →
inferno13–70.1316%22 Sept →
mirage13–100.0313%21 Sept →
mirage7–130.0916%21 Sept →
nuke8–80.0414%21 Sept →
ancient11–130.0514%21 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0914%21 Sept →
inferno10–130.0424%21 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0119%21 Sept →
inferno13–60.0015%18 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0014%18 Sept →
ancient3–6-0.090%18 Sept →
cache7–130.0413%18 Sept →
nuke13–70.1120%18 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.007%18 Sept →
anubis13–20.0813%17 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0713%17 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0018%17 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0120%17 Sept →
anubis5–130.028%16 Sept →
dust211–130.0016%16 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0415%16 Sept →
dust213–20.064%16 Sept →
nuke13–10.0917%16 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.029%16 Sept →
mirage10–130.0818%16 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0615%16 Sept →
ancient13–70.0119%14 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0613%14 Sept →
ancient11–130.0412%14 Sept →
dust213–10.067%14 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0111%14 Sept →
dust213–40.0617%14 Sept →
dust26–130.0111%13 Sept →
mirage11–130.0114%13 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0115%13 Sept →
mirage0–6-0.1013%13 Sept →
mirage12–120.039%13 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.035%13 Sept →
mirage12–120.0238%13 Sept →
mirage6–130.0116%13 Sept →
mirage13–10.0618%13 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0314%13 Sept →
dust213–80.0314%13 Sept →
mirage13–30.1013%12 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0128%12 Sept →
mirage11–130.0217%12 Sept →
mirage13–80.0912%12 Sept →
mirage13–40.1219%12 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0414%12 Sept →
inferno13–60.0919%12 Sept →
dust210–130.0231%11 Sept →
mirage7–130.0420%11 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0119%11 Sept →
inferno13–60.1629%11 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0525%11 Sept →
dust24–130.0524%11 Sept →
mirage1–70.0123%11 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.056%10 Sept →
nuke2–9-0.0329%10 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0910%10 Sept →
mirage13–50.0523%10 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0311%10 Sept →
mirage8–10.1043%10 Sept →
mirage2–2-0.070%10 Sept →
mirage2–90.0131%8 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.016%8 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0214%8 Sept →
mirage12–120.1612%8 Sept →
mirage13–90.0222%8 Sept →
mirage13–110.0313%8 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0324%8 Sept →
mirage13–50.0113%8 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0123%8 Sept →
mirage13–10.1621%8 Sept →
mirage6–130.0623%7 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0720%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.