Lelo25

Lelo25 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198934174934[U:1:973909206]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,226Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,230 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

16,670Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,230Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
79Days played since 2025-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,230
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 270 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLelo25FACEITLevel 9 · 2,230 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,230csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning57
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateLLWLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −111ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility6.7
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.7
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time605ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–9 · overpass, 22 Oct →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 19 Jul →
422msFastest reaction time · 4–9 · vertigo, 6 Oct →
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 18 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 76% over 17infernoWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB3217–1553%0.00
nukeS1713–476%0.02
infernoC167–944%-0.01
anubisA127–558%0.00
cacheA85–363%-0.01
overpass—43–175%0.01
train—41–325%-0.03
dust2—32–167%0.00
vertigo—20–20%0.01
poseidon—10–10%-0.03
agency—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,802Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
74.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient47050%1.0515.1
Nuke34454%1.0614.4
Anubis29746%0.9913.9
Inferno27350%0.9813.6
Mirage11145%0.8713.4
Vertigo10658%1.1215.1
Train9059%1.0614.7
Overpass7643%1.0115.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
589msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
50.1%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
8.27HE damage / grenade
15.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5369% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
poseidon3–9-0.0325%6 Oct →
vertigo4–9-0.0519%6 Oct →
ancient13–100.0123%28 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0212%25 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0420%25 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0112%24 Aug →
nuke16–120.0618%20 Aug →
cache16–13-0.0016%19 Aug →
nuke13–30.0920%18 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0621%21 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0811%20 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0420%20 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0121%19 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0147%19 Jul →
anubis13–100.0317%10 Jul →
ancient16–120.0222%9 Jul →
inferno13–50.0515%2 Jul →
ancient8–130.0323%29 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0415%27 Jun →
ancient9–130.0118%26 Jun →
anubis13–80.0412%25 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.049%23 Jun →
nuke13–30.0610%8 Jun →
ancient13–30.0916%5 Jun →
inferno13–110.0619%3 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0511%31 May →
ancient13–9-0.0126%26 May →
inferno16–12-0.0016%25 May →
cache9–13-0.056%19 May →
inferno13–100.0614%17 May →
inferno7–13-0.0415%12 May →
ancient16–140.0012%10 May →
nuke13–8-0.0020%7 May →
cache13–5-0.0121%6 May →
cache7–130.0610%2 May →
cache8–13-0.0129%2 May →
cache13–90.0417%29 Apr →
cache13–40.0014%29 Apr →
inferno13–80.0214%27 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0511%16 Apr →
ancient13–5-0.0616%7 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0422%30 Mar →
inferno13–110.0226%29 Mar →
anubis10–130.0214%25 Mar →
nuke4–130.000%25 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0318%24 Mar →
inferno3–13-0.0733%22 Mar →
inferno2–13-0.057%14 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0017%11 Mar →
dust213–90.0125%9 Mar →
ancient13–80.0516%4 Mar →
nuke13–90.0123%1 Mar →
overpass13–70.0425%18 Feb →
anubis13–90.0219%8 Feb →
ancient16–130.0118%5 Feb →
ancient6–130.0622%5 Feb →
ancient14–160.0119%2 Feb →
anubis13–90.009%2 Feb →
anubis13–40.0621%27 Jan →
inferno4–13-0.0919%25 Jan →
nuke13–40.0521%15 Dec →
ancient7–130.0415%11 Dec →
ancient9–13-0.0621%11 Dec →
overpass4–13-0.1114%8 Dec →
train11–13-0.0910%4 Dec →
anubis13–80.0112%2 Dec →
inferno13–100.0019%29 Nov →
nuke16–14-0.0122%28 Nov →
ancient13–30.0117%28 Nov →
ancient5–130.0314%28 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.0712%27 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0513%27 Nov →
nuke15–150.0618%25 Nov →
dust214–160.0011%25 Nov →
train9–13-0.0417%18 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0123%10 Nov →
vertigo4–130.0629%31 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0218%31 Oct →
ancient13–90.0217%30 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0019%26 Oct →
agency11–13-0.0317%24 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0311%24 Oct →
overpass13–90.1025%22 Oct →
ancient13–70.0820%21 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0313%21 Oct →
ancient13–30.0525%20 Oct →
nuke13–40.0817%20 Oct →
train13–10-0.0124%20 Oct →
ancient13–160.0214%19 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0516%14 Oct →
ancient16–130.0121%7 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.049%7 Oct →
overpass16–14-0.0112%6 Oct →
inferno8–130.048%27 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0121%27 Sept →
train8–130.0220%26 Sept →
nuke13–70.0619%24 Sept →
inferno20–22-0.0617%18 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0410%17 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0112%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.