ProGriefer9000

ProGriefer9000 — CS2 Stats

76561198928916931[U:1:968651203]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

229Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.0 LearningPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 229 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 22 Feb 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,596 -1,962 3 Jan5 Jul · 7 days played
7,47011,338peak 11,3383 Jan5 Jul
11,338Peak Premier in tracked matches
51Days played since 2025-02-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim32
Positioning37
Utility10

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40546Last 10040%Win rateLWWTWWLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 731ms

Last 10

  • 532 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 662ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim3.2
Utility1.0
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 647ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2
Positioning3.7
Utility1.0
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 3.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time648ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 692ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms
Headshot accuracy12.9%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 9.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 22 Jul
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · overpass, 5 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · inferno, 12 Aug
13–0Biggest win · cache, 18 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
42In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 53% over 19overpassWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2451921%-0.05
infernoB1910953%-0.02
ancientB178947%-0.04
nukeB126650%-0.01
overpassD102820%-0.06
cacheC83538%-0.01
train43175%-0.05
dust231233%-0.04
anubis21150%-0.03
vertigo110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.3%Headshot accuracy
29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.9%Spray accuracy
69.0%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
647msReaction time
15.2%T opening success
27.3%CT opening success
0.11Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
9.95HE damage / grenade
0.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2663% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1096 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.2472% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0519%17 Sept
inferno16–12-0.0615%26 Aug
cache13–6-0.032%26 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0512%22 Aug
ancient13–3-0.048%22 Aug
inferno13–40.1012%12 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0126%22 Jul
cache13–10.1111%22 Jul
cache3–13-0.0913%22 Jul
cache12–12-0.0218%8 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0010%5 Jul
overpass13–1-0.0245%5 Jul
inferno3–13-0.139%2 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0212%2 Jul
mirage1–13-0.088%2 Jul
overpass5–13-0.0814%2 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0611%1 Jul
nuke16–12-0.026%1 Jul
ancient13–6-0.088%1 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0613%1 Jul
mirage0–50.0113%30 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0213%30 Jun
inferno13–80.0218%30 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0515%29 Jun
nuke9–10.045%29 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0313%28 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0418%28 Jun
nuke13–6-0.066%28 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0310%26 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0413%26 Jun
inferno6–13-0.056%26 Jun
nuke7–130.0211%26 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0411%25 Jun
ancient8–13-0.105%25 Jun
overpass1–13-0.067%24 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0210%24 Jun
mirage4–13-0.079%24 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0212%24 Jun
ancient13–10-0.058%24 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0219%23 Jun
inferno13–60.0018%23 Jun
ancient12–16-0.0012%1 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0811%1 Jun
cache13–00.0027%18 May
cache10–13-0.0414%13 May
mirage6–13-0.0612%13 May
mirage13–60.0613%13 May
inferno16–14-0.029%13 May
cache12–12-0.029%13 May
overpass5–13-0.0718%2 May
cache7–130.001%2 May
ancient12–16-0.0412%24 Apr
ancient8–13-0.069%3 Mar
anubis13–10.007%3 Mar
mirage7–13-0.043%3 Mar
inferno13–50.037%10 Jan
ancient13–50.0114%10 Jan
ancient9–13-0.130%9 Jan
overpass13–6-0.0315%3 Jan
mirage5–13-0.122%3 Jan
inferno4–13-0.039%3 Jan
overpass6–13-0.0813%15 Dec
ancient2–13-0.0711%15 Dec
train13–4-0.044%15 Dec
mirage13–4-0.0511%15 Dec
nuke13–10-0.014%1 Nov
inferno9–13-0.058%1 Nov
ancient13–11-0.019%31 Oct
inferno12–16-0.0116%30 Oct
inferno10–13-0.0415%29 Oct
mirage13–9-0.046%29 Oct
train13–10-0.015%28 Oct
inferno13–5-0.0214%27 Oct
ancient15–15-0.058%27 Oct
dust27–13-0.0310%26 Oct
mirage12–16-0.0515%25 Oct
overpass6–13-0.067%25 Oct
overpass6–13-0.0418%14 Oct
mirage2–13-0.0714%14 Oct
train16–14-0.089%12 Oct
ancient13–90.0219%1 Oct
dust26–13-0.047%25 Jul
train12–12-0.0610%14 Jul
vertigo13–10-0.018%14 Jul
mirage13–4-0.069%14 Jul
nuke13–20.0526%1 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0110%1 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0812%29 Jun
nuke7–13-0.010%27 Jun
ancient13–70.0412%27 Jun
mirage4–13-0.057%27 Jun
mirage13–16-0.058%26 Jun
overpass12–12-0.077%16 Jun
nuke13–30.005%10 Jun
mirage8–13-0.090%12 Apr
nuke9–13-0.070%3 Apr
inferno13–8-0.075%25 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0913%23 Mar
anubis7–13-0.079%25 Feb
dust213–10-0.067%22 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →