Atom

Atom — CS2 Stats

SC76561198913462327[U:1:953196599]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,039Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,044 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,044 → 1,044
+13Tracked matches · now 2,039
+6.7ppWin rate · 36.7% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 15 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,461 +341 15 Apr30 Jun · 23 days played
11,53414,999peak 14,99915 Apr30 Jun
15,121Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,044Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-04-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,044
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 7 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAtomFACEITLevel 4 · 1,044 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,044csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning47
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43552Last 10043%Win rateWWWLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +11.0pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 658ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility4.8
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch2.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.7
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time653ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 653ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 3 May
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 12 Sept
469msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 30 Jun
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 12 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
139In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 50% over 12ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B47232449%-0.02
infernoC2281436%-0.02
mirageB126650%0.00
ancientD72529%-0.01
anubisD72529%-0.04
nuke3030%-0.06
overpass220100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

336Matches
47%Win rate
0.80Avg K/D
74.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210549%0.8814.4
Mirage7246%0.7715.0
Inferno5443%0.7813.6
Ancient4743%0.6911.7
Nuke1060%0.7815.1
Overpass1080%1.0518.9
Anubis729%1.0817.3
Train683%0.7712.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
653msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
47.5%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
7.24HE damage / grenade
7.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.4867% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage19–160.0526%12 Sept
mirage13–20.0238%12 Sept
dust225–23-0.0333%12 Sept
dust27–13-0.0223%14 Aug
dust28–13-0.0126%14 Aug
dust211–13-0.0117%8 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0224%2 Aug
dust213–110.0133%2 Aug
dust27–130.0125%2 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0125%2 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0432%29 Jul
dust213–16-0.0316%29 Jul
dust20–3-0.020%21 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0911%21 Jul
dust213–11-0.0613%20 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0913%20 Jul
dust22–13-0.0612%30 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0325%30 Jun
dust213–2-0.0321%30 Jun
dust213–11-0.0319%30 Jun
dust25–13-0.0713%30 Jun
dust29–130.0316%28 Jun
dust28–13-0.0212%28 Jun
ancient13–90.0333%27 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0020%27 Jun
dust210–13-0.0412%1 Jun
inferno13–100.0219%1 Jun
dust216–140.0018%1 Jun
dust213–11-0.0126%1 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0711%1 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0313%1 Jun
dust216–140.0128%15 May
inferno11–130.0324%15 May
ancient3–13-0.0411%14 May
inferno1–13-0.0929%14 May
dust211–13-0.0811%14 May
anubis9–13-0.0316%14 May
nuke11–13-0.0823%13 May
dust210–13-0.0338%13 May
anubis13–9-0.0610%13 May
mirage8–130.0032%13 May
ancient4–13-0.0212%13 May
dust213–3-0.0220%13 May
inferno8–13-0.0419%13 May
nuke7–13-0.0338%13 May
dust213–10-0.0919%13 May
inferno13–7-0.0620%12 May
dust213–9-0.0217%12 May
overpass13–11-0.0322%9 May
inferno8–13-0.0223%9 May
dust210–13-0.0314%9 May
dust213–6-0.0414%9 May
dust211–130.0321%8 May
dust216–13-0.0014%8 May
inferno13–30.0529%7 May
nuke11–13-0.0820%7 May
anubis7–13-0.0319%7 May
mirage13–8-0.0323%7 May
dust22–13-0.0430%7 May
anubis4–13-0.0515%7 May
dust213–110.0417%7 May
mirage5–130.0020%4 May
dust23–13-0.089%4 May
dust210–13-0.0114%4 May
mirage13–90.0723%4 May
dust213–10-0.0421%4 May
dust213–8-0.0520%3 May
mirage13–70.1421%3 May
inferno5–13-0.0835%3 May
ancient13–50.0916%3 May
dust29–130.0018%3 May
dust216–130.0830%3 May
dust216–14-0.0121%3 May
mirage9–13-0.0215%3 May
inferno16–140.0431%3 May
overpass13–110.1115%2 May
anubis5–13-0.118%30 Apr
inferno13–60.0129%30 Apr
dust213–8-0.0417%30 Apr
dust213–70.0917%29 Apr
dust213–80.0238%29 Apr
dust213–80.0029%29 Apr
dust215–15-0.0313%24 Apr
inferno12–160.0011%24 Apr
dust213–40.0520%24 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0421%23 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0313%22 Apr
dust28–13-0.1026%22 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0610%22 Apr
dust211–13-0.0628%22 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0727%22 Apr
dust215–150.0431%22 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0428%22 Apr
inferno11–130.008%20 Apr
anubis13–90.0818%20 Apr
inferno8–130.0121%19 Apr
ancient12–160.0023%16 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0510%16 Apr
inferno13–100.0218%16 Apr
dust24–13-0.0033%15 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →