brn$ — CS2 Stats

76561198894917996[U:1:934652268]✓ No bans

1,048Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,877 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95

Positioning60

Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–58–1Last 10041%Win rateWWLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.5

Aggression8.0

Utility7.5

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels3.7

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.87 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5

Positioning6.0

Utility7.5

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels3.7

Win Impact3.9

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time488ms+14ms

first ⅓ avg 474ms → last ⅓ avg 488ms

Headshot accuracy23.5%+1.0%

first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 5–13

13–2Biggest win — ancient

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 46% over 13mirageWeakest map · 36% over 25

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	C	26	11–15	42%	0.00
mirage	C	25	9–16	36%	0.01
dust2	C	21	9–12	43%	0.02
ancient	B	13	6–7	46%	0.00
overpass	C	9	4–5	44%	0.01
anubis	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02
train	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,329Matches

58%Win rate

1.36Avg K/D

83.8ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

21Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	389	55%	1.36	18.0
Dust2	148	53%	1.37	17.0
Ancient	120	52%	1.33	15.8
Anubis	105	60%	1.34	17.5
Nuke	58	66%	1.36	17.5
Train	22	73%	1.45	20.2
Overpass	19	63%	1.46	16.9
Inferno	11	64%	1.02	12.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy

42.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

47.4%Spray accuracy

80.9%Counter-strafing

7.8°Preaim

482msReaction time

35.0%T opening success

54.9%CT opening success

0.87Enemies flashed / flash

16.6%Flash assists

7.80HE damage / grenade

15.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.9999% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–5	0.04	39%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	7%	26 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	20%	25 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	21%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	56%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.05	19%	17 Aug →
mirage	16–19	0.06	24%	14 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.06	12%	22 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.13	48%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.04	38%	8 Jun →
nuke	16–13	0.07	23%	20 May →
anubis	13–9	0.06	15%	20 May →
overpass	9–13	-0.02	38%	20 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	35%	20 May →
mirage	13–6	0.06	24%	20 May →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	22%	17 May →
ancient	11–13	0.00	26%	17 May →
nuke	13–5	0.04	18%	15 May →
mirage	13–3	0.02	28%	15 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	7%	2 May →
anubis	8–13	0.01	14%	2 May →
nuke	13–8	0.01	18%	29 Apr →
overpass	11–13	0.04	15%	29 Apr →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	16%	29 Apr →
overpass	13–7	0.08	20%	28 Apr →
ancient	13–7	0.06	20%	28 Apr →
overpass	5–13	-0.09	10%	27 Apr →
nuke	6–13	0.01	28%	27 Apr →
nuke	13–10	0.12	22%	27 Apr →
mirage	1–13	-0.04	14%	27 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.01	15%	27 Apr →
nuke	1–13	-0.03	41%	24 Apr →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	19%	24 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	25%	22 Apr →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	14%	20 Apr →
dust2	11–13	0.02	29%	20 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.06	18%	18 Apr →
overpass	13–3	0.03	20%	18 Apr →
anubis	16–12	0.00	17%	17 Apr →
dust2	16–13	0.05	18%	17 Apr →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	22%	8 Apr →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	30%	8 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.01	36%	7 Apr →
nuke	13–5	-0.03	8%	7 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.00	19%	2 Apr →
mirage	0–0	0.00	0%	2 Apr →
ancient	13–2	0.06	9%	2 Apr →
nuke	2–13	-0.04	13%	1 Apr →
dust2	9–13	0.01	18%	1 Apr →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	20%	31 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	40%	31 Mar →
nuke	13–11	0.06	21%	31 Mar →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	17%	31 Mar →
dust2	11–13	0.00	50%	31 Mar →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	32%	29 Mar →
mirage	16–14	0.02	38%	29 Mar →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	22%	26 Mar →
nuke	13–2	0.05	35%	26 Mar →
mirage	19–16	0.02	31%	26 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.11	23%	26 Mar →
nuke	13–4	0.11	27%	26 Mar →
mirage	11–13	0.08	14%	23 Mar →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	23%	23 Mar →
dust2	13–11	0.03	18%	21 Mar →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	0%	20 Mar →
ancient	8–13	0.05	15%	20 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	28%	20 Mar →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	27%	19 Mar →
mirage	13–11	0.04	13%	19 Mar →
overpass	13–6	0.05	33%	19 Mar →
nuke	13–7	0.02	8%	18 Mar →
mirage	13–11	0.11	24%	18 Mar →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	33%	17 Mar →
ancient	13–7	0.05	15%	15 Mar →
nuke	13–9	0.04	38%	15 Mar →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	31%	14 Mar →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	7%	14 Mar →
overpass	13–9	-0.01	31%	14 Mar →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	25%	5 Mar →
overpass	3–13	0.02	13%	5 Mar →
nuke	1–13	-0.05	0%	5 Mar →
overpass	5–13	-0.04	24%	5 Mar →
mirage	13–10	0.11	26%	4 Feb →
dust2	11–13	0.08	20%	29 Jan →
ancient	1–13	-0.03	41%	18 Dec →
train	14–16	-0.03	14%	18 Dec →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	17%	16 Dec →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	25%	7 Nov →
mirage	1–13	-0.10	24%	7 Nov →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	21%	7 Nov →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	13%	7 Nov →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	33%	6 Nov →
dust2	6–13	-0.08	13%	6 Nov →
mirage	10–13	0.01	20%	6 Nov →
train	8–13	0.01	27%	5 Nov →
nuke	9–13	0.00	9%	5 Nov →
ancient	13–5	0.03	29%	3 Nov →
inferno	3–13	-0.01	29%	28 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	26%	28 Oct →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	31%	27 Oct →