Apsipis3s

Apsipis3s — CS2 Stats

EC76561198891449005[U:1:931183277]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,264Tracked matches37%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating22,193Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#54642 of 261604 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,593 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,193 +2,668 3 Sept – 10 Nov · 21 days played
19,52523,662peak 23,6623 Sept10 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,593 +0 3 Sept – 23 Sept · 3 observations
1,5931,593peak 1,5933 Sept23 Sept
23,733Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,593Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-09-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,593
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 158 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,469 below peak (23,662)
  • +229 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,807 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGApsipis3sFACEITLevel 8 · 1,593 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,193 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,593csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning42
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–52–5Last 10043%Win rateLWWLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +4.2pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.9
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.2
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time546ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy28.6%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 26.0% → last ⅓ avg 28.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 14 Oct →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 9–5 · inferno, 2 Nov →
313msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · inferno, 26 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · inferno, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 16ancientWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB5325–2847%0.01
dust2B168–850%-0.02
nukeD124–833%-0.01
mirageB84–450%-0.01
ancientD71–614%-0.03
cache—31–233%-0.03
anubis—10–10%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

710Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
78.6ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25956%1.0315.1
Dust217549%0.9414.7
Ancient10453%1.2016.1
Inferno8048%0.9815.7
Anubis3653%0.8812.1
Nuke3037%1.0616.8
Overpass933%1.1414.6
Vertigo838%1.0515.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.5%Headshot accuracy
29.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.8%Spray accuracy
73.0%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
547msReaction time
47.3%T opening success
38.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
11.68HE damage / grenade
9.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.2375% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–90.0352%14 Nov →
inferno13–80.0339%14 Nov →
inferno13–100.0029%14 Nov →
nuke7–9-0.1032%10 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0521%10 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0745%9 Nov →
inferno9–40.0819%7 Nov →
nuke9–130.0622%6 Nov →
inferno9–30.1440%5 Nov →
cache13–4-0.0328%5 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0734%5 Nov →
nuke13–70.0133%5 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0116%4 Nov →
mirage13–80.0323%3 Nov →
ancient13–160.0225%2 Nov →
inferno9–50.0852%2 Nov →
inferno14–16-0.0221%1 Nov →
inferno16–140.0025%30 Oct →
inferno9–60.1134%30 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0319%30 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0228%28 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0841%26 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0432%25 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0425%25 Oct →
inferno5–60.1035%24 Oct →
dust23–13-0.109%22 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0325%22 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0016%22 Oct →
dust213–60.0218%18 Oct →
inferno9–70.0022%18 Oct →
nuke13–110.0532%18 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0324%18 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0524%16 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0038%16 Oct →
mirage13–60.0028%16 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0614%16 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0332%15 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0728%15 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0817%15 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.1125%14 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0228%14 Oct →
inferno9–00.2617%14 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0133%13 Oct →
dust213–4-0.029%12 Oct →
anubis6–130.0035%12 Oct →
mirage16–12-0.0120%12 Oct →
inferno9–4-0.0327%12 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0439%11 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0337%10 Oct →
dust213–110.0828%10 Oct →
mirage13–100.0133%10 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.1733%9 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0541%9 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0216%7 Oct →
inferno5–90.0221%7 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0015%4 Oct →
inferno13–60.0033%4 Oct →
inferno9–40.0746%2 Oct →
inferno9–60.0817%2 Oct →
inferno9–20.1635%2 Oct →
nuke13–80.0530%1 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0140%29 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0621%27 Sept →
inferno6–130.0222%27 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0426%27 Sept →
dust213–60.0332%27 Sept →
inferno8–80.0327%27 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0415%27 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.0429%26 Sept →
inferno9–40.0937%26 Sept →
inferno6–90.0719%26 Sept →
inferno9–50.1320%26 Sept →
inferno9–30.1437%26 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1126%26 Sept →
inferno9–40.0836%26 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.1626%26 Sept →
inferno7–90.0126%26 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0329%26 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0828%25 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0127%25 Sept →
nuke11–130.0121%25 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0328%24 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0332%24 Sept →
inferno9–5-0.0710%24 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0227%24 Sept →
dust213–11-0.069%23 Sept →
inferno8–80.0426%23 Sept →
inferno9–30.0218%23 Sept →
inferno9–3-0.0121%23 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0229%23 Sept →
inferno13–30.0514%23 Sept →
inferno9–20.1431%23 Sept →
inferno11–130.0135%22 Sept →
inferno3–90.0344%22 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.098%22 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.1129%21 Sept →
inferno9–00.1125%21 Sept →
inferno8–80.0338%19 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0226%19 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.1233%19 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.