MathZSred

MathZSred — CS2 Stats

76561198883925290[U:1:923659562]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

675Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,501 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,501 → 1,501
+29Tracked matches · now 675
−3.4ppWin rate · 62.1% → 58.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 63 days played since 14 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,410 -4,623 16 Mar3 Jul · 14 days played
19,41024,033peak 24,03316 Mar3 Jul
24,033Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,501Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
63Days played since 2026-03-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,501
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 30 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMathZSredFACEITLevel 10 · 1,501 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,501csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning50
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateLLLWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.6pp headshot accuracy · −54ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.0
Utility6.5
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time592ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−4.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 10 Jul
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · mirage, 21 Apr
398msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · dust2, 24 Aug
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 8 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B29141548%0.00
mirageC1971237%-0.02
infernoB179853%0.00
cacheS118373%0.02
nukeB105550%0.01
ancientC73443%0.00
anubisS54180%-0.01
overpass2020%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

659Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
74.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust217949%1.1315.5
Mirage11552%1.1016.2
Inferno10760%1.2515.1
Nuke6346%1.1716.2
Anubis4551%1.3116.8
Cache4356%1.0913.9
Overpass4151%1.1916.9
Ancient4058%1.0415.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
87.6%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
585msReaction time
21.7%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
13.0%Flash assists
6.04HE damage / grenade
10.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.6639% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache2–13-0.070%15 Sept
dust29–130.0220%6 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0626%30 Aug
cache13–10.0321%27 Aug
dust213–160.0618%27 Aug
inferno13–2-0.0213%27 Aug
dust213–60.0915%27 Aug
cache13–70.0726%25 Aug
ancient13–100.0012%24 Aug
dust213–11-0.0518%24 Aug
cache13–3-0.0310%19 Aug
cache13–100.0026%18 Aug
anubis6–130.0519%13 Aug
dust28–13-0.0717%13 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0216%10 Aug
dust215–15-0.0223%8 Aug
mirage13–60.0217%8 Aug
dust213–60.0827%3 Aug
dust213–70.0330%1 Aug
inferno13–40.0420%1 Aug
dust210–130.0423%1 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0418%1 Aug
cache13–50.0513%27 Jul
nuke13–100.0513%27 Jul
mirage7–13-0.1313%26 Jul
dust210–13-0.0220%25 Jul
cache9–130.0519%21 Jul
inferno13–90.0437%21 Jul
dust23–13-0.0816%13 Jul
dust213–80.0318%12 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0124%12 Jul
dust213–100.0415%12 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0314%12 Jul
nuke13–60.0822%10 Jul
cache13–50.1833%10 Jul
dust210–130.0019%10 Jul
nuke7–130.0727%3 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0512%2 Jul
dust213–90.0227%30 Jun
ancient13–90.0118%19 Jun
inferno9–130.0515%18 Jun
nuke13–50.0424%18 Jun
ancient8–130.0217%17 Jun
nuke16–130.0524%16 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0029%12 Jun
dust24–13-0.0212%30 May
dust23–13-0.0210%30 May
mirage5–13-0.100%30 May
anubis13–8-0.0510%28 May
dust213–100.0112%17 May
inferno16–14-0.0212%16 May
cache13–9-0.0420%8 May
cache13–80.0210%6 May
cache9–13-0.0218%3 May
mirage15–15-0.0312%1 May
inferno13–110.0515%27 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0220%25 Apr
dust24–11-0.1222%25 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0642%24 Apr
mirage13–100.0418%23 Apr
dust213–100.0225%22 Apr
mirage13–10.0143%21 Apr
mirage13–90.0138%21 Apr
inferno6–130.0131%21 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0319%21 Apr
ancient11–130.0425%21 Apr
dust213–8-0.0224%20 Apr
dust23–13-0.0325%20 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0817%19 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0124%18 Apr
mirage9–130.0422%12 Apr
inferno13–16-0.0317%11 Apr
dust216–140.0216%10 Apr
dust214–160.0430%8 Apr
inferno13–00.1429%8 Apr
dust213–10.0536%8 Apr
dust213–160.0117%7 Apr
dust213–50.0521%7 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0418%4 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0811%3 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0439%3 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0214%1 Apr
mirage0–70.0327%1 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0214%31 Mar
mirage13–110.0225%31 Mar
inferno8–8-0.1027%27 Mar
inferno9–4-0.0124%27 Mar
anubis16–140.0115%26 Mar
inferno11–130.0628%22 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0320%21 Mar
dust210–13-0.0338%21 Mar
anubis13–6-0.0115%20 Mar
dust216–14-0.0229%19 Mar
overpass6–12-0.1123%19 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0125%19 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0217%18 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0323%16 Mar
mirage11–130.0122%16 Mar
nuke13–16-0.0115%14 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0227%14 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →