alpu

alpu — CS2 Stats

76561198876437121[U:1:916171393]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,353Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,720 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,720 → 1,720
+15Tracked matches · now 4,353
+10.4ppWin rate · 51.7% → 62.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 10 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,720 +0 30 Aug19 Sept · 3 observations
1,7201,720peak 1,72030 Aug19 Sept
1,720Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-03-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,720
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 31 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGalpuFACEITLevel 9 · 1,720 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,720csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning56
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55441Last 10055%Win rateLWWWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim4.8
Utility3.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 35% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning5.6
Utility3.8
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact9.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time649ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 698ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 24 Jun
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · vertigo, 20 Mar
438msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · nuke, 17 Sept
12–1Biggest win · nuke, 30 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
1210In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 18overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB30161453%-0.02
nukeS1812667%-0.03
anubisA127558%-0.03
cacheA117464%-0.03
dust2D93633%-0.01
ancientS96367%-0.04
overpassD51420%-0.06
inferno31233%-0.03
vertigo32167%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,311Matches
50%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
65.1ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage92250%0.7912.5
Ancient51550%0.7913.0
Nuke39348%0.8212.8
Anubis29550%0.8113.3
Dust222944%0.7512.1
Vertigo14445%0.7812.4
Overpass7845%0.6911.9
Inferno6537%0.6911.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
66.3%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
646msReaction time
58.0%T opening success
34.7%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
9.24HE damage / grenade
3.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4799 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.6665% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis14–16-0.0512%20 Sept
cache13–11-0.0721%20 Sept
inferno13–100.0134%20 Sept
cache13–11-0.0214%20 Sept
anubis16–19-0.0815%20 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0127%20 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0333%19 Sept
cache13–7-0.0424%19 Sept
cache16–12-0.0417%17 Sept
dust216–12-0.0229%17 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0326%17 Sept
cache13–9-0.0423%17 Sept
nuke16–12-0.0614%17 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0913%17 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0324%17 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0220%17 Sept
cache5–13-0.0330%17 Sept
nuke19–16-0.0623%16 Sept
dust29–130.0017%16 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0416%16 Sept
anubis13–4-0.0023%13 Sept
dust213–11-0.0020%13 Sept
anubis13–4-0.0719%13 Sept
cache11–13-0.0222%13 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0421%12 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0629%27 Aug
cache13–9-0.0227%23 Aug
ancient13–110.0020%23 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0512%23 Aug
dust23–13-0.0434%22 Aug
cache9–130.0223%22 Aug
nuke13–90.0033%22 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0814%22 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0221%22 Aug
dust210–13-0.0116%22 Aug
dust213–70.0124%22 Aug
mirage9–130.0126%16 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0416%16 Aug
cache4–13-0.0521%16 Aug
cache13–70.0136%16 Aug
nuke13–30.0114%16 Aug
nuke16–140.0018%16 Aug
anubis13–60.0517%15 Aug
ancient13–9-0.079%14 Aug
mirage16–140.0425%14 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0416%12 Aug
ancient9–13-0.1011%25 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0515%25 Jul
mirage13–80.0118%24 Jul
mirage13–80.0113%24 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0612%10 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0720%10 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0513%9 Jul
dust211–13-0.0321%3 Jul
nuke12–1-0.0612%30 Jun
mirage13–30.1321%24 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0418%24 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0516%23 Jun
overpass3–13-0.117%23 Jun
mirage11–130.0227%22 Jun
mirage19–17-0.0616%21 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0015%21 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0326%18 Jun
mirage13–100.018%18 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0714%5 Jun
nuke13–70.0220%5 Jun
mirage13–90.0210%4 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0012%29 May
mirage13–50.0117%29 May
anubis13–80.0222%28 May
ancient13–5-0.0113%28 May
ancient11–13-0.0523%28 May
mirage13–11-0.038%27 May
mirage5–13-0.0825%25 May
mirage7–13-0.1021%4 May
overpass8–13-0.0711%25 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0229%24 Apr
mirage13–30.0514%23 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0921%21 Apr
dust214–16-0.0317%19 Apr
mirage13–20.0016%19 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0414%12 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0722%10 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0112%6 Apr
dust211–13-0.0218%6 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0516%4 Apr
nuke13–70.0220%4 Apr
nuke15–19-0.0820%4 Apr
overpass13–16-0.0622%3 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0615%3 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0525%3 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0115%25 Mar
ancient16–19-0.0612%24 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0515%22 Mar
ancient13–5-0.0330%22 Mar
mirage13–70.0216%20 Mar
vertigo13–2-0.0443%20 Mar
nuke13–8-0.1114%20 Mar
vertigo5–13-0.0940%13 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0222%10 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →