Nipsu

Nipsu — CS2 Stats

VC76561198870692304[U:1:910426576]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,739Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,315Blue band · top ~32% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,694 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 14,315 → 14,315
0Faceit ELO · 1,694 → 1,694
+4Tracked matches · now 1,739
0.0ppWin rate · 40.0% → 40.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 13 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,315 +3,189 13 May19 Sept · 18 days played
11,12616,501peak 16,50113 May19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,694 +0 30 Aug19 Sept · 4 observations
1,6941,694peak 1,69430 Aug19 Sept
16,745Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,694Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-05-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,694
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 57 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,186 below peak (16,501)
  • +2,821 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 685 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNipsuFACEITLevel 9 · 1,694 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER14,315 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,694csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning55
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4753Last 10047%Win rateLLWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · +6.4pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility5.7
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.5
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time590ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 6 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · nuke, 13 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · nuke, 14 Sept
13–0Biggest win · office, 9 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
613In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 11mirageWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2011955%0.01
mirageC1971237%-0.03
anubisC146843%0.02
infernoB137654%-0.00
dust2B126650%0.00
nukeA117464%-0.02
vertigo31233%-0.00
office31233%-0.00
cache3030%-0.04
overpass110100%0.09
alpine1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

959Matches
50%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
80.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage23747%1.1416.3
Ancient15751%1.1916.2
Nuke12449%1.2015.9
Anubis11558%1.2715.3
Inferno9851%1.1416.1
Dust29545%1.1516.8
Overpass3749%1.2117.0
Train2962%1.0116.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.4%Spray accuracy
72.9%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
586msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
12.2%Flash assists
10.29HE damage / grenade
9.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4976 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2159% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–16-0.0514%16 Sept
dust211–130.0219%16 Sept
dust213–60.1011%15 Sept
nuke13–20.1639%14 Sept
inferno13–80.044%14 Sept
inferno13–90.0117%7 Sept
ancient13–40.2118%6 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0110%6 Sept
dust214–16-0.0222%6 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0533%28 Aug
nuke2–13-0.1211%28 Aug
office0–13-0.038%23 Aug
ancient11–13-0.008%22 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0614%19 Aug
cache14–160.0218%18 Aug
dust213–9-0.0113%17 Aug
inferno17–190.0616%17 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0613%16 Aug
mirage11–130.0120%15 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.045%15 Aug
anubis8–130.0716%14 Aug
vertigo13–40.088%14 Aug
ancient13–80.0210%14 Aug
anubis13–90.0013%14 Aug
mirage2–13-0.1111%13 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0516%13 Aug
mirage8–130.0516%12 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0516%12 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0117%11 Aug
ancient16–140.0121%11 Aug
ancient1–5-0.0427%10 Aug
anubis13–20.1529%10 Aug
inferno4–90.0319%10 Aug
nuke2–13-0.150%10 Aug
mirage13–90.0014%9 Aug
office9–13-0.0421%9 Aug
office13–00.0717%9 Aug
dust25–130.0615%8 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0225%5 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0612%5 Aug
inferno16–130.0117%30 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0118%28 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0121%28 Jul
inferno16–14-0.039%28 Jul
anubis13–70.0723%27 Jul
nuke13–60.0311%27 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0115%24 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0419%23 Jul
ancient13–110.0717%22 Jul
anubis11–130.0213%22 Jul
ancient13–10.078%22 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0118%20 Jul
dust213–20.0820%20 Jul
mirage4–13-0.065%18 Jul
ancient12–7-0.0432%18 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0335%18 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0113%18 Jul
ancient13–60.0621%17 Jul
cache2–8-0.118%15 Jul
anubis13–80.0622%13 Jul
dust213–60.0323%13 Jul
ancient13–110.0119%13 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0511%13 Jul
nuke13–00.01100%13 Jul
nuke0–13-0.050%12 Jul
ancient13–1-0.0540%12 Jul
dust27–13-0.0317%12 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0015%12 Jul
dust210–13-0.0717%11 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0411%11 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0213%11 Jul
nuke13–70.0329%11 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0711%11 Jul
dust216–12-0.0116%11 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0118%11 Jul
mirage6–130.0017%11 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0129%11 Jul
cache1–13-0.0441%11 Jul
mirage4–130.0021%11 Jul
mirage13–110.0517%11 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0122%10 Jul
mirage13–2-0.090%10 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0611%3 Jul
dust213–10-0.0518%2 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0316%2 Jul
overpass13–30.096%2 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0520%2 Jul
mirage13–90.0127%2 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0429%2 Jul
anubis13–10.0017%2 Jul
ancient13–20.0625%17 Jun
alpine2–4-0.100%17 Jun
inferno13–20.016%17 Jun
anubis17–19-0.0116%11 Jun
dust24–13-0.0717%9 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0133%8 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0920%2 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0112%2 Jun
ancient9–130.0325%14 May
anubis2–130.0119%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →