Meat Pie

Meat Pie — CS2 Stats

76561198856051421[U:1:895785693]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

834Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating16,868Purple band · top ~21% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+534Premier CS Rating · 16,334 → 16,868

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,868 +6,217 24 Aug – 24 Oct · 33 days played
10,65117,381peak 17,38124 Aug24 Oct
17,398Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-08-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 513 below peak (17,381)
  • +4,009 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,132 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMeat PieFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER16,868 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning53
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–38–3Last 10059%Win rateWLWWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim4.3
Utility5.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning5.3
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time577ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 26 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 26 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 1 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 5 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
13–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 79% over 14anubisWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2917–1259%-0.01
mirageB2713–1448%-0.01
ancientS1411–379%-0.00
cacheB84–450%-0.00
nukeS86–275%0.01
anubisC73–443%-0.05
infernoS75–271%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

31Matches
35%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
65.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2650%1.2211.8
Inferno367%0.9713.7
Mirage250%0.6211.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
27.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.0%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
584msReaction time
39.9%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
7.46HE damage / grenade
8.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.8693% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0225%24 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0814%24 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0015%24 Oct →
ancient13–30.1018%24 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0513%23 Oct →
nuke4–130.0310%23 Oct →
ancient13–40.0511%23 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.118%22 Oct →
cache16–13-0.0514%22 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0613%22 Oct →
cache7–130.0427%21 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0725%21 Oct →
mirage13–110.0115%20 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0122%20 Oct →
cache11–13-0.059%19 Oct →
ancient13–60.0330%19 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.050%18 Oct →
dust213–40.0222%18 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0319%17 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.095%17 Oct →
dust213–70.0112%17 Oct →
dust210–130.0122%17 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.067%15 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0219%15 Oct →
dust213–50.0214%15 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0111%14 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0219%14 Oct →
mirage11–3-0.036%9 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0219%9 Oct →
mirage13–40.0620%7 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0217%7 Oct →
ancient13–2-0.0125%5 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0123%5 Oct →
anubis13–90.0015%5 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0115%5 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.049%5 Oct →
dust211–130.0310%4 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0111%3 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.064%3 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0420%3 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0511%1 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0314%1 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0720%1 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0415%30 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0010%30 Sept →
cache9–130.0011%30 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0513%30 Sept →
mirage13–100.0313%29 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0113%29 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0023%28 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0416%28 Sept →
cache13–40.1119%26 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0313%26 Sept →
mirage13–40.0617%26 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0811%26 Sept →
mirage13–20.0343%26 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0122%26 Sept →
cache13–2-0.0143%26 Sept →
nuke13–50.042%26 Sept →
ancient13–2-0.0012%26 Sept →
nuke14–160.0215%26 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0113%24 Sept →
dust211–130.0321%24 Sept →
dust213–90.038%20 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0617%19 Sept →
dust29–130.0329%19 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0515%19 Sept →
mirage6–130.0410%15 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0317%13 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0518%13 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0513%12 Sept →
dust22–13-0.1010%12 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0411%12 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0018%12 Sept →
mirage13–60.0118%10 Sept →
mirage13–70.1018%10 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0223%5 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0227%5 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0315%5 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0020%5 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0521%5 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0021%5 Sept →
inferno13–60.0513%5 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0518%3 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0310%3 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0117%2 Sept →
dust215–150.0315%2 Sept →
mirage13–110.0728%1 Sept →
nuke13–20.0520%1 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0314%29 Aug →
ancient13–80.0919%29 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0711%29 Aug →
ancient13–70.0212%29 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0120%29 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0218%27 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0315%24 Aug →
dust213–90.0222%20 Aug →
mirage13–160.0125%20 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0422%15 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0711%15 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.