brnz4n

brnz4n — CS2 Stats

PRO“brenimm;v”MIBRBrazilRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561198855876580[U:1:895610852]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,968Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,155Top 25% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40069 of 251258 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,155 -588 27 Sept – 4 Oct · 2 days played
23,15523,743peak 23,74327 Sept4 Oct
Faceit ELO: 3,450 +0 28 Aug – 23 Sept · 8 observations
3,4503,450peak 3,45028 Aug23 Sept
23,743Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,450Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-02-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,450
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 — 50 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 588 below peak (23,743)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,845 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbrnz4nPREMIER23,155 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,450csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning68
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–43Last 10057%Win rateLWWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +4.8pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility5.9
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels6.2
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.8
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time484ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 503ms → last ⅓ avg 484ms
Headshot accuracy28.7%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 26.9% → last ⅓ avg 28.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 12 Jul →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 21 Sept →
305msFastest reaction time · 1–8 · dust2, 20 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 22 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12overpassWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2717–1063%0.03
nukeA1710–759%0.00
infernoA159–660%0.01
ancientB136–746%-0.03
anubisS128–467%0.01
dust2B63–350%0.04
overpassD60–60%-0.02
cache—44–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,475Matches
70%Win rate
1.49Avg K/D
92.5ADR
62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
27Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage52464%1.4619.7
Anubis15365%1.3817.7
Dust213470%1.4820.0
Ancient11971%1.3717.2
Nuke5463%1.3216.4
Inferno4080%1.3617.3
Vertigo2696%1.6818.7
Train1464%1.3618.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$6,774Inventory value36ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Butterfly Knife | Fade (Factory New)$1,805★ Specialist Gloves | Crimson Kimono (Well-Worn)$1,241AK-47 | Fire Serpent (Field-Tested)$1,200M4A4 | Eye of Horus (Minimal Wear)$768Souvenir AWP | Queen's Gambit (Minimal Wear)$379M4A1-S | Printstream (Field-Tested)$290

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.7%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
487msReaction time
36.1%T opening success
64.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
10.3%Flash assists
6.07HE damage / grenade
8.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.0805% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis3–4-0.0236%4 Oct →
anubis13–70.0921%27 Sept →
cache13–50.0626%23 Sept →
dust213–60.1225%22 Sept →
dust23–130.0757%21 Sept →
dust21–80.0342%20 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0128%29 Aug →
cache13–70.0226%28 Aug →
mirage13–30.2134%26 Aug →
mirage13–110.0833%25 Aug →
inferno13–70.1028%18 Aug →
mirage13–40.0233%17 Aug →
nuke13–60.1238%17 Aug →
nuke11–130.0321%16 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0137%16 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0320%14 Aug →
cache13–100.0125%14 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0140%12 Aug →
cache13–90.0120%2 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0319%2 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0215%1 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0129%1 Aug →
mirage13–110.0519%30 Jul →
nuke13–20.0225%29 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0426%29 Jul →
mirage19–17-0.0611%29 Jul →
inferno13–80.0324%28 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0425%28 Jul →
mirage13–20.2631%12 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0133%5 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0522%5 Jul →
anubis16–130.0432%4 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0246%4 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0326%4 Jul →
mirage13–20.0427%3 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0217%2 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.0320%1 Jul →
overpass1–70.0611%21 Jun →
mirage9–130.0329%19 Jun →
dust24–6-0.0921%19 Jun →
mirage13–50.1131%18 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0514%8 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0120%8 Jun →
mirage13–70.0127%8 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0427%7 Jun →
mirage1–13-0.0517%6 Jun →
nuke2–00.0920%6 Jun →
nuke11–80.0420%6 Jun →
inferno13–2-0.0026%4 Jun →
anubis0–3-0.090%4 Jun →
anubis13–20.0330%4 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0320%3 Jun →
nuke16–14-0.0215%2 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0338%2 Jun →
mirage13–30.0944%27 May →
mirage10–130.0631%27 May →
anubis13–70.0738%26 May →
ancient1–13-0.0727%24 May →
overpass3–13-0.0219%24 May →
mirage12–16-0.0630%23 May →
inferno5–13-0.0423%23 May →
ancient13–2-0.0530%22 May →
mirage10–13-0.0626%22 May →
inferno13–10.0130%22 May →
ancient13–4-0.0526%20 May →
mirage13–60.0942%20 May →
anubis13–9-0.0134%20 May →
ancient2–9-0.0329%21 Apr →
ancient13–16-0.0824%9 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0429%9 Apr →
inferno13–90.0431%9 Apr →
anubis13–90.0233%7 Apr →
mirage13–70.0232%7 Apr →
nuke13–9-0.0324%6 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0124%6 Apr →
inferno13–10-0.0124%6 Apr →
ancient13–110.0016%5 Apr →
anubis13–100.0522%5 Apr →
overpass11–13-0.0130%5 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0413%4 Apr →
overpass5–13-0.1027%4 Apr →
inferno13–60.0132%3 Apr →
ancient13–10-0.0136%28 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.0518%28 Mar →
overpass8–13-0.0421%28 Mar →
nuke11–13-0.0532%26 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.0119%26 Mar →
ancient16–12-0.0025%26 Mar →
mirage13–20.0431%26 Mar →
nuke13–30.0315%26 Mar →
anubis13–60.0026%15 Mar →
dust213–70.0339%15 Mar →
dust213–110.0738%6 Mar →
anubis14–160.0229%2 Mar →
mirage13–70.0329%2 Mar →
inferno13–80.1029%2 Mar →
overpass11–130.0125%2 Mar →
nuke16–19-0.0230%2 Mar →
mirage13–100.0634%28 Feb →
anubis7–11-0.0819%28 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.