☣C≡N☣Mr.Miemz☣ — CS2 Stats

76561198855269943[U:1:895004215]

4,813Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.3 Developing

Premier CS Rating10,548Blue band · top ~52% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#8644 of 11888 tracked

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55

Positioning44

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–53–3Last 10044%Win rateLLLLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5

Aggression5.9

Utility5.0

Positioning4.4

Opening Duels1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5

Positioning4.4

Utility5.0

Mechanics5.3

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time559ms−67ms

first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms

Headshot accuracy17.2%−1.3%

first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — inferno 13–7

13–1Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

L5Current streak

8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 14dust2Weakest map · 18% over 22

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	25	13–12	52%	0.00
dust2	D	22	4–18	18%	-0.03
nuke	C	16	7–9	44%	-0.00
cache	A	14	9–5	64%	-0.01
mirage	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.02
ancient	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.02
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy

29.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

27.9%Spray accuracy

74.0%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

559msReaction time

28.3%T opening success

46.4%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

2.0%Flash assists

7.34HE damage / grenade

5.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.3085% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	4–13	0.02	11%	28 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	19%	28 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.03	15%	27 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	30%	27 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	12%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	15%	27 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	17%	27 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	22%	27 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	27%	26 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.00	12%	26 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	3%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	27%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.08	21%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.01	16%	21 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.06	26%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.06	15%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.06	19%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	30%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.03	20%	21 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.04	13%	21 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.01	15%	21 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.02	22%	21 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	13%	21 Aug →
nuke	12–16	-0.04	23%	20 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	11%	20 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	17%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	14%	20 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	17%	20 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.08	19%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	6%	20 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	13%	19 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.08	20%	19 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.01	8%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.01	22%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	13%	19 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.05	23%	19 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	17%	19 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	14%	19 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	19%	18 Aug →
inferno	16–13	-0.02	16%	18 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	16%	18 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	27%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–1	0.05	13%	17 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	15%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.00	13%	13 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	26%	13 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	28%	13 Aug →
ancient	1–10	-0.05	19%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	10%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.01	10%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	14%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.07	21%	12 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.03	23%	12 Aug →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	27%	12 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.02	14%	12 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	22%	12 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	36%	11 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.07	19%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.09	28%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.01	18%	11 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	20%	11 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	18%	11 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	19%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.08	24%	11 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	13%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.00	26%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	15%	10 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	20%	10 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.05	23%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.04	16%	10 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.00	20%	3 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	24%	3 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	23%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.00	23%	3 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.02	28%	3 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.05	18%	2 Aug →
ancient	16–12	-0.01	11%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	20%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.01	17%	2 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.00	22%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.04	15%	2 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.07	31%	2 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.02	23%	28 Jul →
cache	16–13	-0.06	11%	28 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	18%	28 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.01	5%	28 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	12%	28 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	11%	27 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	19%	27 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.03	18%	27 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.05	25%	27 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.01	24%	27 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.10	28%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.09	18%	27 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	23%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	14%	26 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.06	12%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.02	9%	26 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	17%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–16	-0.01	15%	26 Jul →