and

and — CS2 Stats

76561198853446522[U:1:893180794]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,674Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,919Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64116 of 231628 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 28 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,919 -1,119 10 Sept20 Sept · 6 days played
20,91922,166peak 22,16610 Sept20 Sept
22,166Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-07-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,247 below peak (22,166)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,081 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGandFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,919 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning60
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48439Last 10048%Win rateLTWLLWLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · 0ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 352 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 626ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 626ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility3.7
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning6.0
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time625ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 625ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%−7.6%
first ⅓ avg 31.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 10 Sept
67%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · cache, 10 Aug
453msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · cache, 24 Aug
13–0Biggest win · cache, 30 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 27anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27171063%0.00
nukeB21111052%-0.00
infernoC167944%-0.01
cacheC114736%-0.02
dust2C73443%-0.04
anubisD61517%-0.05
ancient31233%-0.01
office31233%0.01
vertigo2020%-0.02
fachwerk1010%-0.06
shelter110100%-0.04
boulder110100%-0.07
overpass110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

134Matches
60%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
71.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1567%0.9513.5
Anubis1464%1.0015.1
Nuke1060%0.9715.6
Ancient743%0.7913.0
Inferno667%0.7515.5
Cache450%0.8712.5
Dust2333%0.7513.0
Vertigo3100%0.769.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.7%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
618msReaction time
51.6%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
9.86HE damage / grenade
5.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4528 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0427%19 Sept
inferno12–12-0.0318%19 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0127%19 Sept
ancient11–130.0617%19 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0324%19 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0614%19 Sept
vertigo7–13-0.0122%18 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0317%18 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0438%18 Sept
cache13–8-0.0520%18 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0425%18 Sept
mirage13–40.0531%18 Sept
mirage13–70.0416%15 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0232%15 Sept
mirage11–130.0225%15 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0127%15 Sept
anubis8–13-0.1230%12 Sept
fachwerk1–13-0.0613%12 Sept
shelter13–5-0.0417%12 Sept
boulder13–8-0.0712%12 Sept
dust29–13-0.0525%12 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0731%11 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0818%11 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0443%11 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0637%11 Sept
cache13–10-0.0414%11 Sept
anubis4–13-0.059%11 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0131%11 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0329%11 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0138%11 Sept
dust213–70.0321%11 Sept
mirage13–50.1326%10 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0222%10 Sept
inferno13–10.0830%10 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0725%10 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0529%6 Sept
nuke15–15-0.0232%5 Sept
mirage9–130.0027%5 Sept
cache9–13-0.0722%5 Sept
anubis11–130.0124%5 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0636%4 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0225%4 Sept
office5–13-0.0223%4 Sept
dust29–13-0.0515%4 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0121%4 Sept
nuke13–30.0415%4 Sept
inferno12–120.0121%4 Sept
office12–12-0.0222%2 Sept
office13–40.0930%2 Sept
nuke11–130.0430%31 Aug
inferno13–110.0839%31 Aug
mirage11–130.0034%31 Aug
cache13–00.0133%30 Aug
nuke13–10.0528%30 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0135%29 Aug
cache8–130.0235%29 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0227%29 Aug
inferno20–220.0122%26 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0531%25 Aug
nuke13–11-0.039%25 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0413%24 Aug
nuke13–00.0647%24 Aug
cache13–40.0427%24 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0228%17 Aug
nuke10–130.0333%17 Aug
dust213–7-0.0130%17 Aug
cache8–13-0.0326%17 Aug
mirage7–0-0.0145%17 Aug
mirage13–100.0132%16 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0134%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0722%15 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0212%12 Aug
nuke13–90.0237%12 Aug
mirage7–130.1136%12 Aug
cache4–13-0.0567%10 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0329%10 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0444%10 Aug
mirage8–130.0346%10 Aug
nuke13–70.0233%8 Aug
inferno13–80.0123%7 Aug
mirage13–90.0342%7 Aug
cache6–130.0335%7 Aug
dust213–11-0.0726%7 Aug
mirage13–70.0834%7 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0141%5 Aug
dust210–13-0.1124%5 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0427%5 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0624%5 Aug
cache9–13-0.0335%5 Aug
mirage12–120.0836%5 Aug
overpass13–8-0.0122%4 Aug
mirage6–13-0.1046%3 Aug
dust211–13-0.0338%3 Aug
cache12–12-0.0121%3 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0420%3 Aug
vertigo8–8-0.0323%3 Aug
nuke13–40.0429%3 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0323%3 Aug
mirage13–60.0018%31 Jul
nuke12–120.0123%28 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →