prizzzle

prizzzle — CS2 Stats

GB76561198853045974[U:1:892780246]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,202Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,041Top 50% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#69162 of 259178 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,494 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,041 +1,728 29 Aug – 28 Oct · 20 days played
18,78421,041peak 21,04129 Aug28 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,494 +0 29 Aug – 23 Sept · 7 observations
1,4941,494peak 1,49429 Aug23 Sept
21,045Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,494Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,494
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 37 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,041
  • +1,061 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,959 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGprizzzleFACEITLevel 6 · 1,494 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER21,041 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,494csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning46
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateLLWLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.4
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.6
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time570ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy13.8%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 27 Oct →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · cache, 28 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 16 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 15infernoWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1710–759%-0.03
cacheS1511–473%-0.01
nukeB157–847%-0.02
anubisB136–746%-0.03
dust2C125–742%-0.02
mirageA116–555%0.01
infernoD103–730%-0.04
vertigoB63–350%-0.02
poseidon—10–10%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,011Matches
52%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
72.2ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
24Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9044%0.9213.4
Ancient6256%0.9113.8
Dust26154%0.9614.5
Nuke5250%0.9514.4
Anubis5040%0.8112.9
Inferno4455%0.8613.3
Cache2171%0.9414.2
Vertigo1839%0.8413.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.8%Headshot accuracy
41.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
573msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
28.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
8.46HE damage / grenade
5.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.832% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.9497% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
poseidon2–9-0.0914%29 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0526%29 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0117%28 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0912%28 Oct →
cache13–70.0213%28 Oct →
anubis13–20.0526%28 Oct →
cache8–130.0113%27 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.037%27 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.018%27 Oct →
dust213–30.0924%27 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0711%27 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.059%26 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.069%26 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0516%26 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0212%26 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.038%26 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.053%25 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.067%25 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0224%25 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0222%22 Oct →
cache13–6-0.005%22 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0013%22 Oct →
nuke11–130.0112%22 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.048%16 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0010%16 Oct →
vertigo7–13-0.0313%16 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0712%16 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0713%16 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0514%15 Oct →
inferno9–130.0017%15 Oct →
dust213–10-0.079%14 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0129%14 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0119%14 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0221%14 Oct →
cache15–15-0.019%14 Oct →
ancient2–130.0226%13 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0520%13 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.019%13 Oct →
mirage4–00.040%13 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0317%12 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.069%12 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0512%11 Oct →
nuke13–100.0213%11 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0717%11 Oct →
cache13–6-0.039%11 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.048%11 Oct →
cache13–40.0022%11 Oct →
nuke10–130.0014%10 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0323%10 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.008%10 Oct →
anubis16–130.0012%10 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0212%10 Oct →
anubis1–13-0.088%10 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.018%10 Oct →
anubis13–90.0328%9 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.063%9 Oct →
mirage12–120.0516%9 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0424%8 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0410%8 Oct →
vertigo13–8-0.029%8 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0317%7 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.118%7 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0226%7 Oct →
mirage16–120.0121%7 Oct →
mirage13–30.0622%6 Oct →
dust23–130.0424%6 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.049%6 Oct →
cache16–12-0.0115%4 Oct →
ancient13–70.0019%4 Oct →
dust29–130.0016%3 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0519%3 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0320%3 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0924%2 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0123%2 Oct →
nuke13–30.0617%2 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0522%2 Oct →
mirage10–130.0111%1 Oct →
cache12–120.0623%1 Oct →
ancient13–50.0126%30 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.1014%30 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0219%30 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.078%30 Sept →
nuke13–60.0716%30 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0413%28 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0129%28 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0413%27 Sept →
mirage13–50.0125%27 Sept →
cache13–00.0619%27 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0616%27 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0613%27 Sept →
mirage13–50.0716%27 Sept →
cache16–14-0.072%11 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.086%11 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.045%11 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0119%11 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0217%10 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0322%10 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0113%10 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.008%9 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0422%9 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.