prizzzle — CS2 Stats

76561198853045974[U:1:892780246]✓ No bans

2,048Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,313Purple band · top ~11.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11157 of 23896 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,494 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGprizzzleFACEITLevel 7 · 1,494 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,313 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning40
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51472Last 10051%Win rateLLLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2
Aggression1.2
Utility5.8
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.9° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.0
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time548ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy12.7%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 13.5% → last ⅓ avg 12.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–7
132Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
L7Current streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 16anubisWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB21111052%-0.01
ancientS1612475%0.00
cacheB157847%-0.02
anubisD1551033%-0.01
infernoS139469%-0.01
mirageC94544%-0.00
dust2C73443%0.01
vertigo4040%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

912Matches
52%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
73.3ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
24Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7944%0.9513.7
Dust25159%1.0015.0
Ancient4753%0.9714.3
Nuke3954%0.9914.8
Inferno3063%0.9013.3
Anubis2945%0.8213.0
Overpass1443%0.8413.0
Vertigo1331%0.8213.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.4%Headshot accuracy
45.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
49.0%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
540msReaction time
18.3%T opening success
37.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
8.56HE damage / grenade
4.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.4115% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.2553% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.0416%28 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0315%28 Aug
dust21–13-0.057%26 Aug
nuke4–7-0.0820%25 Aug
dust29–130.0513%25 Aug
anubis0–40.0443%25 Aug
anubis8–13-0.067%25 Aug
dust213–60.0219%24 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.015%11 Aug
ancient13–70.0413%11 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0613%11 Aug
anubis13–90.0516%11 Aug
cache13–20.026%10 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0411%10 Aug
inferno13–40.0019%10 Aug
ancient7–13-0.062%10 Aug
vertigo6–7-0.049%9 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0116%9 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0513%9 Aug
inferno13–5-0.018%7 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0417%7 Aug
anubis13–70.0211%7 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0711%7 Aug
nuke8–13-0.039%7 Aug
inferno13–60.1017%6 Aug
anubis13–70.0016%6 Aug
ancient8–130.0116%6 Aug
cache13–90.008%6 Aug
vertigo10–130.0212%5 Aug
nuke13–50.0611%5 Aug
ancient13–2-0.004%5 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.015%5 Aug
mirage7–130.0112%3 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0313%3 Aug
cache18–22-0.019%3 Aug
ancient13–70.0910%2 Aug
anubis17–190.0211%2 Aug
nuke13–100.0016%2 Aug
nuke11–130.0217%31 Jul
anubis7–13-0.029%31 Jul
cache13–80.0112%31 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0214%31 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0112%28 Jul
dust213–50.1016%28 Jul
ancient13–110.0014%27 Jul
nuke7–13-0.038%27 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0310%26 Jul
inferno13–70.0512%26 Jul
cache13–50.0215%26 Jul
dust213–30.0228%26 Jul
mirage1–10-0.0419%26 Jul
cache10–13-0.0213%25 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0111%25 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0418%25 Jul
nuke8–130.0821%23 Jul
mirage13–70.127%23 Jul
dust29–130.0415%23 Jul
cache11–13-0.0612%23 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0013%23 Jul
dust27–13-0.098%22 Jul
cache13–4-0.0412%22 Jul
mirage1–10-0.014%22 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0514%20 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0318%20 Jul
inferno13–70.0115%20 Jul
ancient13–30.0920%20 Jul
anubis13–90.0311%19 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0411%19 Jul
nuke17–19-0.0312%19 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0312%18 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0219%18 Jul
nuke13–50.088%18 Jul
ancient13–9-0.018%18 Jul
nuke16–12-0.008%17 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0620%17 Jul
mirage13–90.0114%17 Jul
anubis5–13-0.037%17 Jul
cache9–13-0.087%17 Jul
cache8–13-0.0315%16 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0511%16 Jul
inferno10–13-0.048%16 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0216%16 Jul
cache3–13-0.0217%16 Jul
ancient13–100.0717%16 Jul
anubis4–130.0116%16 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0616%14 Jul
inferno9–130.0110%14 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0418%14 Jul
cache6–13-0.059%14 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0323%13 Jul
ancient13–60.0212%13 Jul
cache13–40.038%13 Jul
nuke13–7-0.078%13 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0218%13 Jul
nuke13–90.0213%12 Jul
inferno7–0-0.0320%12 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0515%12 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0413%12 Jul
nuke6–13-0.008%10 Jul
cache13–20.0129%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →