NBA YoungKirk

NBA YoungKirk — CS2 Stats

UG76561198852886975[U:1:892621247]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,473Tracked matches38%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating21,204Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#59921 of 227098 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 21 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,204 -1,615 22 Jul14 Sept · 22 days played
21,20423,898peak 23,89822 Jul14 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,574 +0 28 Aug10 Sept · 7 observations
1,5741,574peak 1,57428 Aug10 Sept
23,898Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,574Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-07-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,574
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 177 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,694 below peak (23,898)
  • -1,219 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,796 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNBA YoungKirkPREMIER21,204 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,574csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning55
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44488Last 10044%Win rateLLWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.2
Utility5.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.5
Utility5.6
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time566ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–2 · fachwerk, 5 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–9 · inferno, 21 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 17 Aug
13–2Biggest win · vertigo, 7 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
513In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB1991047%-0.01
mirageD1551033%0.01
cacheC145936%0.02
anubisC135838%0.02
ancientA95456%0.03
nukeD93633%-0.01
vertigoS75271%0.02
dust2C73443%-0.01
overpass2020%-0.05
boulder21150%-0.01
fachwerk220100%0.11
poseidon110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

571Matches
52%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
81.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12557%1.0015.3
Anubis10758%1.1116.9
Ancient8849%1.0715.2
Vertigo8156%1.1215.8
Dust25852%1.1116.6
Inferno5733%1.0016.3
Nuke3850%1.2617.6
Overpass1050%1.2720.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
70.0%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
571msReaction time
44.4%T opening success
58.8%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
13.04HE damage / grenade
7.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4616 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0011%16 Sept
inferno11–13-0.038%14 Sept
vertigo13–7-0.0112%14 Sept
anubis13–40.0320%10 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0518%9 Sept
cache2–13-0.0917%9 Sept
dust27–13-0.067%9 Sept
vertigo13–20.0615%7 Sept
ancient13–20.1322%7 Sept
anubis9–20.0524%7 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0517%5 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0110%4 Sept
cache13–70.0619%4 Sept
inferno13–2-0.0412%3 Sept
ancient4–130.0312%3 Sept
nuke1–13-0.0816%3 Sept
overpass12–12-0.0513%3 Sept
mirage13–110.0213%31 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0219%31 Aug
dust29–13-0.0216%30 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0016%30 Aug
vertigo13–90.0220%29 Aug
ancient11–130.0619%28 Aug
cache7–130.0129%28 Aug
inferno7–90.0316%26 Aug
anubis2–13-0.048%26 Aug
dust27–13-0.0212%26 Aug
dust213–30.0125%25 Aug
boulder7–13-0.0320%25 Aug
vertigo11–130.0313%25 Aug
mirage7–130.0222%25 Aug
cache13–80.0113%25 Aug
cache12–12-0.0119%25 Aug
vertigo13–50.0327%25 Aug
inferno9–6-0.0515%25 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0117%19 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0312%19 Aug
cache13–80.1516%19 Aug
mirage13–100.1313%19 Aug
mirage7–130.018%17 Aug
cache11–130.0210%17 Aug
overpass9–13-0.0510%15 Aug
inferno13–60.0319%15 Aug
anubis13–70.0211%15 Aug
inferno7–90.0417%13 Aug
nuke9–60.1520%13 Aug
cache12–120.109%12 Aug
mirage4–13-0.089%12 Aug
boulder13–100.0218%12 Aug
dust213–110.0312%11 Aug
ancient13–100.0111%11 Aug
inferno13–70.0318%8 Aug
cache12–12-0.0517%8 Aug
inferno7–130.0211%8 Aug
cache12–12-0.0117%6 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0512%5 Aug
vertigo13–90.0720%5 Aug
fachwerk3–30.047%5 Aug
fachwerk13–20.1816%5 Aug
anubis10–130.0115%5 Aug
nuke9–2-0.0117%4 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0416%4 Aug
inferno13–90.0310%4 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0413%4 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0210%4 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0612%4 Aug
anubis13–60.0713%4 Aug
cache13–50.0717%4 Aug
nuke5–90.0113%4 Aug
anubis3–13-0.009%2 Aug
nuke8–8-0.108%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.0313%2 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0310%2 Aug
mirage13–110.0417%30 Jul
inferno11–13-0.029%30 Jul
inferno8–80.0318%30 Jul
poseidon9–5-0.0418%30 Jul
inferno1–9-0.1513%30 Jul
mirage6–130.019%28 Jul
anubis11–130.0416%27 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0013%25 Jul
cache4–13-0.0118%25 Jul
cache13–80.0722%24 Jul
anubis13–30.0724%24 Jul
mirage12–120.0715%23 Jul
anubis10–13-0.038%23 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0215%23 Jul
ancient13–70.0310%23 Jul
inferno16–120.0721%23 Jul
dust213–110.0226%22 Jul
dust28–13-0.0118%22 Jul
mirage16–130.1013%22 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0119%22 Jul
inferno13–100.0623%22 Jul
anubis9–130.0921%22 Jul
nuke13–50.0512%22 Jul
ancient13–70.0416%22 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0014%21 Jul
mirage2–13-0.120%21 Jul
inferno1–9-0.15100%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →