红发巨人  Hóng fā jùrén

红发巨人 Hóng fā jùrén — CS2 Stats

US76561198850196269[U:1:889930541]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

357Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,655Blue band · top ~30.2% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 357 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 29 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,655 +1,508 13 Apr30 Aug · 29 days played
12,64316,713peak 16,71313 Apr30 Aug
17,348Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2025-09-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,058 below peak (16,713)
  • -2,058 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 345 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG红发巨人 Hóng fā jùrénPREMIER14,655 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning41
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48475Last 10048%Win rateLLWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · +8.7pp headshot accuracy · +74ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 735ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 702ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 665ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility3.0
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.1
Utility3.0
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time637ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 674ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 1 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–10 · ancient, 2 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 4 Jun
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 4 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 27vertigoWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27171063%-0.01
nukeA22121055%-0.01
dust2D124833%0.01
ancientC104640%-0.03
anubisC83538%-0.02
vertigoD6060%-0.04
officeA53260%-0.02
overpass42250%0.02
inferno21150%-0.02
poseidon220100%0.04
cache2020%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
33%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
59.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
72.7%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
639msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.29Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
6.01HE damage / grenade
6.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2898 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.9565% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategyVertigo grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office3–13-0.0445%3 Jul
ancient2–10-0.0850%2 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0316%30 Jun
dust28–13-0.033%30 Jun
nuke6–9-0.047%30 Jun
nuke7–13-0.1120%30 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0517%29 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0419%29 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0216%29 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0227%28 Jun
office13–10-0.0112%24 Jun
nuke7–90.0612%24 Jun
mirage4–13-0.046%23 Jun
mirage8–20.0511%23 Jun
office13–7-0.0315%22 Jun
dust23–130.0511%22 Jun
office13–70.0013%21 Jun
nuke13–90.0317%21 Jun
vertigo9–13-0.0621%19 Jun
vertigo8–80.0815%19 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0911%6 Jun
dust22–13-0.0627%4 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0613%4 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0318%4 Jun
mirage13–20.0111%4 Jun
ancient13–00.0320%4 Jun
mirage7–130.0027%3 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0630%3 Jun
nuke13–110.0016%1 Jun
mirage16–140.0115%1 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0310%1 Jun
mirage13–30.1625%1 Jun
dust213–10-0.0819%1 Jun
nuke13–10.0414%1 Jun
dust213–30.0726%1 Jun
nuke13–20.0818%1 Jun
nuke12–120.0519%30 May
vertigo2–13-0.0713%30 May
nuke13–90.0124%30 May
ancient15–15-0.074%30 May
anubis10–13-0.096%30 May
inferno13–100.0124%30 May
dust210–13-0.0424%30 May
overpass13–100.0016%28 May
nuke11–13-0.0114%28 May
nuke9–70.0014%28 May
nuke13–5-0.048%28 May
mirage13–80.0020%28 May
poseidon9–50.0211%27 May
dust211–13-0.0311%27 May
nuke9–40.0025%25 May
anubis11–13-0.0528%25 May
mirage13–10-0.0223%25 May
mirage13–90.049%25 May
ancient6–13-0.0315%25 May
ancient15–15-0.0314%25 May
mirage13–80.0825%25 May
anubis13–80.0121%23 May
mirage13–00.0524%22 May
mirage3–13-0.0219%22 May
nuke1–13-0.069%21 May
mirage13–10-0.018%21 May
mirage13–3-0.0111%20 May
mirage13–7-0.0322%20 May
anubis14–16-0.0210%20 May
nuke16–14-0.0116%19 May
dust211–130.0714%18 May
poseidon9–50.0512%18 May
office8–13-0.0221%18 May
ancient11–130.0018%18 May
nuke13–9-0.0316%15 May
mirage16–12-0.0411%15 May
cache4–13-0.0522%8 May
cache9–13-0.0415%8 May
mirage13–8-0.0111%6 May
ancient6–13-0.0611%6 May
anubis5–130.007%6 May
vertigo5–9-0.174%6 May
inferno6–13-0.0424%6 May
mirage13–9-0.0415%1 May
nuke13–60.0530%1 May
mirage8–13-0.1212%1 May
anubis6–13-0.0514%30 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0018%30 Apr
dust213–20.036%26 Apr
dust210–13-0.039%21 Apr
anubis16–120.0311%20 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0415%20 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0211%15 Apr
overpass15–150.0314%13 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0413%12 Apr
dust213–90.0617%10 Apr
mirage13–70.0411%10 Apr
vertigo10–130.0215%18 Oct
vertigo3–13-0.055%4 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0013%1 Oct
overpass6–13-0.0211%30 Sept
overpass13–60.0621%29 Sept
dust210–130.0613%29 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0212%29 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →