Wyx — CS2 Stats

76561198844445056[U:1:884179328]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,516Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,623Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning50

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–45–6Last 10049%Win rateLWWWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.2

Aggression6.3

Utility5.5

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning5.0

Utility5.5

Mechanics8.4

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time547ms−27ms

first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms

Headshot accuracy30.4%−2.3%

first ⅓ avg 32.7% → last ⅓ avg 30.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 11–6

13–0Biggest win — mirage

9Longest win streak

7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 28dust2Weakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	28	16–12	57%	0.00
inferno	B	23	12–11	52%	-0.00
nuke	C	14	6–8	43%	0.02
dust2	D	12	4–8	33%	0.01
cache	C	9	4–5	44%	0.00
anubis	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.00
ancient	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.00
office	—	3	3–0	100%	0.03
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	0.04
train	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

386Matches

55%Win rate

1.04Avg K/D

73.0ADR

58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	55	64%	1.12	14.4
Dust2	32	62%	1.17	15.2
Anubis	26	65%	1.04	15.3
Inferno	22	55%	0.92	13.3
Ancient	20	40%	0.96	13.4
Nuke	6	33%	0.89	12.3
Cache	6	17%	0.87	16.7
Vertigo	4	25%	0.92	15.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.2%Headshot accuracy

33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.5%Spray accuracy

87.6%Counter-strafing

7.4°Preaim

535msReaction time

34.7%T opening success

47.2%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

8.8%Flash assists

9.48HE damage / grenade

7.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.6873% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	6–13	0.02	27%	30 Aug →
ancient	10–8	-0.01	13%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.02	28%	27 Aug →
dust2	11–6	0.17	26%	27 Aug →
cache	0–9	-0.11	29%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.01	23%	27 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.05	18%	26 Aug →
inferno	5–8	0.00	60%	25 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	29%	24 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.04	36%	24 Aug →
mirage	2–8	-0.01	20%	24 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.07	22%	24 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.00	38%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.03	31%	22 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.00	50%	22 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	17%	21 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.00	18%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.01	29%	19 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.10	32%	19 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	23%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.10	55%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.01	40%	16 Aug →
inferno	3–8	-0.05	20%	15 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.03	36%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	31%	14 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	24%	14 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.02	41%	14 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	43%	12 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.00	35%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	7%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.07	44%	12 Aug →
office	13–7	0.03	26%	12 Aug →
vertigo	1–13	0.05	33%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.01	24%	11 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.03	25%	11 Aug →
inferno	12–12	-0.07	26%	11 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	29%	6 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.08	16%	4 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	32%	4 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.03	27%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	27%	4 Aug →
inferno	10–7	0.03	29%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.07	25%	3 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.06	33%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.07	24%	30 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.02	30%	29 Jul →
office	13–6	0.08	40%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.01	23%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	28%	28 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.11	40%	28 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	33%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	29%	27 Jul →
vertigo	5–13	0.03	44%	26 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	42%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.05	23%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.07	34%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.02	44%	24 Jul →
mirage	9–0	-0.01	36%	24 Jul →
mirage	3–2	-0.04	0%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	35%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	22%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.10	37%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–1	-0.03	50%	24 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	16%	23 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	18%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.05	60%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.02	54%	23 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	25%	23 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.01	38%	23 Jul →
mirage	3–7	-0.11	67%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.11	42%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.06	54%	23 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.03	39%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.10	31%	23 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	28%	22 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	50%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.00	30%	22 Jul →
nuke	5–7	-0.03	54%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.09	43%	22 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.07	24%	22 Jul →
train	0–2	-0.06	0%	22 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	30%	21 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.10	19%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.02	35%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.02	32%	20 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	33%	20 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	48%	20 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.06	47%	20 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	34%	20 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	22%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	23%	18 Jul →
mirage	4–0	0.06	50%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	17%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	24%	17 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	47%	16 Jul →
train	6–13	-0.08	17%	16 Jul →
office	13–10	-0.03	26%	16 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.02	24%	15 Jul →
inferno	2–7	-0.14	0%	14 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	26%	14 Jul →