copey

copey — CS2 Stats

CA76561198836016020[U:1:875750292]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,044Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating30,650Top 1% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersGold band · top ~0.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#216 of 223905 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 30,650 → 30,650
+1Tracked matches · now 4,044
0.0ppWin rate · 70.0% → 70.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 6 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 30,650 +4,600 6 Aug8 Sept · 24 days played
25,75930,650peak 30,6506 Aug8 Sept
30,650Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-08-06

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 30,650
  • +4,485 over 30 days · improving
  • Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
  • Gold band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcopeyFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER30,650 · Gold bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning55
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59392Last 10059%Win rateLWWWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +98ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 20

  • 155 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility4.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.5
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time547ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 550ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 7 Aug
78%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 7 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 27 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 13 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 10nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA33191458%-0.01
dust2S2316770%0.02
infernoA127558%-0.01
ancientS108280%0.04
anubisC83538%0.00
cacheA74357%0.02
nukeD72529%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,442Matches
54%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
73.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19258%1.0014.8
Ancient13753%0.9815.0
Anubis13261%1.0015.3
Inferno8556%1.0514.5
Dust25654%1.0214.8
Vertigo5450%1.1516.9
Overpass1856%1.0916.2
Nuke1030%0.8113.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
7.0°Preaim
554msReaction time
26.3%T opening success
52.6%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
11.7%Flash assists
8.45HE damage / grenade
4.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.3171% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–13-0.0515%30 Aug
dust213–40.0425%29 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0515%28 Aug
inferno13–80.0213%27 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0325%27 Aug
mirage8–20.0125%27 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0325%27 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0511%27 Aug
ancient7–130.0521%27 Aug
anubis13–40.0535%27 Aug
ancient13–70.0325%27 Aug
ancient13–50.0338%27 Aug
inferno8–13-0.1023%27 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0224%27 Aug
dust213–10-0.0215%27 Aug
dust213–30.0320%26 Aug
mirage13–110.0429%26 Aug
mirage0–2-0.070%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0414%26 Aug
mirage13–80.0724%26 Aug
dust213–40.1026%25 Aug
dust213–80.1233%25 Aug
mirage6–130.0218%25 Aug
dust213–110.0622%25 Aug
anubis16–120.0519%25 Aug
cache8–130.0725%25 Aug
ancient13–100.0626%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0427%25 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0631%24 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0033%24 Aug
dust213–110.0513%24 Aug
dust213–110.0927%24 Aug
mirage5–130.0325%24 Aug
nuke13–50.0220%24 Aug
dust216–140.0822%24 Aug
dust213–20.0422%24 Aug
anubis8–13-0.1211%23 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0321%23 Aug
mirage13–90.0221%22 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0221%21 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0012%21 Aug
mirage15–150.0020%20 Aug
cache10–130.0017%20 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0126%20 Aug
nuke9–130.0022%20 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0033%20 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0911%20 Aug
dust213–16-0.0226%19 Aug
mirage13–70.0023%19 Aug
inferno1–5-0.0343%19 Aug
dust28–13-0.0132%18 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0417%18 Aug
mirage0–13-0.1311%18 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0614%18 Aug
dust26–13-0.0526%17 Aug
nuke5–13-0.1024%16 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0026%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0440%16 Aug
dust216–13-0.0120%16 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0123%16 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0112%16 Aug
mirage13–8-0.009%15 Aug
dust213–11-0.0317%15 Aug
dust213–7-0.0118%14 Aug
cache13–30.0423%14 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0218%14 Aug
ancient13–90.0417%14 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0031%14 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0217%14 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0023%14 Aug
cache13–30.0317%14 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0417%14 Aug
nuke16–120.0218%13 Aug
ancient13–70.0314%13 Aug
dust211–13-0.0311%13 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0116%13 Aug
dust24–5-0.0524%13 Aug
ancient13–40.0817%13 Aug
inferno13–50.1024%13 Aug
ancient13–00.1229%13 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0618%13 Aug
dust213–100.0734%13 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0712%12 Aug
inferno13–100.0025%12 Aug
mirage13–60.0418%12 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0216%12 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0020%11 Aug
inferno9–130.0320%11 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0927%10 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0126%10 Aug
dust214–160.0134%8 Aug
cache13–40.0417%8 Aug
dust213–7-0.0116%8 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0230%7 Aug
mirage13–50.0719%7 Aug
anubis13–40.1821%7 Aug
mirage11–130.1625%7 Aug
cache13–3-0.0078%7 Aug
dust211–13-0.0422%7 Aug
dust213–7-0.0332%6 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →