Wasserkopf

Wasserkopf — CS2 Stats

MM76561198828315311[U:1:868049583]Steam profile ↗

1,018Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2861 of 18451 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,605 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWasserkopfFACEITLevel 10 · 1,605 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning50
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56404Last 10056%Win rateWWWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4
Aggression7.4
Utility5.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.0
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time512ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — cache 13–5
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
W4Current streak
125In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 100% over 5dust2Weakest map · 42% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27151256%0.01
dust2C24101442%-0.01
ancientA1911858%-0.00
cacheA106460%0.04
anubisA106460%-0.02
infernoS550100%-0.00
nuke31233%-0.02
overpass220100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

797Matches
52%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
85.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage23058%1.2817.8
Ancient12941%1.1817.1
Dust29647%1.1015.9
Anubis6444%1.1417.3
Cache2767%1.1516.7
Inferno2650%0.9814.6
Overpass1963%1.3018.9
Vertigo1953%1.1017.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
519msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
48.7%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
11.26HE damage / grenade
5.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.9809% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–10-0.0111%27 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0313%27 Aug
cache13–80.0717%27 Aug
mirage13–80.0822%27 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0514%27 Aug
dust213–5-0.0129%27 Aug
inferno13–100.0316%16 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0310%16 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0516%15 Aug
anubis13–110.0214%15 Aug
cache3–13-0.0529%15 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0114%15 Aug
dust213–70.0219%15 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0444%15 Aug
cache13–20.008%15 Aug
dust213–70.0322%15 Aug
dust24–130.0327%14 Aug
dust215–15-0.0414%14 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0414%14 Aug
cache4–13-0.0526%14 Aug
ancient13–4-0.016%14 Aug
inferno13–50.0021%14 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0613%13 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0114%13 Aug
dust216–14-0.0310%13 Aug
mirage13–100.027%13 Aug
anubis13–20.0423%13 Aug
ancient13–4-0.019%13 Aug
ancient8–130.022%12 Aug
dust214–16-0.0313%12 Aug
cache13–160.0220%12 Aug
mirage13–100.028%12 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0933%12 Aug
dust26–13-0.0913%12 Aug
anubis13–20.0127%12 Aug
mirage16–140.0913%11 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0214%11 Aug
ancient13–10.0313%11 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0213%10 Aug
nuke13–60.0035%8 Aug
dust25–13-0.0711%7 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0212%7 Aug
dust213–110.0418%4 Aug
ancient16–140.0414%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.0313%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.0225%1 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0117%31 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0712%31 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0130%31 Jul
dust212–16-0.058%30 Jul
dust27–13-0.076%27 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0224%27 Jul
cache13–90.1412%24 Jul
cache16–120.0115%24 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0217%24 Jul
mirage16–140.0517%23 Jul
dust27–13-0.0012%22 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0010%18 Jul
mirage13–90.0717%18 Jul
mirage14–160.0314%17 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0618%17 Jul
cache5–13-0.0021%17 Jul
mirage2–13-0.088%14 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0224%14 Jul
cache16–140.0625%7 Jul
mirage15–150.0623%6 Jul
ancient13–70.0417%3 Jul
mirage9–130.0220%3 Jul
dust210–13-0.0318%3 Jul
dust213–50.0437%2 Jul
mirage13–100.0318%2 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0412%2 Jul
dust213–4-0.0711%2 Jul
dust23–13-0.0410%1 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0014%1 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0617%30 Jun
overpass16–140.0923%30 Jun
mirage4–130.0026%30 Jun
mirage13–00.0050%30 Jun
mirage0–7-0.030%30 Jun
mirage13–70.1228%29 Jun
mirage13–60.1018%29 Jun
dust213–30.0818%29 Jun
mirage13–60.0229%29 Jun
overpass13–80.0819%29 Jun
ancient13–80.0719%29 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0114%29 Jun
dust210–13-0.0121%29 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0212%29 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0017%28 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0215%28 Jun
mirage9–13-0.1010%24 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0314%24 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0115%24 Jun
cache13–50.1822%24 Jun
mirage13–100.0534%24 Jun
dust210–130.0216%23 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0312%23 Jun
ancient13–60.0510%23 Jun
dust25–13-0.0121%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →