Pablo

Pablo — CS2 Stats

TD76561198813772287[U:1:853506559]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,096Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,010 → 2,010
+1Tracked matches · now 2,096
0.0ppWin rate · 34.5% → 34.5%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 17 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,353 +3,057 17 Mar9 Jun · 22 days played
23,29627,043peak 27,04317 Mar9 Jun
27,166Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,010Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-03-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,010
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 490 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPabloPEAK ELO2,010csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning58
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateLWLWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.2
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.8
Utility6.2
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time606ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 8 Apr
80%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 12 Apr
461msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · anubis, 9 May
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 8 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 61% over 18nukeWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26141254%0.03
dust2B24111346%0.02
ancientA1811761%0.03
nukeD102820%0.00
anubisB84450%0.02
overpassA53260%0.04
inferno43175%0.04
cache42250%-0.01
poseidon110100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,348Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
82.3ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient26956%1.1716.6
Anubis20953%1.0815.8
Mirage19345%1.1416.1
Vertigo8147%1.0615.6
Dust27348%1.1816.9
Inferno7154%1.1216.1
Nuke5941%1.0616.9
Overpass1844%1.0614.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
87.5%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
602msReaction time
37.2%T opening success
55.0%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
13.6%Flash assists
6.10HE damage / grenade
12.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2388% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage14–160.0519%11 Aug
anubis13–20.1426%7 Aug
nuke4–13-0.049%27 Jul
dust213–110.0312%27 Jul
dust211–130.0433%15 Jul
dust213–7-0.0115%15 Jul
dust27–13-0.0620%15 Jul
mirage9–130.0342%9 Jun
dust213–4-0.0213%8 Jun
dust213–110.0328%7 Jun
dust29–13-0.0318%5 Jun
mirage13–90.0320%2 Jun
mirage7–130.0822%2 Jun
mirage10–130.0220%1 Jun
dust22–13-0.0419%31 May
nuke9–130.0726%31 May
mirage9–130.0417%31 May
ancient4–130.0526%31 May
mirage4–130.0026%31 May
ancient13–60.0715%21 May
ancient16–120.0320%19 May
dust25–13-0.0636%19 May
dust211–130.0510%19 May
mirage10–13-0.026%15 May
nuke13–9-0.0120%14 May
dust210–13-0.0420%14 May
inferno9–6-0.0038%12 May
poseidon9–50.1211%12 May
ancient15–150.0138%12 May
anubis13–5-0.0129%9 May
inferno9–70.0614%7 May
cache11–13-0.047%6 May
anubis9–13-0.048%5 May
anubis9–13-0.0810%3 May
mirage13–110.0220%3 May
dust213–100.0640%2 May
ancient13–110.0314%2 May
mirage16–140.0713%2 May
ancient13–6-0.0319%2 May
cache13–70.0021%2 May
cache6–130.0221%2 May
dust25–130.0232%29 Apr
cache25–22-0.0017%29 Apr
mirage13–30.0111%23 Apr
ancient11–130.0519%23 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0012%22 Apr
mirage13–80.0418%21 Apr
ancient13–50.1025%21 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0116%21 Apr
anubis9–130.0027%21 Apr
nuke10–130.0311%20 Apr
ancient13–80.0014%20 Apr
dust213–80.0815%20 Apr
dust213–70.0218%20 Apr
dust28–130.0115%18 Apr
mirage13–40.0425%18 Apr
mirage13–70.0021%15 Apr
dust211–130.0216%15 Apr
dust27–13-0.0123%15 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0123%15 Apr
ancient10–130.0618%15 Apr
ancient13–90.0018%15 Apr
dust26–13-0.0513%14 Apr
inferno13–60.0780%12 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0217%11 Apr
dust213–60.1421%11 Apr
ancient13–40.0714%11 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0221%10 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0523%10 Apr
ancient13–70.0827%10 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0514%10 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0411%9 Apr
mirage9–130.0114%8 Apr
mirage6–130.0117%8 Apr
dust213–10.1721%8 Apr
mirage13–90.0618%5 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0411%4 Apr
anubis13–80.0217%4 Apr
ancient13–100.0830%4 Apr
nuke13–70.0327%2 Apr
dust210–130.0524%2 Apr
anubis10–130.017%2 Apr
mirage6–130.0628%2 Apr
overpass6–130.0326%1 Apr
overpass13–90.1018%31 Mar
mirage13–50.0719%30 Mar
anubis13–100.1017%30 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0321%30 Mar
mirage13–100.0723%30 Mar
overpass16–140.0126%21 Mar
dust213–4-0.0211%21 Mar
dust212–10.0317%21 Mar
inferno9–130.0511%21 Mar
mirage13–80.0322%20 Mar
nuke7–130.0223%19 Mar
mirage15–150.0221%19 Mar
nuke14–160.0420%18 Mar
mirage13–10.1055%18 Mar
overpass13–70.1020%17 Mar
mirage13–70.0826%17 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →