CurryChicken

CurryChicken — CS2 Stats

CF76561198811993595[U:1:851727867]Steam profile ↗

1,640Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,322Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4002 of 21916 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,597 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCurryChickenFACEITLevel 8 · 1,597 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,322 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning54
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49456Last 10049%Win rateLLLLWTWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7
Aggression7.7
Utility3.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.4
Utility3.9
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time587ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — mirage 6–1
131Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 12nukeWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B25121348%0.01
mirageB20101050%-0.01
nukeC167944%-0.01
cacheB168850%-0.01
anubisA127558%0.01
ancientB84450%-0.00
inferno2020%-0.01
overpass110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

391Matches
51%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
76.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis10157%0.9914.7
Vertigo6256%0.9814.2
Inferno4740%0.9714.2
Dust24547%1.1916.5
Ancient4439%0.9514.0
Mirage4455%0.8714.3
Nuke2941%0.9715.1
Overpass1669%1.2814.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
572msReaction time
32.6%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
8.58HE damage / grenade
6.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4214 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.6001% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–13-0.0320%27 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0321%26 Aug
anubis7–130.0110%26 Aug
cache5–13-0.079%26 Aug
mirage16–140.0012%25 Aug
dust215–15-0.0014%25 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0115%22 Aug
dust28–13-0.0028%22 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0619%21 Aug
dust213–40.0021%21 Aug
cache10–130.0834%21 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0517%21 Aug
cache13–70.0221%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0727%20 Aug
dust213–10.0929%20 Aug
cache13–5-0.0019%20 Aug
nuke7–130.0026%20 Aug
mirage6–10.2242%20 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0423%20 Aug
dust213–9-0.0327%20 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0524%18 Aug
dust213–90.0734%18 Aug
dust213–80.0325%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0224%13 Aug
ancient15–150.0120%13 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0133%13 Aug
dust216–130.0418%9 Aug
cache1–12-0.047%8 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0317%8 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0117%6 Aug
nuke13–70.007%6 Aug
cache13–110.0216%5 Aug
dust28–13-0.0214%5 Aug
cache13–8-0.0219%5 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0313%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.0913%4 Aug
nuke9–130.0119%4 Aug
dust214–16-0.009%4 Aug
anubis13–60.0817%4 Aug
cache13–8-0.0311%1 Aug
nuke11–130.0114%31 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0526%30 Jul
dust216–14-0.0117%30 Jul
anubis13–80.0321%29 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0326%28 Jul
mirage10–3-0.0640%28 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0315%27 Jul
anubis13–110.0726%27 Jul
nuke16–130.0415%27 Jul
cache8–13-0.0417%25 Jul
nuke13–50.0018%25 Jul
ancient11–130.0214%25 Jul
dust25–13-0.0716%24 Jul
cache13–11-0.0220%24 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0215%22 Jul
dust213–110.0224%22 Jul
ancient13–110.0314%22 Jul
dust213–50.0330%22 Jul
mirage13–100.0120%18 Jul
nuke13–100.0327%17 Jul
nuke13–50.0426%17 Jul
dust214–16-0.0214%17 Jul
dust215–15-0.0233%17 Jul
anubis13–70.0023%17 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0615%16 Jul
cache11–13-0.0318%16 Jul
dust210–130.0324%15 Jul
cache13–80.0218%15 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0617%15 Jul
cache13–110.1224%15 Jul
dust29–13-0.0621%15 Jul
anubis13–100.0721%9 Jul
cache12–12-0.0525%7 Jul
anubis13–100.0115%6 Jul
anubis13–60.0227%5 Jul
dust28–13-0.0317%5 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0527%5 Jul
overpass13–80.0420%4 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0318%3 Jul
nuke13–50.0127%1 Jul
ancient13–30.0420%1 Jul
mirage13–100.0139%1 Jul
dust213–160.0328%1 Jul
dust210–130.0838%1 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0220%1 Jul
ancient15–150.0213%30 Jun
inferno7–130.0122%29 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0523%29 Jun
dust213–30.1418%24 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0117%24 Jun
anubis7–13-0.079%24 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0518%23 Jun
dust213–20.0823%23 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0121%23 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0213%22 Jun
dust216–14-0.0611%15 Jun
mirage11–13-0.058%12 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0924%12 Jun
cache7–13-0.0722%12 Jun
cache4–130.0315%12 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →