farki𑣲

farki𑣲 — CS2 Stats

76561198811556714[U:1:851290986]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

708Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,623 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 27 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,708 +1,001 29 Jan17 Apr · 32 days played
15,70719,467peak 19,46729 Jan17 Apr
19,569Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,623Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-01-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,623
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 128 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfarki𑣲FACEITLevel 8 · 1,623 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,623csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning56
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateLLLLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +6.8pp headshot accuracy · −100ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility3.9
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.0

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 48% on T to 33% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.6
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time609ms+0ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 26 Feb
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 9 Feb
430msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · mirage, 21 Feb
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 26 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
L4Current streak
410In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 45dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA45281762%0.00
nukeC2081240%-0.01
anubisA138562%0.02
ancientD82625%-0.02
dust2D51420%0.00
infernoA53260%-0.00
cache31233%-0.04
overpass1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

709Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
83.4ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26362%1.0916.8
Dust29443%1.0916.7
Nuke9449%1.0517.8
Anubis2839%0.9915.5
Inferno2425%0.9117.0
Ancient2035%0.9415.8
Vertigo1839%1.0619.4
Overpass1540%0.8314.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
612msReaction time
48.3%T opening success
32.8%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
9.25HE damage / grenade
3.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.3875 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.8133% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.0519%16 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0020%14 Sept
nuke10–130.0417%13 Sept
nuke9–130.0231%9 Sept
mirage13–60.0924%5 Sept
ancient13–70.0512%5 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0214%5 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0317%3 Aug
nuke13–40.0127%3 Aug
mirage13–50.0115%14 Jul
anubis13–70.0716%2 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0610%2 Jun
cache13–8-0.0918%22 May
mirage13–40.0814%22 May
mirage13–5-0.0316%22 May
overpass7–13-0.0911%14 May
cache11–130.039%14 May
mirage13–70.018%14 May
ancient13–160.0213%28 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0310%21 Apr
dust211–13-0.0213%17 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0219%17 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0817%8 Apr
dust211–13-0.0224%8 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0517%6 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0724%6 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0215%5 Apr
mirage11–130.0122%29 Mar
mirage0–13-0.0110%26 Mar
inferno10–30.0115%26 Mar
ancient13–16-0.0415%22 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0229%22 Mar
dust29–130.0119%20 Mar
anubis13–90.0217%13 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0133%13 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0039%13 Mar
nuke13–80.0222%12 Mar
mirage13–100.0221%12 Mar
mirage16–130.0129%4 Mar
mirage6–130.0732%3 Mar
nuke3–11-0.0418%28 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0819%27 Feb
mirage13–10.0121%26 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0421%26 Feb
anubis13–40.2126%26 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0223%24 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0613%23 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0227%21 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0316%21 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0413%21 Feb
mirage13–80.0426%21 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0521%19 Feb
mirage13–40.0719%19 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0114%19 Feb
nuke13–90.0017%17 Feb
mirage16–140.0327%17 Feb
mirage12–160.0017%16 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0020%16 Feb
mirage13–50.0014%14 Feb
anubis13–100.0221%14 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0512%13 Feb
mirage15–15-0.0016%12 Feb
nuke11–5-0.019%12 Feb
mirage13–3-0.0222%12 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0221%11 Feb
mirage15–150.0220%10 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0332%10 Feb
mirage13–1-0.0220%10 Feb
mirage9–130.0618%9 Feb
dust213–40.0142%9 Feb
anubis13–100.0617%9 Feb
anubis13–2-0.0010%9 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0216%8 Feb
nuke13–90.0122%8 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0518%8 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0422%7 Feb
dust27–130.0118%7 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0432%7 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0319%7 Feb
mirage13–60.0327%7 Feb
nuke9–130.0322%4 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0325%2 Feb
mirage16–130.0119%2 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0616%1 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0317%1 Feb
mirage13–110.0626%1 Feb
inferno6–130.0211%31 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0216%31 Jan
mirage13–80.0517%31 Jan
anubis11–130.0315%30 Jan
mirage13–100.0316%30 Jan
anubis5–130.0015%30 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0027%30 Jan
nuke13–90.0119%30 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0219%29 Jan
inferno13–80.0222%29 Jan
mirage13–60.1312%28 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0529%28 Jan
mirage13–70.0214%28 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0412%27 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →