RiNeZ

RiNeZ — CS2 Stats

76561198798903655[U:1:838637927]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

306Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 62 days played since 24 Dec 2022. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,926 +7,927 12 Jan7 Apr · 13 days played
9,99919,268peak 19,26812 Jan7 Apr
19,268Peak Premier in tracked matches
62Days played since 2022-12-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRiNeZFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning58
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54442Last 10054%Win rateWWLLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 669ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility2.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch7.0

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.8
Utility2.4
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time626ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 10 Jan
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 11 Mar
453msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · anubis, 3 Jan
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 11 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
31Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB34181653%0.06
ancientB136746%0.05
dust2B126650%0.02
nukeS97278%0.05
anubisC83538%0.02
infernoA85363%0.04
vertigoB63350%0.03
overpass43175%0.08
train31233%-0.01
cache21150%0.10
basalt110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

225Matches
57%Win rate
1.44Avg K/D
90.2ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

55%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5374%1.4119.2
Ancient2133%1.1617.9
Anubis2065%1.4419.7
Dust21828%1.1120.7
Vertigo1369%1.5519.8
Nuke1242%1.2417.8
Inferno944%1.2816.6
Train425%1.4021.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
29.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
608msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
40.9%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
9.72HE damage / grenade
10.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0485% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.1231%23 Jun
dust213–50.1426%23 Jun
nuke6–9-0.0536%24 Dec
ancient9–13-0.0122%24 Aug
mirage11–13-0.037%7 Apr
mirage13–110.0522%7 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0326%7 Apr
mirage13–50.1212%6 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0138%5 Apr
vertigo13–110.0621%5 Apr
basalt13–50.0824%4 Apr
anubis2–13-0.0621%4 Apr
mirage12–120.0514%2 Apr
dust29–13-0.0716%30 Mar
anubis13–60.0015%30 Mar
dust25–13-0.0328%30 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0526%28 Mar
train10–13-0.0534%26 Mar
dust211–13-0.0017%26 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0131%23 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0319%19 Mar
ancient11–13-0.048%16 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0020%14 Mar
dust213–10.0152%11 Mar
ancient13–20.1029%7 Mar
mirage4–130.0923%28 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0321%23 Feb
mirage13–40.1339%17 Feb
ancient6–130.0619%15 Feb
anubis13–110.0223%15 Feb
dust210–130.0323%15 Feb
mirage9–130.1138%15 Feb
dust213–80.0820%5 Feb
mirage13–90.1433%4 Feb
dust28–130.0516%30 Jan
ancient13–20.1020%30 Jan
mirage10–130.0512%29 Jan
ancient7–130.0931%29 Jan
dust213–90.0827%29 Jan
nuke13–40.1626%29 Jan
mirage10–130.0737%29 Jan
ancient8–130.0118%24 Jan
anubis5–13-0.0330%24 Jan
dust212–90.0033%24 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0224%22 Jan
mirage13–90.1231%20 Jan
ancient13–30.1319%18 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0027%18 Jan
mirage13–80.1225%15 Jan
nuke16–120.0535%12 Jan
ancient13–20.2432%10 Jan
anubis11–130.0528%3 Jan
nuke13–40.1841%30 Dec
dust28–13-0.0524%23 Dec
anubis16–120.1219%16 Dec
dust216–140.0521%16 Dec
mirage13–9-0.0013%16 Dec
anubis16–190.0518%15 Dec
vertigo5–13-0.098%11 Dec
nuke13–110.0924%9 Dec
nuke13–40.0519%2 Dec
train4–130.0431%1 Dec
mirage13–30.0329%18 Nov
train13–5-0.0131%16 Nov
mirage16–130.0217%9 Feb
mirage9–160.0121%26 Jan
inferno16–6-0.049%20 Jan
mirage7–90.0426%19 Jan
mirage9–00.1519%17 Jan
mirage7–90.036%14 Jan
inferno14–16-0.0222%13 Jan
inferno16–50.1215%13 Jan
overpass8–160.027%12 Jan
nuke16–120.0322%12 Jan
mirage16–110.0619%11 Jan
mirage16–12-0.0225%8 Jan
mirage8–160.0420%8 Jan
mirage9–50.0921%8 Jan
overpass16–130.0411%7 Jan
inferno12–160.0520%7 Jan
mirage10–160.0018%4 Jan
mirage16–80.0623%4 Jan
mirage7–00.1524%4 Jan
cache16–70.1117%4 Jan
vertigo8–16-0.0320%4 Jan
overpass16–40.0816%3 Jan
overpass16–50.1725%3 Jan
mirage16–80.1918%3 Jan
inferno16–80.0726%3 Jan
mirage8–80.0612%31 Dec
mirage8–160.0127%28 Dec
ancient16–50.0721%27 Dec
inferno16–130.0818%26 Dec
vertigo10–30.1219%26 Dec
mirage16–90.0425%26 Dec
vertigo14–16-0.0018%25 Dec
vertigo9–70.1221%25 Dec
inferno13–160.1016%24 Dec
cache6–90.1040%24 Dec
mirage3–90.0639%24 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →