fih flavored lasagna

fih flavored lasagna — CS2 Stats

UZ76561198798653546[U:1:838387818]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

637Tracked matches32%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,454Purple band · top ~18.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 17,454 → 17,454
+5Tracked matches · now 637
−5.8ppWin rate · 37.9% → 32.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 14 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,454 +0 18 Aug4 Sept · 5 days played
17,45417,454peak 17,45418 Aug4 Sept
17,558Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-07-14

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 17,454
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,546 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfih flavored lasagnaFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER17,454 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning43
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50446Last 10050%Win rateTLWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · +112ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 725ms

Last 10

  • 181 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Last 20

  • 5132 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.2
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time620ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–6 · nuke, 1 Aug
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · mirage, 1 Aug
453msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · office, 24 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 22 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 21ancientWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2114767%0.01
nukeB157847%-0.00
anubisB147750%0.01
dust2A116555%-0.00
ancientB115645%0.03
officeA74357%-0.00
trainA53260%0.01
poseidon4040%-0.04
vertigo41325%-0.00
cache31233%-0.02
inferno31233%-0.00
fachwerk1010%0.01
italy110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
608msReaction time
32.9%T opening success
37.7%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
13.70HE damage / grenade
5.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.9324% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–12-0.0710%18 Sept
mirage5–130.0517%18 Sept
anubis13–80.0721%17 Sept
dust27–13-0.0531%17 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0114%7 Sept
mirage5–13-0.124%2 Sept
poseidon7–9-0.1421%2 Sept
poseidon7–9-0.0216%2 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0316%31 Aug
dust27–13-0.0713%31 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0316%30 Aug
mirage4–13-0.090%28 Aug
dust213–10-0.0127%28 Aug
vertigo11–130.0518%28 Aug
dust213–30.0210%27 Aug
office5–13-0.059%24 Aug
mirage13–20.0319%24 Aug
dust26–130.0220%24 Aug
ancient12–120.0115%24 Aug
dust29–13-0.037%20 Aug
ancient11–130.1321%19 Aug
nuke4–9-0.1118%19 Aug
ancient4–130.0521%18 Aug
nuke9–130.1019%18 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0413%18 Aug
cache13–8-0.0122%18 Aug
nuke13–5-0.054%18 Aug
anubis2–13-0.039%17 Aug
office13–11-0.0111%17 Aug
cache7–13-0.0219%17 Aug
train3–13-0.074%16 Aug
mirage13–70.0415%16 Aug
cache7–13-0.0416%9 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0410%9 Aug
nuke4–13-0.016%9 Aug
anubis13–70.0714%9 Aug
ancient9–10.1116%9 Aug
dust213–70.0614%9 Aug
vertigo5–90.0613%9 Aug
mirage13–60.008%9 Aug
mirage13–30.0016%9 Aug
nuke9–6-0.012%9 Aug
ancient13–60.026%6 Aug
mirage6–10.0429%6 Aug
train13–80.0317%6 Aug
nuke9–130.0215%5 Aug
mirage13–110.0516%5 Aug
mirage13–30.087%5 Aug
train11–13-0.0212%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0210%4 Aug
anubis4–130.0112%4 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0715%1 Aug
office11–13-0.0319%1 Aug
ancient13–50.0328%1 Aug
mirage13–80.0641%1 Aug
anubis13–60.018%1 Aug
dust24–10.1221%1 Aug
inferno9–70.0623%1 Aug
nuke9–60.1927%1 Aug
poseidon2–9-0.0428%1 Aug
dust213–90.0117%1 Aug
anubis13–40.0917%31 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0319%28 Jul
vertigo8–13-0.113%28 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0620%28 Jul
mirage13–70.0431%28 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0210%27 Jul
mirage5–130.0019%27 Jul
anubis12–120.059%27 Jul
inferno4–13-0.015%27 Jul
mirage13–80.0010%27 Jul
anubis13–50.007%27 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0018%27 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0115%27 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0419%24 Jul
fachwerk6–130.0111%24 Jul
office4–13-0.0213%24 Jul
dust213–11-0.0114%23 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0412%23 Jul
italy11–30.004%23 Jul
vertigo13–8-0.0115%23 Jul
anubis13–110.0614%22 Jul
mirage13–0-0.018%22 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0210%22 Jul
office13–70.0630%21 Jul
ancient13–80.0422%21 Jul
ancient13–30.0815%21 Jul
office13–40.049%21 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0714%21 Jul
poseidon8–80.0211%21 Jul
train13–50.0827%19 Jul
nuke13–50.0322%19 Jul
anubis13–100.019%19 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0321%17 Jul
ancient8–13-0.064%17 Jul
mirage13–110.0315%17 Jul
nuke13–70.0220%16 Jul
train13–90.0514%14 Jul
office13–11-0.0212%14 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0614%14 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →