OmarB

OmarB — CS2 Stats

SA76561198785082749[U:1:824817021]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

347Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,675Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating24,034Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32737 of 261507 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (64 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,034 → 24,034
+1Tracked matches · now 347
0.0ppWin rate · 40.0% → 40.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,034 +6,511 3 Jul – 11 Sept · 10 days played
17,52324,034peak 24,0343 Jul11 Sept
24,034Peak Premier in tracked matches
48Days played since 2026-07-03

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,034
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 966 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.8%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy17.1%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.081.061.07meets
Match win rate46.2%46.3%46.9%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOmarBFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,034 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning54
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateLLLWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +68ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.8
Utility4.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time637ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–13 · dust2, 17 Jul →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · dust2, 23 Jul →
469msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · dust2, 6 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 9 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 56% over 9mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B8237–4545%0.01
cacheA95–456%0.00
mirageD51–420%-0.01
inferno—44–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

88,362Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,457Matches
46.2%Match win rate
51.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
12,205MVPs
1,675Hours (in match)
2,990Bombs planted
2,576Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,202
AWP9,583
FAMAS1,407
MP71,403
P2501,038
Knife939

Lifetime map wins

16,560dust2
4,550inferno
2,030train
1,643cbble
551nuke
302vertigo
16office
9lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

463Matches
56%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
81.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust27865%1.2718.2
Inferno3139%0.9615.0
Mirage3053%0.9816.0
Cache1662%1.0917.6
Nuke1362%1.0616.1
Ancient367%0.7313.0
Overpass250%1.2015.0
Anubis1100%1.2922.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.2%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
90.6%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
621msReaction time
33.8%T opening success
55.6%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
6.57HE damage / grenade
8.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.8223% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.0423%9 Sept →
dust25–130.0124%8 Sept →
dust211–130.0240%6 Sept →
dust213–10.0731%5 Sept →
dust24–13-0.056%4 Sept →
dust212–8-0.0320%4 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0026%30 Aug →
dust213–40.0620%30 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0527%29 Aug →
cache13–110.0527%29 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0419%29 Aug →
dust213–80.0318%28 Aug →
dust23–130.0225%28 Aug →
dust213–90.1135%27 Aug →
dust28–1-0.0523%27 Aug →
dust213–110.0317%26 Aug →
dust24–130.0328%21 Aug →
dust211–130.0041%20 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0436%19 Aug →
dust22–13-0.089%16 Aug →
dust27–130.0723%15 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0226%15 Aug →
dust211–130.0217%15 Aug →
dust213–10.0814%14 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0617%14 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0119%12 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0329%11 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0221%10 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0414%9 Aug →
dust213–50.0541%9 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0919%9 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0219%9 Aug →
inferno13–60.0012%8 Aug →
mirage10–130.0120%7 Aug →
dust210–20.0720%7 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0310%6 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0621%6 Aug →
dust213–110.0723%3 Aug →
dust28–130.0322%3 Aug →
dust213–40.0718%3 Aug →
dust23–00.0033%3 Aug →
mirage9–130.0424%1 Aug →
dust216–140.0116%1 Aug →
dust213–50.0335%1 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0529%31 Jul →
dust213–100.0818%31 Jul →
dust211–130.0027%31 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0218%31 Jul →
dust213–50.0126%31 Jul →
dust213–90.1120%31 Jul →
dust213–90.0414%31 Jul →
dust213–80.0419%30 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0515%29 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0223%29 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0626%27 Jul →
dust212–120.0323%27 Jul →
dust210–130.0129%27 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0128%27 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0328%25 Jul →
dust23–130.0236%25 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0429%25 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0429%25 Jul →
dust213–70.0233%23 Jul →
dust213–80.0243%23 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0331%22 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0736%21 Jul →
dust213–70.0932%21 Jul →
dust213–100.0122%21 Jul →
dust213–70.0131%21 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0323%20 Jul →
dust29–130.0519%19 Jul →
dust23–130.0141%18 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0130%17 Jul →
dust29–130.1525%17 Jul →
dust211–130.0316%15 Jul →
dust212–120.0429%14 Jul →
dust213–30.0227%11 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0133%11 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0115%11 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0233%11 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0025%10 Jul →
cache13–30.0414%10 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0821%10 Jul →
dust213–30.0522%10 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0212%10 Jul →
cache13–40.0125%9 Jul →
dust213–00.1238%9 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0216%8 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0520%8 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0224%7 Jul →
cache13–40.0523%7 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0432%7 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0423%6 Jul →
dust211–130.0120%5 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0822%5 Jul →
dust211–130.0139%4 Jul →
inferno16–14-0.0523%3 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0218%3 Jul →
mirage13–90.0218%3 Jul →
inferno13–60.0316%3 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.