.

. — CS2 Stats

76561198764064287[U:1:803798559]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

545Tracked matches43%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning52
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–48Last 10052%Win rateLWLWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −5.6pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility4.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.9

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.2
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time528ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy29.5%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 26.8% → last ⅓ avg 29.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 7–13 · mirage, 13 Oct →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · vertigo, 13 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 12–2 · mirage, 14 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 5ancientWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB4019–2148%0.02
vertigoS2013–765%0.01
dust2B137–654%0.01
anubisC94–544%0.02
ancientC73–443%0.00
cacheS55–0100%0.01
inferno—30–30%-0.04
nuke—21–150%0.01
overpass—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.7%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.8%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
526msReaction time
37.1%T opening success
48.1%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
11.54HE damage / grenade
3.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.8522 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.1069% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0528%17 Oct →
cache13–90.0035%17 Oct →
mirage7–130.0625%17 Oct →
vertigo13–6-0.0026%17 Oct →
mirage11–130.0121%17 Oct →
mirage10–130.0024%17 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0328%17 Oct →
vertigo10–130.0633%17 Oct →
dust213–60.0333%17 Oct →
mirage13–80.0126%17 Oct →
dust25–130.0336%17 Oct →
mirage14–160.0334%17 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0519%17 Oct →
vertigo13–110.0332%16 Oct →
ancient7–130.0245%16 Oct →
mirage7–130.0234%16 Oct →
vertigo13–7-0.0516%16 Oct →
nuke10–130.0245%16 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0635%16 Oct →
vertigo13–40.0839%16 Oct →
ancient13–80.0531%16 Oct →
vertigo13–11-0.0321%16 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0031%16 Oct →
anubis13–90.0744%16 Oct →
anubis7–130.0741%16 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0216%16 Oct →
mirage8–130.0128%16 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0130%16 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0226%16 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0114%15 Oct →
mirage8–130.0718%15 Oct →
anubis11–130.0129%15 Oct →
mirage13–100.0830%15 Oct →
cache13–110.0144%15 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0519%15 Oct →
mirage13–20.1132%14 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0136%14 Oct →
vertigo13–30.0239%14 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0036%14 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0433%14 Oct →
anubis13–60.0434%14 Oct →
anubis11–130.0119%14 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0529%14 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0229%14 Oct →
mirage0–9-0.0745%14 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0728%14 Oct →
vertigo13–11-0.0516%14 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0030%14 Oct →
vertigo13–100.0436%14 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0035%14 Oct →
ancient13–100.0334%14 Oct →
dust213–100.0736%14 Oct →
mirage12–20.0542%14 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0633%14 Oct →
vertigo14–160.0428%14 Oct →
vertigo13–9-0.0220%13 Oct →
mirage10–130.0722%13 Oct →
mirage7–130.1442%13 Oct →
dust213–80.0636%13 Oct →
mirage13–60.0134%13 Oct →
vertigo8–130.0335%13 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0135%13 Oct →
mirage13–40.0913%13 Oct →
anubis13–60.1336%13 Oct →
vertigo13–11-0.0254%13 Oct →
dust217–19-0.0128%13 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0033%13 Oct →
mirage13–60.1230%13 Oct →
vertigo13–40.0230%13 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0424%13 Oct →
cache13–80.0625%13 Oct →
mirage14–160.0533%13 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0228%13 Oct →
vertigo6–130.0236%12 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0524%12 Oct →
mirage13–100.0235%12 Oct →
inferno14–160.0131%12 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0619%12 Oct →
mirage19–160.0223%12 Oct →
overpass7–13-0.0228%12 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0033%12 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0329%12 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0125%12 Oct →
mirage13–100.0228%12 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0422%12 Oct →
dust213–30.0216%12 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0526%12 Oct →
mirage16–130.0024%12 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0328%12 Oct →
ancient13–80.0825%12 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0424%12 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0131%12 Oct →
cache13–80.0126%12 Oct →
mirage13–50.0922%11 Oct →
dust211–10.0532%11 Oct →
vertigo13–90.0720%11 Oct →
mirage13–00.1034%11 Oct →
vertigo19–15-0.0129%11 Oct →
vertigo8–13-0.0223%11 Oct →
mirage13–80.0521%11 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.