k1ll- — CS2 Stats
AF76561198690961839[U:1:730696111]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction
Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 2–3 · 40% win rate
- Avg rating 0.06
- Avg headshot accuracy 16%
- Avg reaction 423ms
Last 10
- 7–3 · 70% win rate
- Avg rating 0.05
- Avg headshot accuracy 18%
- Avg reaction 457ms
Last 20
- 14–6 · 70% win rate
- Avg rating 0.03
- Avg headshot accuracy 18%
- Avg reaction 471ms
Newest first, from the last 22 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like m0NESY 95% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.4/10 (Strong, provisional — under 30 tracked matches), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 22 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 22 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
Strongest and weakest map need 5+ matches on two different maps — 1 of 7 maps qualify so far.
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 ancient | A | 7 | 4–3 | 57% | 0.05 |
 mirage | — | 4 | 3–1 | 75% | 0.03 |
 inferno | — | 4 | 3–1 | 75% | 0.02 |
 overpass | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | 0.02 |
 dust2 | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | 0.04 |
 anubis | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | 0.05 |
 nuke | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.02 |
Across the last 22 tracked matches.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient | 7 | 57% | 1.76 | 19.6 |
| Mirage | 6 | 83% | 1.73 | 18.8 |
| Inferno | 6 | 67% | 1.41 | 16.5 |
| Dust2 | 2 | 100% | 1.26 | 20.5 |
| Overpass | 2 | 0% | 1.21 | 19.0 |
| Anubis | 2 | 100% | 1.88 | 16.0 |
| Nuke | 1 | 100% | 1.00 | 14.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.3515% — below the 40% mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ancient | 10–13 | 0.03 | 22% | 17 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.13 | 18% | 17 Jun → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 17 Jun → | |
| inferno | 13–9 | 0.06 | 18% | 17 Jun → | |
| overpass | 10–13 | 0.05 | 9% | 17 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–8 | 0.10 | 22% | 17 Jun → | |
| inferno | 13–7 | 0.05 | 28% | 15 Jun → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | 0.02 | 12% | 15 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 16–14 | -0.03 | 12% | 15 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–2 | 0.05 | 28% | 15 Jun → | |
| anubis | 13–6 | -0.01 | 9% | 14 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.00 | 24% | 14 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | -0.02 | 14% | 14 Jun → | |
| inferno | 10–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 14 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–8 | 0.10 | 17% | 14 Jun → | |
| overpass | 11–13 | -0.01 | 11% | 13 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 13–9 | 0.10 | 23% | 13 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | 0.09 | 13% | 13 Jun → | |
| inferno | 13–5 | -0.01 | 22% | 12 Jun → | |
| ancient | 1–13 | -0.01 | 17% | 12 Jun → | |
| anubis | 13–6 | 0.11 | 26% | 12 Jun → | |
| ancient | 4–13 | -0.02 | 18% | 10 Jun → |
Match data via Leetify.
Recent teammates
This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.