Fatboy.Cones

Fatboy.Cones — CS2 Stats

SY76561198452751867[U:1:492486139]Steam profile ↗

501Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 Developing
Premier CS Rating19,662Purple band · top ~9.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10681 of 23702 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFatboy.ConesFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,662 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning42
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53443Last 10053%Win rateLWLLTLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9
Aggression4.7
Utility3.9
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch5.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.2
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time617ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 690ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — nuke 13–0
130Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
124In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 82% over 11infernoWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB21111052%0.03
mirageA2012860%0.01
dust2B157847%0.03
infernoD1331023%-0.03
ancientS119282%0.02
cacheA116555%0.02
anubisA74357%-0.01
vertigo21150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

52Matches
60%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
78.8ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

49%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1540%1.2015.3
Ancient1362%1.3315.4
Nuke967%0.9815.2
Anubis475%1.3617.8
Cache450%1.1417.5
Dust24100%1.2013.5
Inferno367%0.9012.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
620msReaction time
25.0%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
6.70HE damage / grenade
5.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.9684% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–13-0.0635%28 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0426%28 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0515%28 Aug
inferno3–9-0.146%27 Aug
vertigo8–8-0.0314%27 Aug
nuke5–90.0115%27 Aug
inferno4–130.0029%27 Aug
ancient13–50.1325%27 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0431%27 Aug
cache13–60.0819%27 Aug
dust29–130.0216%26 Aug
inferno6–90.1114%26 Aug
dust26–13-0.0010%26 Aug
inferno6–13-0.064%26 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0810%25 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0114%25 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0214%25 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0626%24 Aug
dust213–60.1019%24 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0114%24 Aug
mirage9–13-0.1013%23 Aug
dust211–130.0213%23 Aug
ancient4–130.0629%23 Aug
mirage13–100.0529%23 Aug
vertigo13–60.0921%23 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0017%23 Aug
mirage13–100.0015%23 Aug
inferno9–130.1022%23 Aug
nuke10–130.1220%23 Aug
inferno11–13-0.1040%23 Aug
mirage13–100.019%23 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0115%22 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0117%22 Aug
cache13–50.0319%22 Aug
nuke13–30.0340%22 Aug
dust22–13-0.0312%21 Aug
dust213–60.0129%21 Aug
nuke13–110.0719%20 Aug
ancient13–70.0913%20 Aug
nuke13–40.0325%20 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0111%20 Aug
dust26–130.0242%19 Aug
mirage13–40.1823%19 Aug
cache12–120.1019%18 Aug
ancient13–110.0216%18 Aug
nuke13–00.2339%18 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0315%18 Aug
nuke13–160.0627%18 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0929%16 Aug
mirage13–1-0.0210%16 Aug
nuke8–80.0425%16 Aug
nuke2–9-0.119%16 Aug
dust29–13-0.076%15 Aug
mirage16–140.0016%15 Aug
dust213–90.0919%15 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0310%15 Aug
cache13–90.0515%15 Aug
nuke13–40.0420%15 Aug
cache9–130.0434%15 Aug
nuke13–30.0919%15 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0323%15 Aug
nuke13–30.1225%13 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0117%13 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0931%10 Aug
dust213–30.1219%10 Aug
cache13–60.0610%10 Aug
nuke13–160.0623%10 Aug
nuke13–100.0214%10 Aug
cache10–13-0.0518%7 Aug
cache13–90.0812%7 Aug
ancient13–110.0416%7 Aug
mirage13–80.1511%7 Aug
cache7–7-0.0317%7 Aug
ancient9–13-0.053%7 Aug
ancient13–40.0419%7 Aug
nuke3–130.0115%6 Aug
dust213–100.0112%5 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0311%5 Aug
anubis13–11-0.065%5 Aug
ancient13–10-0.029%5 Aug
dust213–100.099%5 Aug
anubis13–40.0519%5 Aug
mirage13–160.1311%4 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0524%4 Aug
dust211–13-0.0219%3 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0114%3 Aug
mirage13–20.086%2 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0613%2 Aug
dust211–130.0114%2 Aug
mirage7–13-0.006%2 Aug
dust213–40.0819%2 Aug
mirage9–130.0319%2 Aug
anubis5–13-0.049%1 Aug
nuke13–40.0224%31 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0823%31 Jul
anubis13–60.0516%31 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0145%31 Jul
cache8–13-0.0633%31 Jul
nuke13–50.0018%31 Jul
cache3–13-0.0614%30 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →