SkiZ — CS2 Stats
FR76561198452446136[U:1:492180408]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.
Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=36,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Pink band median | Red band median | vs Red band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 59.2% | 46.9% | 49.2% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 6.8% | 13.0% | 13.3% | 6.6% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.18 | 1.08 | 1.12 | above |
| Match win rate | 50.1% | 46.7% | 48.5% | above |
This profile matches the typical Red band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).
Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower positioning profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.4° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dust2 | 74 | 57% | 1.14 | 16.9 |
| Inferno | 60 | 48% | 1.21 | 17.6 |
| Anubis | 58 | 60% | 1.25 | 17.6 |
| Mirage | 49 | 51% | 1.18 | 17.7 |
| Nuke | 24 | 71% | 1.03 | 15.9 |
| Ancient | 17 | 53% | 1.20 | 18.4 |
| Vertigo | 7 | 71% | 1.55 | 16.3 |
| Overpass | 5 | 40% | 1.31 | 15.6 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.