deskwarmer69 — CS2 Stats

76561198450938149[U:1:490672421]✓ No bans

700Tracked matches86%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,888Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1228 of 6935 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdeskwarmer69FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER24,888 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning47
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY76222Last 10076%Win rateLLWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression5.0
Utility4.9
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch0.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.7
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time509ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 526ms → last ⅓ avg 509ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%−6.2%
first ⅓ avg 27.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 11–13
130Biggest win — mirage
16Longest win streak
L2Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 82% over 11anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2722581%0.01
dust2S2619773%-0.01
ancientS2015575%-0.01
infernoS119282%0.01
anubisD62433%-0.03
nukeS54180%-0.01
cache330100%0.02
vertigo220100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches
55%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
69.3ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

23%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1155%0.9113.6
Ancient367%0.8718.7
Dust2367%1.1112.3
Inferno250%0.8624.0
Nuke10%0.6911.0
Anubis1100%0.4810.0
Vertigo10%0.509.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
506msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
49.6%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
12.17HE damage / grenade
5.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4629 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.8387% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.0120%27 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0417%26 Aug
mirage13–40.0217%26 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0033%26 Aug
mirage8–00.019%26 Aug
dust213–3-0.0224%26 Aug
dust213–50.0526%26 Aug
vertigo6–0-0.0114%26 Aug
dust213–40.0331%26 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0518%26 Aug
dust213–80.0129%26 Aug
inferno13–70.029%25 Aug
ancient13–60.0125%25 Aug
dust213–9-0.0518%25 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0014%25 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0220%25 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0115%25 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0025%25 Aug
ancient7–13-0.029%24 Aug
ancient13–40.0336%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0524%24 Aug
ancient13–10.0528%24 Aug
mirage13–100.0323%24 Aug
ancient13–100.0535%23 Aug
nuke13–110.0126%23 Aug
cache8–10.0020%23 Aug
mirage13–40.0416%23 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0613%22 Aug
ancient13–1-0.0022%22 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0323%22 Aug
ancient13–30.0224%22 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0527%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.089%21 Aug
ancient3–00.0767%21 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0536%21 Aug
inferno13–20.1041%21 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0218%21 Aug
dust29–13-0.0031%20 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0712%19 Aug
cache13–60.0213%19 Aug
dust213–2-0.0618%19 Aug
dust24–13-0.0628%19 Aug
dust213–5-0.0127%19 Aug
mirage5–1-0.0214%19 Aug
mirage9–130.0214%19 Aug
dust213–5-0.0036%19 Aug
mirage13–10.0732%19 Aug
inferno11–130.0211%19 Aug
ancient13–10.0141%19 Aug
mirage8–130.0314%19 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0519%19 Aug
anubis13–7-0.037%19 Aug
dust213–11-0.0115%18 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0326%18 Aug
mirage13–80.0615%18 Aug
anubis16–130.0113%18 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0326%18 Aug
nuke13–10.0124%18 Aug
dust213–10.0341%18 Aug
dust213–6-0.0416%18 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0123%18 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0718%18 Aug
dust213–7-0.0338%18 Aug
dust213–5-0.0423%18 Aug
mirage13–50.0126%18 Aug
dust28–13-0.0623%17 Aug
mirage13–10.0720%17 Aug
dust213–30.0218%17 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0244%17 Aug
mirage13–50.0748%17 Aug
dust213–10.1113%17 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0323%17 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0427%17 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0133%17 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0231%16 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0819%16 Aug
mirage13–60.0530%16 Aug
dust213–5-0.0540%16 Aug
anubis5–13-0.1035%16 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0125%16 Aug
mirage13–00.0536%16 Aug
dust213–10-0.0222%16 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0517%16 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0523%16 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0438%16 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0121%16 Aug
dust213–10-0.0815%15 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0228%15 Aug
cache13–10.0424%15 Aug
mirage13–20.0167%15 Aug
dust29–13-0.0320%15 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0617%15 Aug
mirage13–00.0128%15 Aug
mirage13–100.0120%15 Aug
inferno13–70.0224%15 Aug
dust213–50.0532%15 Aug
inferno11–130.1226%15 Aug
dust24–13-0.0411%15 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0023%14 Aug
dust27–130.0325%14 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches16-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →