󠁳⁧⁧-𝑽𝒆𝑳𝑳𝒂 — CS2 Stats

76561198447557570[U:1:487291842]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,545Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,304Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,445Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#14318 of 57997 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSilver II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

22,445Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 22,445
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,555 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,670), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	51.9%	46.0%	47.0%	above
Shot accuracy	15.8%	12.6%	12.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.90	1.06	1.07	0.17 short
Match win rate	37.1%	45.8%	46.4%	9.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning52

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–39–3Last 10058%Win rateLWLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5

Aggression8.0

Utility5.7

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.9

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.8° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning5.2

Utility5.7

Mechanics6.6

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time633ms+43ms

first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms

Headshot accuracy30.7%+4.4%

first ⅓ avg 26.3% → last ⅓ avg 30.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — ancient 13–5

13–1Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8dust2Weakest map · 41% over 22

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	24	13–11	54%	-0.02
dust2	C	22	9–13	41%	-0.01
ancient	A	20	12–8	60%	-0.01
mirage	S	17	12–5	71%	-0.01
anubis	S	8	6–2	75%	-0.01
nuke	S	6	4–2	67%	-0.02
cache	—	3	2–1	67%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

371,435Lifetime kills

0.90K/D

15,961Matches

37.1%Match win rate

51.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players

15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players

31,353MVPs

6,304Hours (in match)

7,537Bombs planted

1,618Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4793,558

AWP89,139

Desert Eagle48,374

M4A4 / M4A1-S38,600

P2000 / USP-S18,001

Glock-1811,718

SSG 089,017

MAC-107,701

MP96,243

Knife5,096

Lifetime map wins

34,836inferno

12,877dust2

5,232nuke

3,415vertigo

2,767train

154cbble

109office

100italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,079Matches

50%Win rate

1.02Avg K/D

82.8ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	98	50%	1.15	17.9
Dust2	77	49%	0.97	15.7
Ancient	64	44%	1.00	16.7
Inferno	48	38%	1.00	17.0
Anubis	43	44%	0.97	15.8
Nuke	16	38%	1.00	14.7
Cache	10	70%	1.10	17.3
Vertigo	8	38%	0.84	15.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.6%Headshot accuracy

37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.2%Spray accuracy

79.7%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

611msReaction time

40.9%T opening success

42.7%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

6.4%Flash assists

8.01HE damage / grenade

15.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4732 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	5–13	-0.12	15%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	21%	28 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	23%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	18%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.05	26%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	45%	28 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	24%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	16%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.08	40%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	38%	27 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.05	25%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.04	16%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.05	50%	27 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.07	0%	27 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.00	23%	27 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.13	100%	27 Aug →
mirage	10–1	-0.01	40%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	26%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	31%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.02	33%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	17%	22 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.03	25%	22 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.02	32%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.01	19%	22 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	18%	22 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.02	18%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	42%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.03	41%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.07	32%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.00	35%	21 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.02	60%	21 Aug →
ancient	1–9	-0.10	17%	21 Aug →
mirage	9–2	0.04	44%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	41%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.05	52%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.02	33%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.04	36%	21 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.11	50%	21 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.02	53%	21 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	30%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.07	31%	20 Aug →
dust2	0–3	-0.08	0%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.06	13%	20 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.09	38%	19 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.12	100%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	30%	19 Aug →
dust2	1–2	-0.13	0%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.12	22%	18 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	19%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	17%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.04	27%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.05	24%	18 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	42%	17 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	36%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.03	30%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.02	21%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.08	30%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	24%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.07	17%	17 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.03	67%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.07	53%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.07	36%	16 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	24%	16 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	17%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	21%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.08	30%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.02	30%	16 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.11	0%	16 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.12	25%	16 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	29%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.05	41%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	38%	15 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.03	31%	15 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	15%	15 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	18%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.08	36%	15 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	20%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	24%	15 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.05	22%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.02	27%	14 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.02	21%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.05	24%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.04	25%	14 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	29%	14 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.03	27%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.01	29%	13 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.03	33%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	26%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.02	24%	13 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.06	3%	13 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.01	26%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	23%	13 Aug →
inferno	16–13	-0.03	27%	13 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	19%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	28%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	41%	11 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.09	27%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.01	35%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.00	27%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.02	49%	11 Aug →