Coochiemaru

Coochiemaru — CS2 Stats

US76561198440800958[U:1:480535230]Steam profile ↗

2,133Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,977Purple band · top ~12.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6059 of 11872 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,795 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCoochiemaruFACEITLevel 7 · 1,795 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,977 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning49
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51427Last 10051%Win rateLWWTTLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression6.1
Utility6.3
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.9
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time636ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 9–4
131Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB39192049%0.01
ancientB179853%-0.02
cacheA117464%-0.02
infernoB115645%-0.01
nukeA95456%-0.01
anubisC83538%-0.02
dust232167%-0.04
overpass21150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

913Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
82.1ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7756%1.0814.9
Anubis3653%1.1716.1
Ancient3145%1.0014.6
Inferno2669%1.2917.5
Dust21937%0.9413.8
Nuke1662%1.2317.8
Vertigo1155%1.3916.6
Cache40%0.7212.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
630msReaction time
28.5%T opening success
47.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
9.34HE damage / grenade
13.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.4904% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–130.0221%27 Aug
cache13–11-0.0110%27 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0415%25 Aug
mirage12–120.0515%25 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0724%25 Aug
mirage8–13-0.019%24 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0210%23 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0324%22 Aug
mirage13–70.0129%22 Aug
mirage13–40.0316%22 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0515%22 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0420%20 Aug
mirage13–30.0414%18 Aug
mirage13–80.0617%17 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0021%17 Aug
inferno9–40.2123%16 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0110%6 Aug
inferno9–30.1025%5 Aug
cache2–1-0.03100%5 Aug
mirage13–6-0.039%5 Aug
anubis7–130.0135%4 Aug
cache8–13-0.049%30 Jul
cache11–13-0.0410%30 Jul
cache13–10.0015%29 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0437%28 Jul
mirage10–130.0319%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0024%22 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0115%22 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0620%21 Jul
mirage4–130.0016%20 Jul
ancient13–90.0310%20 Jul
mirage13–10-0.017%17 Jul
ancient13–60.0013%16 Jul
mirage13–10.1214%14 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0316%14 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0414%12 Jul
mirage13–90.0315%12 Jul
cache13–90.0417%12 Jul
mirage13–80.0816%12 Jul
cache13–11-0.0513%8 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0311%8 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0423%24 Jun
nuke13–70.0218%23 Jun
mirage15–15-0.069%23 Jun
ancient11–130.0212%23 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0413%20 Jun
ancient13–100.0025%20 Jun
mirage7–130.0216%20 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0312%20 Jun
inferno13–80.0728%20 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0011%19 Jun
ancient13–20.0121%19 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0323%2 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0521%2 Jun
cache8–13-0.0415%30 May
mirage13–4-0.0210%29 May
ancient7–13-0.0611%29 May
mirage13–80.0219%28 May
dust213–6-0.054%28 May
nuke11–130.0314%27 May
dust213–11-0.0324%27 May
ancient13–11-0.068%27 May
mirage9–130.0314%26 May
ancient2–13-0.0723%23 May
dust27–13-0.0315%23 May
mirage13–100.0832%23 May
mirage13–100.0018%23 May
mirage7–130.0741%23 May
ancient13–10-0.0118%22 May
inferno4–13-0.0818%22 May
ancient13–9-0.0422%21 May
nuke10–13-0.0433%20 May
mirage13–10-0.0617%20 May
cache7–13-0.0330%18 May
inferno9–13-0.0216%18 May
nuke13–10-0.0221%14 May
mirage9–13-0.0815%13 May
mirage12–12-0.0118%13 May
overpass9–130.0122%12 May
inferno8–80.0214%11 May
nuke11–13-0.0222%11 May
mirage10–130.0213%11 May
inferno10–13-0.1018%10 May
anubis6–13-0.069%10 May
ancient13–10.0818%10 May
mirage13–30.1119%10 May
mirage11–13-0.0418%7 May
mirage10–00.1614%6 May
ancient13–100.0417%6 May
nuke16–120.0222%6 May
inferno3–9-0.1737%6 May
mirage13–80.0018%5 May
mirage7–13-0.0317%3 May
anubis15–15-0.0410%3 May
nuke13–11-0.0114%3 May
overpass16–14-0.0320%2 May
ancient4–13-0.097%2 May
anubis6–130.018%1 May
cache13–60.0216%1 May
cache13–2-0.0417%1 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →